Portrait of Evil: Karl Marx, a Disciple of Hell on Earth

Karl Marx Monument in Chemnitz, in eastern Germany. PHOTO: The Conversation/AP/Jens Meyer

Just like Jeremy Bentham, who we discussed previously, Karl Marx (1818 -1883) was yet another promoted, made man and lifetime actor. Like Bentham, there is no other way to analyze him other than personality, actions and personal life history, which appears Sabbatean and/or Luciferian.

The Marx persona was convoluted, twisted and chameleon-like, as if someone wrote a script and tried to bury any aspects that didn’t fit the contrived narrative. Incredibly, Marx is held in relatively high esteem around the world. Why?

In May 2018, the German postal service released a postage stamp to commemorate the 200th birthday of Karl Marx. PHOTO: Dezeen.com

His ideological socialist rival, Mikhail Bakunin, got the big picture about Marx in spades. Once again, we see the familiar pattern of an elite group putting forth pseudo-philosophies designed to enslave the general population so that they can be lorded over and looted by what some call “oligarchs.” We call them “kleptocrats” or the Crime Syndicate.

‘This world is now, at least for the most part, at the disposal of Marx on the one hand, and of Rothschild on the other. This may seem strange. What can there be in common between socialism and a leading bank? The point is that authoritarian socialism, Marxist communism, demands a strong centralization of the state. And where there is centralization of the state, there must necessarily be a central bank; and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, speculating with the Labour of the people, will be found.’ Profession of faith of a Russian socialist democrat preceded by a study on German Jews (Letter to Le Réveil, Paris, 1869 )

Before his death in 1876,  Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin sounded the alarm far and wide about a plutocratic bankster capture of the revolutionary movement.

The 1872 Hague Congress was dominated by a struggle between Marx and his followers, who argued for the use of the state to bring about socialism; and the Bakunin faction, which argued instead for the replacement of the state by federations of self-governing workplaces and communes. Bakunin was expelled and smeared as an “anarchist” to this day. In stark contrast to Marx, those who met and knew Bakunin separate from the political realm had the nicest things to say about him.

So Marx’s role was to use workers as “useful idiots” and blind tools, which they hoped to be able to manipulate. To carry on with their conspiracy in the name of the working class, they had to cultivate and shape all sorts of communist and socialist utopias. Marx hoped to exploit the jealousy of the stupid proletariat to enforce a hell on earth in which fear, suffering, terror and treason ruled supreme.

From the beginning, the Marx myth was steeped in obfuscation. His father, Hirschel ha-Levi Marx — a justice on the Supreme Court with links to the Rothschilds — had opportunistically converted to Christianity in 1816. What a coinkydink given that Hirschel’s father was a famous chief rabbi in Cologne. His father-in-law was also a rabbi.

On May 5, 1818, in the German town of Trier, Marx was born. Despite being an alleged Christian, he was given the Mosaic name Moses Mordecai Levi Marx. “Karl” was used as a cover name for his Christian persona. He was not baptized until age 6. Feel free to debunk it, but there is a claim that he was London-based Lionel Nathan Rothschild’s third cousin.

Then, by sheer coinkydink, young Marx went to a Jesuit school at the same time he went to a Talmudic school, where he learned that Jews must rule the world. Bernard Lazar [Lazana] (1865-1903), a well-known functionary and publicist within Judaism, confirmed that Marx had been affected by Talmudism.

Little is known of Marx’s childhood but, in college, his sullen sociopathic-side came through. The death of his father in May 1838 may have affected him and made him bitter, as his income from the family evaporated.

Marx became an atheist and took to poetry that expressed apocalyptic hate for humanity. Forty poems and the verse-drama “Oulanem” written by Marx have been found to date. In his little ditty, “Der Spiel-mann” (“The Fiddler”), he admitted:

That art God neither wants nor wists,
It leaps to the brain from Hell’s black mists.
Till heart’s bewitched,
till senses reel:
With Satan I have struck my deal.

In another poem, Marx promised to lure mankind with him into hell in the company of Satan. 

