News Ticker

Plastic Words and Shadow Language: The Trickology of Tyranny

Plastic words and phrases are language which is used so commonly but loosely as to lose its meaning. It is used for stagecraft theatrical performance rather than to convey clear meaning. With minimal substantive meaning and clear definition, they are useful as tools of Orwellian misdirection and lies. They are widely used as tools of propaganda and are particularly insidious when passed into law.

In 1979, the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism (JCIT) marked the beginning of development of the “terrorism” meme.  With 700 mucky mucks attending, including top level deep state operatives, this appears to have been a seminal event in the global coordination of false flag “terrorism.” It was followed up 5 years later by the Washington Conference on International Terrorism which helped establish “terrorism” as a new focus of Israeli, U.S., and European foreign policy.

The timing of the “war on terror” – just as the cold war was winding down would suggest the involvement of the permanent war machine. Today so much resources have been spent on chasing boogeymen that war simulations now show a diminished US military losing a war with China, or China/Russia.

War Games Simulation Shows U.S. Forces “Crushed” By China .

All readers are encouraged to be cautious of narratives that feature “terrorism,” which is in itself a suspect term.

After 2001, language was developed to include “extremism” (both violent and non-violent). The concept of “radicalization” has been developed to facilitate internet censorship.

The German linguist Uwe Pörksen in his 1988 Plastikwörter: Die Sprache einer internationalen Diktatur (literal translation into English: Plastic words: The language of an international dictatorship)  describes the emergence and steady expansion during the latter half of the 20th century of selected words that are incredibly malleable yet empty when it comes to their actual meaning. Plastic words have surreptitiously seeped into our everyday language and dictate how we think.

Sometimes specific phrases are launched by a particular event. Most seem contrived and programmed. The latest is “anti-Asian hate”.

The plastic words scamsters define this in their own “research”: 68% of  anti-Asian “attacks” documented was verbal harassment, and 21% was shunning. The dictionary defines the word attack as “to engage in physical violence against something with the intent to cause physical harm, damage, or death.” Using attack to describe shunning (avoiding, distancing) and mean words is clearly a made up concocted plastic word. Using “harassment” is a plastic word as well. This is legally defined as: n. the act of systematic and/or continued unwanted and annoying actions of one party or a group, including threats and demands. Flipping someone off doesn’t fit.

Bureau of Justice Statistics – actual violent crimes

African-Americans -13% of US population – 27.5% of all violent crimes against Asians

Whites – 62% of US population – 24% of violent crimes against Asians

One plastic word, democracy, is a form of government involving events called “elections”, which claim to reflect the will of the citizens but are votes to choose the least worst between dark triads. In almost all western countries this democracy plastic term is in reality a kakistocracy or plutocracy.

For further reading:

“Combating disinformation” or ‘fact checking’ sounds impressive, but is fundamentally just narrative pushing. The term is typically combined with another sketchy term “panel of experts”.

Together with “extremism” “radicalization” is one of many which New Underworld Order brainwashers are seeking to use to demonize dissent by equating truth telling and earnest inquiry with violence, as a tool to facilitate internet censorship.

The word “radicalization” was little searched upon until 2014. Global interest in the term increase by a factor of approximately 10 over the 4 years up to October 2017. We hold that astro-turfing (both human and non-human) on social media kick-starts these propagandistic terms.

Google search trends for the word ‘radicalization’

This insinuation with direct linking of violence is typical, allowing emotional support from a gullible populace so that star chamber laws can be written to include non-violent behavior, such as speaking, reading, viewing, writing – and even trash talking and shunning.


Read: More than Merely Dubious: How I Was Permanently Banned at Reddit


The phrase is used, for example, as an explanation of the behavior of “lone nuts” (often false flags or staged deceptions) and when framing internet censorship laws.

The latest is a ludicrous story of a lone crazy white man shooting up a  massage parlor because he “was addicted to happy endings.”


Read “Why Staged-Deception Events Are Used More Often Than Pure False-Flags Operations”

The phrase polarizes the world into “us” (the normal) and “them” (the “radicalized”). The evidence that such a process exists is uncertain at best.

Typically you see the benign-sounding plastic phrases “improve solutions” and “targeted actions” used when referring to the identification and removal of yet another eye-of-the-beholder plastic phrase: “dangerous extremist content.”

“Hate crime” is one of a set of plastic phrases used to try to facilitate the introduction of laws that stifle free speech and end anonymity on the internet.

A “fake hate crime” is a false flag hate crime and may make up a large proportion of alleged hate crimes. They often include alleged incidents of racism such as name calling or graffiti, although the faking of violence is not uncommon. A website, http://fakehatecrimes.org attempts to keep track of fake hate crimes in the USA.

A “hate group” is a group which promotes a “hateful” ideology such as racism or sexism. These groups are a special focus of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which staff members alleged in March 2019 suffered from a “systemic culture of racism and sexism within its own workplace.”


Read “The ADL Tags Benign Things as White Supremacist to Manufacture Boogeymen, Remain Relevant”

The idea of “hate crime” and “hate speech” goes back to the 1960s. A “hate crime”, according to Wikipedia as of April 2019 is “(also known as a bias-motivated crime or bias crime) is a prejudice-motivated crime which occurs when a perpetrator targets a victim because of his or her membership (or perceived membership) in a certain social group or race.”

“Counter-terrorism” is the modern element of justifying the military-industrial-surveillance terrorism-congressional (MISCC) complex. After September 11, 2001 governments and commercially-controlled media promoted the concept of the “war on terror”, causing a boom for the MISCC in general, in particular for manufacturers of weapons and mass surveillance equipment.

Anti-semitism, like its close relative “Holocaust Denier”, is another etymological misnomer with no clear meaning. In the current widespread and weaponized form it is used to demonize people deemed to be threatening to Judaic narratives and to close down rational debate. A more accurate description of those it is applied to would be “people who organized Jews don’t like.”

It is our sense in following the severely over-used employment of this and similar terms, that a forbidden fruit Streisand curiosity effect has set in, particularly with younger people. This works as free advertising and exposure for the targets of this slur. I often quip that I invite the New York Slimes or their ilk to use one of their plastic word slurs on Winter Watch.


Tim Kelly, Russ Winter on the Methods the Crime Syndicate Uses to Instill Mass Delusion

The Latest Clown World BS from the New York Slimes is the Op-ed ‘Don’t Go Down the Rabbit Hole’


Accordingly the slur’s purveyors have had to up the ante and resort to shut er down censorship and attacks on the 1st Amendment. This is turn is facilitating burgeoning demand toward work around counter-platforms.

Roger Waters was quoted in 2016 as stating about the music industry that “My industry has been particularly recalcitrant in even raising a voice [against Israel]. There’s me and Elvis Costello, Brian Eno, Manic Street Preachers, one or two others, but there’s nobody in the United States where I live. I’ve talked to a lot of them, and they are scared s***less. If they say something in public they will no longer have a career. They will be destroyed.”

In this video from a Democracy Now interview a former Israeli minister explains how anti-semitic charges are weaponized.

Other plastic words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly:
class, totalitarianscienceprogressivereactionarybourgeoisequality, freedom, Nazi, fascist.

Most of the new plastic words and phrases are not time-tested terms but rather an invention. Older readers, I’m sure you will agree and the charts confirm that these terms we almost unheard of prior to 9/11 or even the second Obama term. It also demonstrates how rapidly Orwellian brainwashing emerged non-organically and “out of the blue.”

One set of terms were “diversity” and “inclusion,” which is postmodernism for “shallow diversity and inclusion.”

And where did the term “whiteness” come from, and from what sources? Umh, the NY Slimes again. Whodathunk.

And the term “white supremacy” went parabolic starting almost to the day Trump announced his run for president. Did someone have a scripted game plan?

Same is true of the plastic term “systemic racism” – once again the script writers created and utilized this vague term and launched it into orbit.


Read “Out of the Blue: Insertion of Social Engineering Terms into Kakistocratic News Publications”

10 Comments on Plastic Words and Shadow Language: The Trickology of Tyranny

  1. RW : The latest is a ludicrous story of a lone crazy white man shooting up a massage parlor because he “was addicted to happy endings.”

    *

    The reported “Robert Aaron Long massage parlor shootings targeting Asian women” on March 16, 2021 :

    = the 53 rd anniversary of the Mỹ Lai massacre on March 16, 1968 …

    and :

    = 777 days

    after the embarrassing, fake Jussie Smollett “MAGA / racist / homo attack” lies, alleged on January 29, 2019

    MG

  2. I was wondering when “anti-Asian hate crimes” (by “white supremacists” of course) would show up in the news (I almost never listen to radio since the only radio station out here that can be heard without static is that God-awful NPR!) since I hardly ever visit MSM sites…then sure enough heading out of area last week good ol’ NPR brought up on “All Things (anti-white and anti-libertarian) Considered” that spa shooting of (only) Asian women (to hell with the fact that whites were also murdered) by of course a “white supremacist” and as soon as the point of killings was made I told hubby that they’d blame a “white supremacist” for it (as I had not heard about it prior to NPR’s broadcast). And now, of course, Commie Kammy is “Asian”!

    Next up will either be a “white supremacist” shooting up a Synagogue or shooting some Native American at some reservation casino or something (remembering back to the Kosher market shooting by Black Hebrew Israelites, which lasted maybe two days in the news….if “white supremacists” had done it they’d still be talking about it!

    And if this happened to white? Not a word…..

  3. “War Games Simulation Shows U.S. Forces “Crushed” By China”

    I wouldnt take this article seriously at all, it reads like a sales pitch for the military industrial complex. “Buy more F-35s because… ya know China and Russia and stuff…

  4. One of the main reasons that Heidegger must be confronted is his understanding about how language is related to the ‘essence of Being!’ He called it the ‘House of Being!’ For Heidegger, it was language that created man, not man who created language. Everything from the way our tongue tenuously tickles our teeth through time to formation of the words with sound, tone, and meaning…It is language that separates man!

    “We often refuse to accept an idea merely because the tone of voice in which it has been expressed is unsympathetic to us” – Nietzsche

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/203310.Poetry_Language_Thought

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/437563.On_the_Way_to_Language

  5. It’s not illegal to talk derogatory about a Race verbally or in the media as long as rights are not being violated?

    • >talk derogatory

      It depends on the country/law — in general, nearly every European country, certainly the major ones (the UK, Germany, France), have laws against ‘incitement’ — often the phrase ‘inciting racial hatred’ is used (Volksverhetzung in German); or posing a ‘threat to public order’: Jared Taylor of AmRen was banned from Europe because he was deemed to pose a ‘threat to public order’ — in addition, §130 of the German legal code where Volksverhetzung is defined also contains language designed to allow prosecution of ‘Holocaust denial’: “(3) Mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu fünf Jahren oder mit Geldstrafe wird bestraft, wer eine unter der Herrschaft des Nationalsozialismus begangene Handlung der in § 6 Abs. 1 des Völkerstrafgesetzbuches bezeichneten Art in einer Weise, die geeignet ist, den öffentlichen Frieden zu stören, öffentlich oder in einer Versammlung billigt, leugnet oder verharmlost.” — anyone who praises the Nazi regime, or minimizes the officially recognized crimes of the Nazis (including the alleged extermination of the Jews), can be punished with 5 years in jail — Holocaustleugnung is one of the two crimes in Germany that will always land you in jail — the other is not paying tax — I have seen defendants given probation for homicide/taking a life — if you don’t believe me, search for Marcus Hempel and translate the text of any article you find about him: during a minor verbal altercation, he was punched in the face by a Syrian ‘refugee’, then fell backward and hit his head; he later died — the guy who punched him was given probation (Bewährung) — on top of that, after protesting this decision, including by appearing/speaking at rallies, Hempel’s father was visited by authorities and threatened with jail.

      • >if you don’t believe me

        Ulm: Milde Strafen für „Flüchtlinge“ nach Gruppenvergewaltigung

        Im Fall der Gruppenvergewaltigung eines 14 Jahre alten Mädchens hat das Landgericht Ulm am Montag vier Asylbewerber verurteilt. … Zwei der Angeklagten müssen nun für zwei Jahre und drei Monate in Haft. … Die beiden anderen müssen wegen Vergewaltigung, Beihilfe zur Vergewaltigung und Körperverletzung für je zwei Jahre und zwei Monate ins Gefängnis.

        4 ‘refugees’ were sentenced for the gang rape of a 14 y/o girl: 2 to 27 months, 2 to 26 months — barely 2 years — migrants and ‘refugees’ seem to generally get mild sentences even for serious crimes.

        Contrast that to Germar Rudolf, who spent in total > 4 yrs of his life in jail for ‘denying the Holocaust’ (link) — Ernst Zündel was jailed for 5 yrs (link).

  6. Wow! That Shulamit Aloni video is up there with the Chuck Schumer “Guardian of Israel” AIPAC video.

    https://youtu.be/Qh8rpFTVBuM

    Even with these frank admissions people refuse to extrapolate any further than – “yeah, so what, Jews have strong racial solidarity.”

    Yes, they sure do, it’s at the expense of yours.

  7. Kakistocracies [kakitrotskycies also accurate] such as the Soviet Union, China and now the USA can not exist without complete censorship, and aggressive thought police prosecution and sentencing of any wayfaring travelers.. Welcome to the world of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and the gulags.

  8. Great stuff, Russ. One chart is worth a thousand words.

    USrael is much more powerful than China and/or Russia. The legacy US military is intended for domestic use, as it’s no longer needed for international control.

Post a Comment

%d bloggers like this: