News Ticker

Bringing Hegalian Dialetics Full Circle with the One-Party Venn Diagram

Our prior posts on Antony Sutton well illustrated the faux use of Hegelian Dialectic to drive the political discussion in a sistema where five corporations own the media. Unfortunately, we are heading into another “election season” during which we will be immersed with the dialectic. As a guide, the following Venn diagram lays out the issues in spades.

The aforementioned Antony Sutton articles:

This diagram should really be for 4 overlapping circles, with the additional two representing collectivists and globalists. We encourage readers to consider presenting this to learning-impaired friends and family members who wish to discuss partisan politics. The only thing missing from the list on commonalities is “looting at the public trough.” I would also add “cheerleading irresponsible central banking bailouts and easy money” to add clarity to doing Wall Street’s bidding.

Read: The Neoliberal Political Economy of the Organized Crime Syndicate

The Venn diagram clearly illustrates that pre-selected wedge issues are used to keep the two sides divided and conquered while the real kakistocratic criminality goes on unchecked and unchallenged. The Crime Syndicate spends a lot of time, energy and money on this dialectic indoctrination, propaganda and gas lighting.

Princeton University professor Martin Gilens and Northwestern University professor Benjamin I. Page looked at more than 20 years worth of data to answer this simple question: Does the government represent the people? [Gilens and Page, “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens,” Perspective on Politics, 2014]

Their study took data from nearly 2,000 public opinion surveys and compared it to the policies that ended up becoming law. In other words, they compared what the public wanted to what the government actually did. What they found was extremely unsettling. The opinions of 90 percent of Americans have essentially no impact at all.

The following video, “Corruption is Legal in America,” gives a quick rundown of their findings. It all boils down to one simple graph that illustrates the kleptocracy in which we live.

Congress has 11% approval, but 97% of the crooked politicians get re-elected. It’s a cleverly rigged democracy.

Auditors at matched up the federal checkbook with the congressional campaign donor database [source:]. They found powerful members of Congress soliciting campaign donations from federal contractors based in their districts.

They followed the money and found a culture of conflict of interest. The confluence of federal money, campaign cash, private employment, investments, prestigious committee appointments, political power, nepotism and other conflicts are a fact pattern.

Furthermore, members of Congress own investment stock in, are employed by and receive retirement pensions from federal contractors to whom they direct billions of taxpayer dollars.

The party system has no Constitutional basis and was specifically warned against by George Washington. They are privately owned and operated corporations, unaccountable to even their own members, as demonstrated by the DNC’s and the RNC’s conspiracy of sabotage against candidates that fall outside the One Party State overlap.

Whether you believe the ‘Protocols of Zion’ was real or constructed by the enemies of Zion, this passage was prophetic.

Henry Ford probably said it best: “The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on.”

Protocol No. XII

Literature and journalism are two of the most important educative forces, and therefore our government will become proprietor of the majority of the journals. This will neutralize the injurious influence of the privately-owned press and will put us in possession of the tremendous influence upon the public mind. … If we give permit for ten journals, we shall ourselves found thirty, and so on the same proportion. This, however, must in nowise be suspected by the public. For which reason all journals published by us will be of the most opposite, in appearance, tendencies and opinions, thereby creating confidence in us and bringing over to us our quite unsuspicious opponents, who will thus fall into our trap and be rendered harmless.

All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions — aristocratic, republican, revolutionary, even anarchical — for so long, of course, as the constitution exists. … Like the Indian idol Vishnu they will have a hundred hands, and every one of them will have a finger on any one of the public opinions as required. When a pulse quickens these hands will lead opinion in the direction of our aims, for an excited patient loses all power of judgment and easily yields to suggestion. Those fools who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will be repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for us. In the vain belief that they are following the organ of their party they will in fact follow the flag which we hang out for them.

4 Comments on Bringing Hegalian Dialetics Full Circle with the One-Party Venn Diagram

  1. This writing is a bit long, and I appreciate your patience.
    Compromise and accommodation are offspring of Hegelian Dialectics. They are the false impersonations of true compassion and the understanding of an issue. They are resorts for those who are afraid of themselves and afraid of The Truth about something.
    The Truth is One, but that is too simple for those fighting off an obsession about it. It seems that the world does not want The Truth. So flattery, accommodation, and compromise, which are all couched in dishonest “drama and sacrifice”, saying to “meet in the middle”, sending forth dramatic cries in claims of “heroic duty” and “stark requirements of self-deprivation”. Meanwhile, many participants, who are blinded by their worship of some iconic “leader”– switch off to sleep, amidst the threatening trauma created by the onslaught of media manipulation. These human beings are served up to who they approve of. They like the way he talks, or her smooth delivery, or the peeks of cleavage revealed by the news reader’s clothing. All these “selections” are packaged again, by Hegelian practices.

    Blurred lines take away the definitions needed to see clearly, so that one can have access to common sense, which is not stimulating, so it becomes boring. “So, I don’t want to think about it.”

    The “Blind Eye” rules on its false, manipulative throne, self-satisfied in a fake power of control in letting wrong-doing get away. “Sometimes you have to GIVE a little”, is heard from the lips of convenience and accommodating agreement. This idea has all but obliterated true loyalty. It seems there is really nothing original to offer. We just get the silent stares.

    The craving to be at the top of something is not a concept or idea; it is a symptom of insane neediness: the spiritual bereavement from starvation of The Truth. Inside craving’s capture, it is impossible to satiate; to find enough of anything.

    Bribery greases the wheels of these seemingly “friendly” alternatives. Hegelian “options” are devilish at their root, and unashamed to seek to worm their way into people by convincing them they have nothing to begin with, and that originality, and taking true responsibility for something is unsafe, foolish, unpopular and “old technology”; concluding that the individual is too extreme; too whole: obsolete.

    We lose if we don’t find the True God. The whole panoply of appurtenances displaying all the gods of the new age goes back as far as when mankind first partook in forbidden fruit. “Take your pick!”. Putting such a private, personal topic on display like this causes havoc in silent ways. This is another example of Hegelian antics.

    At first I prayed to the “God who is really there”. God is big enough to find me. He is not religion, and He does not play god. He needs permission, if you will, to make the approach. Satan is sharpening his saw and so many will go mad before they pass away. Human beings must have full Truth about all things available to them if they can continue to go on; so they can know the true from the false. But who does one trust? True Humility sheds light on and chases away the influence of the Hegelian patterns and seductions. But it is not always understood because it is outside of the mind. We, individually, have to make the decision to have The Truth that is really there. That’s just the way we are made.

Post a Comment

Winter Watch