In “Human Pride” [published in “World Revolution” by Nesta Webster, p. 167], Marx told us what he really thought and reveals himself a true psycho. Like Bentham and ilk, nobody seemed to give a hoot about the core of these monsters.

With disdain I will throw my gauntlet
Full in the face of the world,
And see the collapse of this pygmy giant
Whose fall will not stifle my ardor.
Then I will be able to walk triumphantly
Like a god, through the ruins of their kingdom.
Every word of mine is fire and action.
My breast is equal to that of the Creator.

Marx made this typical bombastic statement on April 14, 1856: “History is the judge, the proletariat its executioner.”

He found great pleasure in talking about terror and about houses marked with red crosses, which indicated the inhabitants were to be killed.

These words are reminiscent of Sabbeaten Jakob Frank’s expressions. It shows that Marx was likely affected by Frankism. Marx’s father had come into contact with Frankism and had also instructed his children in this ideology. Trier is a short distance from the Frankist center near Frankfurt.

At age 24, Marx the “Christian” worked for and became influenced by Rabbi Moses Hess, a rancorous firebrand. Hess introduced Marx to half-Jew Frederick Engels. Hess stressed the need to agitate the social classes against each other and, in this way, hinder their co-operation. He wanted to bring about a socialist revolution with the help of Judaism, racism and the class struggle. He stressed that socialism was inseparably bound to internationalism, as the socialists have no fatherland. The true socialist cannot have anything to do with his nationality.

He also declared: “This does not apply to Jews!”

Internationalism served the interests of Judaism. He stressed that the Jews had been given the role of changing mankind into a savage animal, as described in his article “About the Monetary System” [“Rheinische Jahrbucher” Vol. 1, 1845].

Marx himself just blandly (always typical of his tone) and openly admitted to the scheme: “Behind every tyrant there is always a Jew.”

In November 1847, he reorganized a band of revolutionaries, called The League of Just Men, into the Communist Party. Together with Engels, Marx reorganized (Soviet term) the league before the end of the year. Hess, Marx, Engels, Wilhelm Weitling, Hermann Kriege, Joseph Weydemeyer, and Ernst and Ferdinand Wolf played important roles. This occurred just ahead of the 1848 revolutions throughout Europe.

Then, Marx and Engels were alleged to have made some contrived split with Hess; but later, Marx and Engels stated quite openly that many of Hess’ ideas deserved wide recognition.

“The Communist Manifesto” published in London was probably largely ghost-written. It was a hodgepodge of previous thinking. Marx only further developed the ideas of Illuminist leaders Adam Weishaupt and Clinton Roosevelt. He cut and pasted the words of Utopian communist and Illuminati Francois Noel Babeuf (1760-1797) to show the way to the socialist (Illuminist) revolution.

For the record, I now believe the Illuminists were defacto Sabbeatean Frankists. Although the term “Illuminati” is useful, it’s a bit of a deflection.

In the manifesto, Marx drew from his anti-social college fantasies:

“The ruling classes shall tremble before the coming Communist Revolution!”

“We can only reach our goals by violently overthrowing the entire established order.”

“We are merciless and do not demand any clemency. When it is our turn, we will not hide our terrorism.”

[“Karl Marx: Eine Psycho-graphie” by Arnold Kunzli, Vienna, 1966]

In “Das Kapital” (1867), Marx argued it’s absolutely necessary to stress the need of violence in socialist actions.

He wrote: “Violence is the midwife who helps a new society struggle out from the womb of the old.”

What the spirit of Marx really wanted was to treat their subjects with such violence that they eventually lost all feelings of mercy and humanity toward their fellows. The Marxists also took all the proceeds of workers’ produced, and paid them too little or nothing at all for their work. In this manner, the Marxists developed modern slavery, which is something Bentham could only fantasize about.

The extinction of all-profound cultural values and creations was front and center. Marx’s “doctrine” only concerned the way physical work creates value. In contrast, he did not acknowledge creative thought. It differed from Hegel, who had thought in idealist terms, putting ideas in the forefront; whereas Marx sought to rewrite dialectics in materialist terms, arguing for the primacy of matter over idea.

Certain judges of Marxism try to claim that those who can interpret the doctrine correctly have not yet reached power. How is it that only Marxists who interpreted the doctrine wrongly came into power? Sheer coinkydink? There was certainly no way Marx had actually intended his “teachings” to work.

His college poem fantasies had come to fruition: “Lure mankind with him into hell in the company of Satan.”

According to the most famous myth, Marx had no money and was economically dependent on his “friend” Engels. In reality, Nathan Rothschild financed him.

Bakunin, in his “Polemique contre les Juifs” (“Polemic Against the Jews”), again set the matter straight, stating that Marx and his crew “had one foot in the bank and the other foot in the socialist movement.”

Marx craved the finest foods and French wine, among other things, all of which were imported for his family meals. His family had a weakness for expensive habits.

Marx’s uncontrolled drinking and his wild and expensive orgies only increased his fury at his environment. All the meetings in Paris had to be held behind closed doors and windows, so that Marx’s roaring was not heard out in the street.

Then there’s Engels’ own comments on Marx:

“Who is chasing with wild endeavor? A black man from Trier, a remarkable monster. He does not walk or run, he jumps on his heels and rages full of anger …

“He was livid with hatred, as if 10,000 devils had caught him by the hair”.

A famous socialist, Freemason and comrade of Marx, Giuseppe Mazzini, who had known Marx well, wrote this about him: “His heart bursts rather with hatred than with love toward men,” and added Marx was “a destructive spirit.”

He had a habit of warning: “I will annihilate you!”

Fritz Joachim Raddatz in “Karl Marx: Eine Politische Biographie,” Hamburg, 1975

Marx was an unreliable egoist and a lying intriguer who only wished to exploit others, according to his assistant, Karl Heinzen [Karl Heinzen, “Erlebtes,” Boston, 1864]. Heinzen also thought that Marx had small, nasty eyes “which spat flames of evil fire”.

Marx was not interested in democracy. The editorial staff of Neue Rheinische Zeitung was, according to Engels, organized so that Marx became its dictator.

He could not take criticism. He always became infuriated if anyone tried to criticise him. In 1874, when Dr. Ludwig Kugelmann merely hinted that if Marx would organize his life a little better he might finish “Das Kapital”, Marx would have nothing more to do with Kugelmann and slandered him ruthlessly.

Marx collected information about his political rivals and opponents. He delivered the notes he made to the police, believing it to be of advantage to him.

Karl Marx condemned exploitation of people. He himself exploited everyone near him. He fought all those he could not subdue. Even as a child, he had been a real tyrant. To work was what Marx wanted least of all. He speculated heavily on the stock market, however, constantly losing huge amounts of money. Neither did he show any consideration for the work of others. Many craftsmen he hired had to wait a long time for their pay. His housekeeper, Helen Demuth, worked like a slave in his household for 40 years without any cash pay whatsoever.

In further reference to Marx’s housekeeper Helen Demuth, it can be said that on June 23, 1851, she gave birth to a baby boy whose father’s name was Karl Marx. The father wanted to know nothing about Henry Frederick Demuth, however, so the boy was given up to a foster home. The case of the disowned son later became an embarrassment for the Bolshevik leaders in Moscow, so Joseph Stalin classified as secret those letters between Marx and Engels, where this affair is too apparent. (Viikkolehti, 11th of January 1992.)

Marx supported slavery in the United States of America. Like his brother Sabattean Illuminati  Albert Pike, he vented his racist opinions against blacks. Racism and anti-semitic canards were used by Marx as a gimmick of control and intimidation.

Marx preached about a better society but did not care about any morals. Nor did he care about cleanliness. This had a bad effect on both his health and his contacts with other revolutionaries. He suffered from boils for 25 years.

In 1873 these boils caused him a nervous breakdown leading to tremors and violent fits of rage. He never ate fruit or vegetables. Protracted insomnia was a consequence, and Marx used narcotics and became addicted. He liked wine and liqueurs and smoked an enormous amount of cigars.

Related posts from Winter Watch’s archive:

33 Comments on Portrait of Evil: Karl Marx, a Disciple of Hell on Earth

  1. Great piece. Add to this the history of the last 140 years of the wealthy contributions to marxist efforts. Rothschild funding the Paris Commune, Armand Hammer funding communists, Wall Street and the Bolsheviks. etc etc etc

  2. If anyone’s interested in reading the Epoch Times’ new book “How the Specter of Communism is Ruling Our World” by the same folks behind the Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party, then here’s the link: https://www.theepochtimes.com/how-the-specter-of-communism-is-ruling-our-world-list-of-chapters_2658181.html

    Even though Chapters Three and Eleven have blackwashes of National Socialist Germany, and Chapter Fifteen seems to be pro-Israel, the book exposes Communist aims and means nonetheless, so people can identify them and thus distance themselves from them.

    • Keep in mind that geneologies of usual suspects are constantly scrubbed and details omitted. We also have the common crypto strategy during this era. Miles Mathis on this referring to Engels:

      They do however scrub his genealogy, perhaps even better than Marx. His parents are not listed in his common biography. They claim he was Protestant, of course, but with some digging, I discovered his maternal great-grandmother was an Altmann, which may be Jewish. His other great-grandmother on that side was named Scholten, which is also probably Jewish. See Rudolf Scholten, who is currently on the Board of Kontrollbank, Austria, and the steering committee of Bilderberg (the steering committee also includes an Altman!).

      Engel’s maternal side is defnitely not German, being Dutch or Jewish from his mother back. On his father’s side we fnd a Steinbach as his great-grandmother, and a Hagbaum as his g-g-grandmother. The first may be Jewish, but the second is even more likely. Another g-g-grandmother was née Vogt, which also may be Jewish. Also an Erkenswick, which doesn’t sound Jewish but which brought up some links to current Jewish people on a websearch. The same can be said for the surname Roeland or Roland, which doesn’t sound Jewish (to me) but which brought up links to Jewish people on a websearch, including a rabbi.

      But honestly, the strongest evidence in my mind is his collaboration with Marx.Everyone else involved on the ground foor of this project was Jewish, so the probability is already very high Engels was, too. It was a Jewish project, so we would expect all major players to be Jewish. It is remotely possible Engels was involved because his family came from bankers and merchants, and not Jews. But since logic dictates that if you need to make an assumption, you assume the most likely thing, is that Engels was Jewish. Given what we have learned in previous research, that shouldn’t have to be proved, it should have to be disproved. His genealogy listed online is very far from disproving it.

  3. If Marx supported slavery as you say, he had a funny way of showing it. He corresponded with Abe Lincoln on several occasions, offering his support to crush those rebels and abolish states rights forever (which he correctly saw as an impediment to his worldly goals)!

    • It is not me claiming it. Engels put their apology for slavery thusly. Keep in mind there is also defacto slavery- which is more about controls than actual ownership. Slavery has a much broader meaning than just slaves in the Old South. There is no consensus on what a slave was or on how the institution of slavery should be defined. Marx was primarily interested in slaves as capital and who controlled them- which would be Marx and his ilk.

      That’s why the Benthams, Marxs and Huxleys are always going off about ant-hills, gulags, and Panopticons. Marx may not have openly supported it, but he enabled it and it was put into practice by the Bolsheviks.

      “Slavery had been invented. It soon became the dominant form of production among all peoples who were developing beyond the old community, but in the end was also one of the chief causes of their decay. It was slavery that first made possible the division of labour between agriculture and industry on a larger scale, and thereby also Hellenism, the flowering of the ancient world. Without slavery, no Greek state, no Greek art and science, without slavery, no Roman Empire. But without the basis laid by Hellenism and the Roman Empire, also no modern Europe. We should never forget that our whole economic, political and intellectual development presupposes a state of things in which slavery was as necessary as it was universally recognised. In this sense we are entitled to say: Without the slavery of antiquity no modern socialism.

      “It is very easy to inveigh against slavery and similar things in general terms, and to give vent to high moral indignation at such infamies. Unfortunately all that this conveys is only what everyone knows, namely, that these institutions of antiquity are no longer in accord with our present conditions and our sentiments, which these conditions determine.

      But it does not tell us one word as to how these institutions arose, why they existed, and what role they played in history. And when we examine these questions, we are compelled to say—however contradictory and heretical it may sound—that the introduction of slavery under the conditions prevailing at that time was a great step forward.

      For it is a fact that man sprang from the beasts, and had consequently to use barbaric and almost bestial means to extricate himself from barbarism. Where the ancient communities have continued to exist, they have for thousands of years formed the basis of the cruellest form of state, Oriental despotism, from India to Russia. It was only where these communities dissolved that the peoples made progress of themselves, and their next economic advance consisted in the increase and development of production by means of slave labour. It is clear that so long as human labour was still so little productive that it provided but a small surplus over and above the necessary means of subsistence, any increase of the productive forces, extension of trade, development of the state and of law, or foundation of art and science, was possible only by means of a greater division of labour. And the necessary basis for this was the great division of labour between the masses discharging simple manual labour and the few privileged persons directing labour, conducting trade and public affairs, and, at a later stage, occupying themselves with art and science.

      The simplest and most natural form of this division of labour was in fact slavery. In the historical conditions of the ancient world, and particularly of Greece, the advance to a society based on class antagonisms could be accomplished only in the form of slavery. This was an advance even for the slaves; the prisoners of war, from whom the mass of the slaves was recruited, now at least saved their lives, instead of being killed as they had been before, or even roasted, as at a still earlier period.”

      • “There is no consensus on what a slave was or on how the institution of slavery should be defined.”

        When Marxists (including Marx and Engels) wrote of slavery, feudalism, and capitalism, they had quite definite understandings of what was meant by those terms. Of course if you were to ask non-Marxists then those terms acquire all sorts of meanings (in fact, some bourgeois academics argue that the term “feudalism” should be retired or at least used with caution.)

        Engels’ quote is explicitly about slavery in antiquity. He even writes (in words you’re quoting) “that these institutions of antiquity are no longer in accord with our present conditions and our sentiments.”

        As you may know, for Marxists slavery, feudalism, and capitalism are all considered historically progressive in relation to what preceded them. Marx and Engels denounced chattel slavery in the United States, primarily because it was against the interests of both the ascendant industrial bourgeoisie and the working-class.

        So I don’t see how you can argue that Marx and Engels “supported” slavery, any more than they “supported” feudalism or “supported” capitalism in overcoming obsolete modes of production.

    • @ Pale Rider1861
      Marx, along with his BFF Abe Lincoln were cut from the same cloth. It was never about freeing the slaves with Lincoln, it was about establishing a strong central government in America which some day would model Marx’s socialist utopia. I know it’s a hard pill for Lincoln lovers to swallow, but Marx and Lincoln held many of the same views. Why do you think many of the communist who fought and lost the 1848 communist revolution in Europe ended up as general’s in Lincoln’s union army?

  4. When American economist Henry George wrote Progress and Poverty in 1879, which became the world best selling economics text, the western world had barely heard of Karl Marx. George following on from the analysis of classical economic demonstrated that based on the factors of land, labour and capital , the fairest tax was that on land. Marx emerged into the Neo Classical economic world that like his counterparts (monopoly) capitalists, conflated capital with land. A false dichotomy of labour v capital thus arose which willfully excluded Georgian economics, but set the scene for subsequent Punch and Judy shows including the contrived Cold War.

    • When American economist Henry George wrote Progress and Poverty in 1879 …

      His book was the first 19th century work on political economics I read; I still have the old 1920s edition I bought from a used book store back in the 1970s — while popular and popularly known in his lifetime, George is largely forgotten and unknown today.

  5. Karl Marx Monument in Chemnitz, in eastern Germany.

    Search “Hetzjagd Chemnitz”, a Tiefpunkt for the despicable Merkel regime, where she, effeminate male minions like Horst “Drehofer”, and the Lügenpresse piled on the lies about people in Chemnitz and their reaction to the killing of German Daniel H. by knife-wielding asylum seekers in 2018, eventually leading to the replacement of Hans Georg Maaßen as head of the Verfassungsschutz, a deep state organ ostensibly for protection of the German Constitution (Verfassung) — as usual, Wikipedia reports in regimetreu fashion, including article titles: Deutsch, English.

    Tax Freedom Day — the difference between then and now is that today everyone is a slave — of the state.

  6. A rarely discussed book which manifests just how repulsive of a man Marx was is Richard Wurmbrand’s ‘Marx and Satan.’ Contained in that book are some poems Marx wrote, to Satan mind you, when he was young which shows the inner workings of his tormented mind. Marx was also known to fear a bar of soap on a regular basis, so I’m sure there was some ‘social distancing’ going on in his household on a regular basis!

      Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempts he any man:
      But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away OF HIS OWN LUST, and ENTICED.
      Then when LUST HAS CONCEIVED it brings forth SIN: and SIN, when it is finished, brings forth DEATH. [James 1:13-15]
      Stop with the Flip Wilson theology: “The Devil made me do it”!
      YOU TUBE: Flip Wilson on The Ed Sullivan Show

      The Pilgrims Society: A Century of Rockefellers, Rothschilds …
      The Pilgrims Society: A study of the Anglo- American Establishment; Rockefeller, Mellon, Luce, Rothschild, Cecil, Windsor, the Federal Reserve, WWII, the CIA, and So Much More

      This was

  7. I am unable to find the referenced quote about Marx luring mankind with him into hell in the company of Satan. Can you provide a link or at least the name of the poem?

    “Anti-Communism is anti-Semitism.”
    ~ Jewish Voice, July ~ August 1941.


    This may seem strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the largest banks? Ho-ho! The Communism of Marx seeks an enormous centralization of the state, and where such exists, there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, which profiteers from the labour of others, will always find a way to prevail. In reality, for the proletariat, this would be a barrack regime, under which the working men and the working women, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work, and live at the beat of the drum.” ~ Bakunin (1814-1876)

    Marxism, to which all branches of Socialism necessarily adhere, was originated by Jew Karl Marx, himself of rabbinical descent and has been dominated by them from the beginning. Marx did not actually originate anything; he merely “streamlined” Talmudism for Gentile consumption.

    This list suggests there was nothing ‘Russian’ about the ‘Russian Revolution’, yet this fact is mostly obscured by contemporary historians.
    1. “Some call it Marxism, I call it Judaism.” – Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, in the American Bulletin of May 15, 1935.
    2. “The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution” – The Maccabean (New York), Nov. 1905, p, 250.
    3. “Jewry is the mother of Marxism.” – Le Droit de Vivre, May 12, 1936.“Judaism is Marxism, communism” – Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 64.
    4. “The communist soul is the soul of Judaism.” – Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 143.
    5. “We Jews cannot be called upon to denounce Communism.” -The American Hebrew (New York), February 3, 1939, p. 11“The picture which the Soviet Union presents today is one that should bring rejoicing to world Jewry.” – The Youngstown Jewish Times, Sept. 18, 1936, page 51.
    6. “It would be absurd to deny the intensity of the Jewish participation in the Russian revolutionary movement.” – Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York) July-September 1932, p. 106.
    7. “That achievement – the Russian-Jewish revolution – destined to figure in history as the overshadowing result of World War, was largely the outcome of Jewish thinking, of Jewish discontent, of Jewish effort to reconstruct.” – The American Hebrew, September 10, 1920.
    8. “The Bolshevik Government of Russia is the key-stone of the arch of the proof of the Jewish conspiracy for radicalism and world-domination.” – William Hard, The Great Jewish Conspiracy (New York: American Jewish Book Company, 1920), p. 31.
    9. “The Jewish elements provide the driving forces for communism” – Dr. Oscar Levy, in George Pitt-Rivers, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution (Oxford, 1920), p. ix.
    10. “The Jews have been furnishing for the Bolsheviks the majority of their leaders” – The Jewish World (London), April 16, 1919, p. 11.
    11. “Russian Jews have taken a prominent part in the Bolshevist movement” – The American Hebrew (New York), November 18, 1927, p. 20.
    12. “Jewry has come to wield a considerable power in the Communist Party.” – Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 37.
    13. “The East-Side Jew [Trotsky] that Conquered Europe” – The Liberator (New York), March 1920, pp. 26-27.
    14. “The real East Sider [New York Jew Trotsky] is at the head of things in Russia.” – M. L. Larkin, in The Public (New York), November 23, 1918, p. 1433.
    15. “It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism; all this is in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews.” – Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 148
    16. “Karl Marx, who came from an old family of rabbis and brilliant Talmudic scholars, was to point the path of victory for the proletariat.” – L. Rennap, Anti-Semitism and the Jewish Question (London, 1942), p. 31.
    17. “Among his [Karl Marx’s] ancestors were Rabbis and Talmudists, men of learning and keen intellect.” – Henry Wickham Steed, in The American Hebrew (New York), December 9, 1927, p. 206 “The peculiarly Jewish logic of his [Karl Marx’s] mind” – Henry Wickham Steed, in The American Hebrew (New York), December 9, 1927, p. 206.
    18. “Mr. Wickham Steed lays the rise of Bolshevism at the doors of Jewry.” – The Jewish Guardian (London), November 28, 1924, p. 4.“The Bolshevik Revolution has emancipated the Jews as individuals” – Dr. Avrahm Yarmolinsky, in The Menorah Journal (New York), July 1928, p. 33.
    19. “There are many Bolshevik leaders of Jewish extraction” – D. L. Sandelsan, in The Jewish Chronicle (London), February 20, 1920, p. 22.
    20. “There is no Jew who does not hope with all his heart that the Soviet Union will survive and be victorious” – Zionist Review (London: Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland), September 26, 1941, p. 7.
    21. “Communism and internationalism are in truth and in fact great virtues. Judaism may be justly proud of these virtues” – Harry Watan, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 80.
    22. “If the tide of history does not turn toward Communist internationalism … then the Jewish race is doomed.” – George Marlen, Stalin, Trotsky, or Lenin (New York, 1937), p. 414 “The [Jewish] Commissaries were formerly political exiles. They had been dreaming of revolution for years in their exile in Paris, in London, in New York, in Berlin, everywhere and anywhere. They saw in the Bolshevist Movement an opportunity of realizing the extreme ideas of Communism and internationalism to which their fate had compelled them.” – Dr. D. S. Pazmanik, in The Jewish Chronicle (London), September 5, 1919, p. 14.
    23. “The Jewish people will never forget that the Soviet Union was the first country – and as yet the only country in the world – in which anti-Semitism is a crime.” – Jewish Voice (New York: National Council of Jewish Communists), January 1942, p. 16.
    24. “Anti-Semitism was classed [by the Soviet Government] as counter-revolution and the severe punishments meted out for acts of anti-Semitism were the means by which the existing order protected its own safety” – The Congress Bulletin, (New York: American Jewish Congress), January 5, 1940, p. 2.
    25. “There is no official anti-Semitism in Russia; anti-Semitism in Russia is a crime against the State.” – Dr. Chalm Weizmann, The Jewish People and Palestine (London: Zionist Organization, 1939), p. 7.
    26. “Anti-Communism is anti-Semitism.” – Jewish Voice (New York: National Council of Jewish Communists), July-August 1941, p. 23.“The part which Jews play in the [Communist] Government of the country [Russia] does not appear to be declining” – Harry Sacher, in The Jewish Review (London), June-August 1932, p. 43.
    27. “The Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth. This is the historic destiny of the Jews” – Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), pp. 99-100.
    28. “We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do, will meet our needs and demands. We will destroy because we need a world of our own.” – Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles, page 155.
    29. “The Russian intelligentsia . . . saw in the philosophy of Judaism the germs of Bolshevism – the struggle of … Judaism versus Christianity.” – Leon Dennen, in The Menorah Journal (New York, July-September 1932, p. 105.
    30. “Soviet Russia has declared war on Christianity, and on those who profess this faith. In the Russian villages today Bolsheviks and Herbert H. Lehman . . . were called the ‘secret government of the United States’ and were linked with ‘world communism.’” – Dr. Louis Harap, in Jewish Life (New York), June 1951, p. 20.

    “Anti-Communism is anti-Semitism.”
    Jewish Voice (New York: National Council of Jewish Communists), July-August 1941, p. 23

  9. “How is it that only Marxists who interpreted the doctrine wrongly came into power?”

    What about China? They went from a broken, defeated nation to the preeminent economic power in the world using that very doctrine. They’ve been the engine of economic growth since 2008.

    They’re the main obstacle to the globalist degrowth agenda and the first country to successfully boot Soros out. It may be a hard pill to swallow but Red China is the only thing capable of stopping the WEF/globalists insane plans for world domination.

    • China wasn’t revived by Marxism. It was revived by massive foreign investment on behalf of the very elites behind the CFR, Bilderbergs, WEF etc. Initially conceived as a pivot for a lever to move a USSR that was an obstacle to a global government, the project took on a life of its own when the enormous profits rolled in for western elites. What the elites failed to consider was that racially homogeneous China was largely immune to globohomo nonsense. What the Chinese failed to consider was adopting tools of western financial capitalism leads to the same problems of boom/bust, corruption and malinvestment.

  10. Plz don’t consider this a dumb question/request: Would u explain a little bit by what u mean with this statement” For the record, I now believe the Illuminists were defacto Sabbeatean Frankists. Although the term “Illuminati” is useful, it’s a bit of a deflection.

  11. 1)Nice article but be careful: despite being freemason, Mazzini was not Jewish!

    2)Could you give me detailed reference where I can find Bakunin statement on Rothschild and Marx?

    3)A figure that deserve to be analysed is Israel Lazarevich Helphand, alias Parvus. I haven’t seen any article about him but he was the mentor of Trotsky (they wrote ‘The Permanent Revolution’) and later a financer linked to the Warburgs.
    His relationships with Young Turks are also very interesting: at a certain point he moved to Constantinople where for sure he met Emanuele Carraso, head of the Salonicco Lodge (where the coup d’etat was conceived).
    Interesting fact: Carraso and Giuseppe Volpi, later minister of Finance under Mussolini that negotiated Morgan’s loan to Italy in 1926, knew each other!

    4) Have you ever written articles on the ascent of Mao in China? I couldn’t find in the website

  12. Six hundred thousand Sudeten Germans were killed during the massacres in the earthly hell of the death camps of Czechoslovakia. The Sudeten German White Paper records these horrors with full details on more than 1,000 pages, horrors for which there is no precedent in the history of mankind. Armed Czech women and Jewesses continued hitting the womb of expectant mothers with truncheons until a miscarriage followed, and in one single camp ten German women died daily in this way.

  13. I’d like to share something you may find interesting.
    I’m now aged 70 and remember seeing this news as a teenager.
    Sometime around 1968 to 1970ish, a mysterious ball of light hovered for three days and nights just above the grave of Karl Marx in London.
    The police stood guard, and even placed a blanket over the tombstone, to no effect. After three days it vanished of its own accord.
    This was reported in all the mainstream establishment press and mass media at the time, and was filmed on the BBC news.
    Trying to find this news item now, I found impossible! Perhaps someone could dig it up?

1 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Notre Dame fire: the alt-Right reaction and who the real enemy is – The Infohub

Post a Comment

Winter Watch

Discover more from Winter Watch

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading