News Ticker

Interviews with Crime Syndicate Operative Turned Whistle Blower Ronald Bernard Provides Road Map for Understanding Epstein Affair

There are a series of interviews DVM-TV conducted with a Dutch banker and Crime Syndicate operative, turned whistleblower Ronald Bernard that is a must-see. Drug trafficking, sex trafficking, weapons trafficking and illegal wars involve vast sums money, and the banking and finance sector is the dark horse behind the scenes, Bernard explains.

His interviews provide a deeper understanding the vast power and crime network of financier and child sex trafficker Jeffery Epstein, on whom Winter Watch published many posts.


Read “Is the Federal Epstein Trial a Brownstone Operation to Take Down or Pressure Trump?”

The full five-part Bernard video interview series is at end of this post, and a link is provided to a transcript.

Winter Watch suspects Bernard may be a psychopath, or possibly a proto-psychopath. A proto-psychopath is someone who goes along for the ride out of greed, or just very low ethics. They are often compromised as well. As you watch the video, you can see this man relishing his role as a criminal financial operative, primarily in money laundering and market manipulations.

However, at about minute 22:00 [see transcript excerpt below] this whistle blower reveals he hit the wall when dragged into child sacrifices. This was his wake-up call. Bombard, who does body language analyses, states that this man is truthful or, at minimum, believes what he is conveying. He did not and will not disclose names under a vow of omerta.

His statements are very much consistent with everything Winter Watch has covered. For those new to this, a good starting point is “Belgium’s Dutroux Pedophile, Child Rape Affair: A Road Map for Deep-State Criminality.” Thus, even if the man is mental, we are not inclined to dismiss what he has to say, not in the least. There is just too much now confirming what he reveals. The whistle blower stated he operated in a closed, invisible and small world of between 8,000 to 8,500 Crime Syndicate operators and kingpins.

He speaks of the secret services or intelligence as being knee deep in the criminality. A primary goal is “creating a lot of misery in the world” as a business, almost right out of the Clinton Foundation playbook as revealed by leaks. He described the Crime Syndicate’s attitude as arrogant and superior, people are viewed as animals or sheep to be corralled and exploited. He thinks many of these actors are Luciferian.

The following is from the transcript, minutes 22:04 to 26:56. The full text is here.

INTERVIEWER: Can you tell me the worst thing that has happened that caused the tipping point in your situation?

BERNARD: Well, that was the beginning of the end, you get so deep into these circles and you sign a lifetime contract, not with blood or anything, to never disclose names of companies, organizations or people, I think that is why I am still alive. You have to stick to it. If we are talking about the worst things that I have experienced, I just told you about the things that made the freezer glitch, my conscience started to show itself. Let’s put it this way, I was trained to become a psychopath and I failed. I did not complete the training and I didn’t become a psychopath. My conscience came back and the most difficult part for me was, because I had such a great status there; I was a success, I was trusted with the people playing at this level. To put it carefully, most of these people followed a not very mainstream religion. So you have Catholics, Protestants, all sort of religions. These people, most of them, were Luciferians. And then, you can say religion is a fairy tale, God doesn’t exist, none of that is real. Well, for these people, it is truth and reality and they served something immaterial, what they called Lucifer. And I also was in contact with those circles, only I laughed at it because to me, they were just clients. So I went to places called Churches of Satan.

INTERVIEWER: So now we are talking about Satanism?

BERNARD: Yes. So I visited these churches, just as a visitor, dropped by, and then they were doing their Holy Mass with naked women and liquor and stuff. And it just amused me. I didn’t believe any of this stuff and was far from convinced if any of this was real.

INTERVIEWER: It was just a spectacle to you…

BERNARD: Yes. In my opinion, the darkness and evil is within the people themselves. I didn’t make the connection, yet. So I was a guest in those circles and it amused me greatly to see those naked women and other things, it was the good life. But then at some point, I was invited, which is why I’m telling you all this, to participate in sacrifices… abroad. (witness chokes up, tears start to fill his eyes and his voice cracks) That was the breaking point. Children.

INTERVIEWER: Ok… You were asked to do that…?

BERNARD: (Still visibly shaken) Yes. And I couldn’t do that.

INTERVIEWER: Would you like to stop for a moment, by the way?

BERNARD: No.

INTERVIEWER: Okay.

BERNARD: And then I started to slowly break down. I lived through quite a lot as a child myself and this really touched me deeply. Everything changed. But this is the world I found myself in. And I started to refuse assignments within my job. (Tear rolling down his cheek) I could no longer do it. Which made me a threat.

INTERVIEWER: For them…of course.

BERNARD: I was no longer capable of functioning optimally, my performance started to shake and I had refused tasks, I had not participated… the purpose of the whole thing, eventually, in that world, is that they have everybody in their pocket. You need to be susceptible to blackmail. And blackmailing me looked to be very hard if I look back on it. They wanted to do that through those children and that broke me.

INTERVIEWER: Is that – you’re not telling me anything new- what they do in politics?

BERNARD: If you google this, you’ll find enough worldwide witness accounts to know this isn’t a Walt Disney fairy tale. Unfortunately, the truth is, that worldwide, they have been doing this for thousands of years.

“Ronald Bernard: Revelations by an Insider (Part 1)” (April 2017)

“Real Big Power: Revelations by Insider Ronald Bernard (Part 2) – Answering Many Questions” (June 2017)

“Ronald Bernard: Revelations by an Insider (Part 3) – Answering Many Questions” (August 2017)

“Ronald Bernard: Revelations by an Insider (Part 4) – Answering Many Questions” (November 2017)

“Ronald Bernard: Revelations by an Insider (Part 5) – Answering Many Questions” (April 2018)

23 Comments on Interviews with Crime Syndicate Operative Turned Whistle Blower Ronald Bernard Provides Road Map for Understanding Epstein Affair

  1. Please consider sharing my Nano Blenders Thesis with your colleagues.
    A version of which can be found at
    https://www.academia.edu/18180349/Nano-Blenders_Thesis_17th_November_2015
    Further a list of adverse health outcomes from Titanium Dioxide in Food and
    Drugs can be found here.
    https://rgd.mcw.edu/rgdweb/pathway/pathwayRecord.html?acc_id=PW:0001437
    There is a growing body of evidence that many diseases are simply various
    forms of toxicity induced by nano particles.
    Multiple species are affected by the interactions of nano-particles and
    electro-magnetic radiation.

    Why is Titanium Dioxide in our Food? – henrymakow.com
    How Do Nanoparticles Harm – The Nano Blenders Thesis
    Titanium dioxide nanoparticles exacerbate DSS-induced colitis: role of the NLRP3 inflammasome
    Oral, short-term exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles in Sprague-Dawley rat: focus on reproductive and endocrine systems and spleen. – PubMed – NCBI
    Gene Expression in Liver Injury Caused by Long-term Exposure to Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles in Mice
    TiO2–NM promote leakiness of subcutaneous blood vessel. : Titanium dioxide nanomaterials cause endothelial cell leakiness by disrupting the homophilic interaction of VE–cadherin : Nature Communications : Nature Publishing Group
    Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce DNA damage and genetic instability in vivo in mice
    Session: Nano Blenders Thesis Part 2 Robin D P Watson Nanoparticle Excoriation promotes Thrombogenesis – A Possible Pathophysiologic Mechanism – Academia.edu
    Food-grade TiO2 impairs intestinal and systemic immune homeostasis, initiates preneoplastic lesions and promotes aberrant crypt development in the rat colon | Scientific Reports
    Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce strong oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage in glial cells. – PubMed – NCBI
    The Link Between Obesity and Titanium Dioxide
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095528631630804X
    Food-grade TiO2 impairs intestinal and systemic immune homeostasis, initiates preneoplastic lesions and promotes aberrant crypt development in the rat colon | Scientific Reports
    TiO2 Nanoparticle-Induced Oxidation of the Plasma Membrane: Importance of the Protein Corona – The Journal of Physical Chemistry B (ACS Publications)
    (PDF) Brain Inflammation, Blood Brain Barrier dysfunction and Neuronal Synaptophysin Decrease after Inhalation Exposure to Titanium Dioxide Nano-aerosol in Aging Rats
    Association of Type 2 Diabetes with Submicron Titanium Dioxide Crystals in the Pancreas. – PubMed – NCBI
    Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Trigger Loss of Function and Perturbation of Mitochondrial Dynamics in Primary Hepatocytes
    Evaluation of the effects of TiO2 nanoparticles exposure on the adult and vulnerable brains
    Maternal exposure to nanoparticulate titanium dioxide during the prenatal period alters gene expression related to brain development in the mouse
    https://biocoreopen.org/ijnme/Titanium-Dioxide-Nanoparticles-Evoke-Proinflammatory-Response-during-Murine-Norovirus-Infection-Despite-Having-Minimal-Effects-on-Virus-Replication.pdf
    The Effect of Ambient Titanium Dioxide Microparticle Exposure to the Ocular Surface on the Expression of Inflammatory Cytokines in the Eye and Cervical Lymph Nodes | IOVS | ARVO Journals
    Unraveling the neurotoxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: focusing on molecular mechanisms

  2. I too listened to these interviews a few years back when they first circulated. Initially the revelations rang true despite the lack of info on Bernard himself. I didn’t do much research, however, because I couldn’t imagine he was using his real name in the first place and even if you could devine his real name, the internet was probably scrubbed. The true stories of the Luciferians are simply not available and why would anyone expect them to be.

    Epstein is a facilitator and blackmail agent whose history is just plausible enough if you don’t connect too many dots. People don’t ask enough questions and when you do, like me for example, everyone just says you’re a crazy conspiracy theorist and not everything has a hidden agenda.

    What I wondered was, why tell it? What did Bernard gain by his revelation? Holland is a pretty compromised country seeing as how the government or some agency, clearly with government permission, was buying up our worthless Treasury bonds a few years back. Why would a country on the US payroll permit such an interview? I’m not saying that what Bernard shares is a lie, it’s just really curious when bold material like that is allowed out at all, seeing as how the global media is controlled by the oligarchs of their respective countries, who are all in collusion in the global game of controlling the masses. Never forget the ruse of Snowden.

    Most of the time I figure the whistleblower is planting a seed that will undo some prominent player when that leverage is needed, as with Harvey Weinstein. There is an internecine war afoot, it’s just not easy to determine who is after who, and maybe it really is all about just keeping everyone in line- like the Mafia used to do and, apparently, still does under many other names.

  3. So this creepy little POS says he have names, dates and locations of VIP:s performing child sacrifices, but he refuses to speak up because… oh, wait, he actually never gave a valid reason did he? Presuming he told the truth he is actually an accomplice to these ongoing crimes just by remaining silent and covering for these bastards, and then the creep has the audacity to cry as if we should feel sorry for him. It’s unbelievable how anyone can actually take this obvious operative seriously. Tell me, how come Mr Bernard is still alive and kicking, not to mention being allowed to do a ‘tell all’ on a Dutch national TV show and have his videos spread all over the internet for years if he really poses a threat to the powers that be.

    Put up or shut up, Bernard!

    • Need to correct one of your assertions. These interviews were conducted in 2017-2018. Thus Bernard has not been alive and kicking “for years” afterwards. In fact he has disappeared from the scene – who knows his fate.

      • Alright, not so long ago then. I stand corrected. However, I find it inconceivable that anyone can appear on a mainstream media outlet like a Dutch national TV show and make any kind of revelation of a controversial nature that could actually threaten these power-players. The entire European media is a ZOG-swamp territory, and they practice censorship on a near totalitarian level. Again, there is no acceptable excuse for Bernard to protect child-rapists.

        • So in your life how many corrupt things have you exposed ?
          You could start now and go to Haiti and expose the Clinton’s
          foundation in child trafficking – nearly all the work has been done for
          you already – all you have to do is publicly protest and quickly meet with your fate as all others have . But I’m sure you’ll be so brave
          the deep state hit men will run from you.

          The guy could just have kept quiet but he bravely went public without reward and hardly anyone does this the world over including the authorities – with millions of kids involved why dont you become an investigator – what are you waiting for ? you could become an exciting target for deep state assassins .
          Bernard has at least made a start when are you going to say peep .

    • Sambo, I read your link to an anonymous Steemit post by “mayb” and came to a some conclusions that I’m going to share with you in case you find it credible and are sharing it all over the Web.

      First, if a person is an anonymous writer claiming to be a well-known journalist (in order to impart to us credibility), they sure as hell better write like one. This source does not.

      – Even cub reporters know the word “noone” doesn’t exist. It’s two words: no one. “Mayb” repeatedly misuses uses it. This type of repeated error is different from misspelling or accidentally leaving out words. We all do this. It’s unavoidable and the reason editors exist.

      – Reporters in professional writing are also weary of and steer away from using the following words: no one, never, always. They’re traps. Instead, they use phrases like “not apparent” or “not immediately available.” I do not see any professional catchphrases in this person’s writing.

      – This writer repeatedly writes incomplete and grammatically incorrect sentences.

      – This self-proclaimed journalist uses ellipses (…). News writers don’t do this when writing professionally.

      Second, the writer claims Bernard is a fake because she/he could not find anything about him online. I don’t buy that argument, especially when it comes to people of foreign extraction. It’s also possible that he has changed his name.

      Third, “mayb” doesn’t dispute the ritual abuse claim. The ritual abuse claim is the reason Winter Watch shared these interviews. We are not recommending financing or participating in Bernard’s project.

      Fourth, the writer appears to claim that because a member of the Knights of Malta is involved in Bernard’s banking project, Bernard isn’t credible. “Mayb” said he/she asked Bernard about the association, and his response, in summary, is that there can be white hats in otherwise-corrupt organizations. Perhaps. But again, we’re not recommending investing.

      Fifth, “mayb” appears to try to discredit another of Bernard’s project members because of evidence they are both pro-Zionist and antisemitic. “Mayb” apparently doesn’t understand that those things are not necessarily opposite views. Ever heard of Hitler?

      Sixth and finally, “mayb” discredits Bernard over “The Protocols of Zion.” Bernard recommends reading it to gain an understanding of the Crime Syndicate and systema. “Mayb” writes that the book has been proved a fake. Regardless of whether or not book is fake, it does provide a foundation of understanding of organized crime and corruption.

      Therefore, Sambo, you should watch out. My conclusion is that “mayb” is a fraud/fake.

      • I would add that just because Bernard doesn’t list some form of a Linkedin resume doesn’t mean he wasn’t involved in financial trading activities. In fact the amount of under the radar suspicious trading is off the charts and the norm. See Jeffrey Epstein.

      • “Bernard” almost certainly is a fake persona. There is nothing, anywhere, that suggests he is real. Your points are weak: the writer may not be a native speaker, and ‘noone’ is a common mistake (there are even grammar pages about no one vs. no-one vs. noone).

        The way this video was originally distributed is extremely suspicious. “DVM TV” itself seems very dubious, their channel mainly features “Bernard” and some other dubious stuff.

        I don’t know why they push such stuff. Either it’s pure click-baiting, or it is an attempt to discredit serious research by spreading fakes. In a similar vein, they try to discredit serious power-structure research by pushing lunatic conspiracy theories.

        So please, watch out guys, in Summer and in Winter! 🙂

        • Thus far, other than refuting Bernard’s identity, you’ve failed to identify the “stuff” (information he provided) with which you disagree. Instead, you vaguely insult the the writers of Winter Watch for promoting “lunatic conspiracy theories.” Just what are those theories with which you disagree? You’ve got 24 hours to make a credible argument or else you’ll be permanently banned from this site.

      • Trying to ban criticism, nice. I watched these videos about two years ago, but I remember quite clearly that there is lots of BS in there discrediting serious witnesses and research in actual child abuse networks.

        But my main point was simply this: there is nothing, anywhere, that indicates this person is real. If you got any evidence, please share it with me.

        So again, I don’t say there aren’t child abuse and even child sacrifice networks (there are), but this doesn’t mean any guy on youtube is credible.

        • Again the key to reasonable discussion here are specifics not vague innuendoes. Work on your use of fallacious arguments. That is pretty much what I am observing.Saying so and so is dubious is called genetic fallacy or fallacy of origins and has nothing to do with truth.

          • So still zero indication or evidence “Bernard” is real, exactly as I suspected. A classic example of confirmation bias and red herrings.

            Not good folks, this is damaging your otherwise imporant work.

            How can you simply believe “Bernard” if he presents *zero* evidence for what he says?

            • A true whistleblower might name names (as Kay Griggs did) , but only if he desired a quick death. Instead he outlines a sistema, and is hoping for the best. I am not 100 percent sold, but am far far from your dismissal approach. As always we ask, nothing to see here move along? You decide?

              A bias? We have learned to check incredulity at the door awhile back. That is the trait of pajama people.

            • Again, this is simply confirmation bias and false rationalization. In the Epstein case alone we already got dozens of victim-witnesses with detailed descriptions of locations, activities and people. We got several Belgian victim-witnesses with detailed descriptions of murder locations that were later verified.

              But “Bernard”? ZERO. He presents no evidence for his stories, but what is worse, no evidence about himself! But adds lots of obvious conspiracy stuff that makes it easy to discredit the whole topic.

              Look, there is a fine line between pajama people and conspiracy land. All I say is please avoid both of these. Let’s do serious research and analysis.

              Obviously, I only write this because I believe in your project.

      • Also please not my original link was to a three part series, make sure to read all three parts to understand just how shady the “Bernard” op really is.

  4. Name drop by saying, “Walt Disney fairy tale”?
    There is basically soft core porn on Freeform and ABC and Disney these days

Post a Comment

%d bloggers like this:
Secured By miniOrange