News Ticker

The Postmodernist Cargo Cult Creates Carte Blanche for the Kakistocracy

'Believe Anything' by Barbara Kruger at Hirshhorn, Washington, DC. PHOTO: The Conversation/Steve Rhodes

Postmodernism is a political ideology that developed in the late 20th century. It’s characterized by subjectivism and relativism and deconstructs Enlightenment concepts of reason, objectivity and merit. The root idea is that “everything is a social construct.” Thus, it asks, how can one identify and qualify merit. The other root idea is that no real effort, insight or knowledge is required to achieve and have value in society. The end goal is leveling and is little different than the Illuminist revolutions described by Nesta Webster.

For further reading on Illuminism, see:

Postmodernists don’t truly believe everything is subjective, or “not real” (aka Cartoon or Clown World). After “disproving” existing reality, they choose a very specific new reality. They use subjectivism as a strategy to destabilize established thinking and tear down the pillars of Western establishment so that they may recreate society with their own Illuminist vision.

That vision is a socially-engineered “utopia” of anti-meritocracy, tyranny of the minority, Orwellian double-think and control over speech and behavior.

Read “The Prescience of George Orwell — ‘1984’ is Here”

The very word “postmodernism” is Orwellian double-think gibberish. A better word is counter-Enlightenment.

This is the “everyone is a winner” cargo-cult philosophy. Cargo-cult thinking is the belief that if we simply emulate the visual evidence of achievement through materialism, then real achievement will follow automatically. If you build it, they will come.

postmodernist grievance land rush

Special status and rights are given based on victim status. Additional power is gained by these “identity groups” by claiming they are oppressed, “not equal yet,” and for perpetuity. But it’s much like a land rush given that 99.9% of the people on the planet can claim some sort of ancestral oppression. So the “winners” of the postmodernist land rush are those con-artists who whine, and manipulate the loudest about so-called “grievances.” In practice it is not diversity, but shallow land grab diversity.

Ultimately, the postmodernism cult is about raw power. Once infiltrated into various institutions, they can infest and advance fellow cultists and useful sycophants.

Read “Clown World: Destructive Cults in the Broader Culture”

The cult, once in ascendancy, can pursue the subjugation of the majority of the population (in this case, by targeting majority “identity groups”) on behalf of a numerically faux-oppressed elite (minority groups), who tell everyone else how they should think and what they can do and say. This is a bizarre “tyranny of the minority” or idiocracy/kakistocracy.

Since judging and criticism are considered “oppressive” under cargo-cult postmodernism, it can serve as cover and smoke and mirrors for the kakistocracy — or rule by the worst. Kakistocrats thrive in a relativist, subjectivist or “do as thy wilt” system. It’s an environment made to order.

One of the tricks of postmodernism is to define it as a solely leftist phenomenon. Although it’s most definitely based in discordian Illuminist Marxism, it can more accurately be thought of as a strategy for asserting political and economic power than a true belief system.

Read “Portrait of Evil: Karl Marx, a Disciple of Hell on Earth”

Thus, we arrive at the age of warring postmodernist cults. Here, the warring cults on the left and faux-right accuse each other of “post-truth” and “fake news.” They set up a fake Hegelian dialectic. At this point, postmodernism seems to be the establishment ideology across the West.

There was a huge bandwagon effect. But having altered the environment so that objectivity and facts no longer matter, the strategy was opened for use by anyone, not just the postmodernist left. Enter Donald Trump, who just borrowed it. If facts don’t matter, and it’s just about subjectivity, then my subjectivity is just as good as yours. And so the postmodernist-right was born. This is personified by the Ben Shapiro soft-toss types.

Indeed, the large corporations have undeniably seen value in postmodernism. We know this because they have used their corporate media arm (five Jewish owned and managed corporations, headquartered mostly in New York) to widely spread the ideology and have strictly enforced it thru their individual HR departments. It shows up in inexplicable loss-leader advertising, such as with Gillette. Or it’s pushed to the limits with pornographic incest promotion. The more perverted, the more it is celebrated.

For further reading on this subject, see:

As the plebs inevitably begin to struggle and revolt against corporatism due to the externalities of predatory profit maximization, the Owners can opportunistically use postmodernism as an efficient way to suppress them. Again, this is accomplished thru the suppression of majority groups, using the facade of “freeing minorities” from oppressive majority-group tyranny (an imaginary enemy fabricated using their media assets). Additionally, the plutocrats can posture as “good” as they “protect” their minority tyrants.

Read “Microsoft Word Rolls Out Orwellian Newspeak Editor”

They can even go so far as to develop snitch technology so that brainwashed divided and conquered plebs can police and report on each other, making it cost effective.


Winter Watch Takeaway

This coalition of ideological postmodernists, pragmatic manipulative kleptocrats and opportunistic psychopathic politicians have utilized the no-accountability counter-enlightenment postmodern movement to broadly seize and exercise power.

3 Comments on The Postmodernist Cargo Cult Creates Carte Blanche for the Kakistocracy

  1. No doubt postmodernism, relativism etc have been important for the cabal

    But a theme I’ve picked up from Unz especially via Anatoly Karlin there, is that the main thing that is really afoot is a form of ‘Leninism’ –

    The key insight of the successful Marxist revolutionaries being, that you get a group of people who are lower status in the existing order, to be the marching army for the oligarchy that is taking over or seeking to destroy the potential opposition of middle class, petit bourgeois etc … This is the core of ‘Leninism’. The people raised in status, will be fiercely loyal to the oligarchy, as otherwise they fall in power.

    Part of the reality now tho, is that the oligarch-tied forces, are not so much ‘oppressing the majority’, as harnessing a coalition which IS the majority, against the group they find the most dangerous – European-heritage males, who are *not* the majority against the massive group including feminist and single women … plus LGBTers, and migrant and minority populations.

    This is what is behind the current common opinion that, ‘We can’t vote our way out of this’ … Single women plus minorities plus LGBTers plus cucked males … will tend to dominate in Western ‘democracy’, it is simply the numbers when groomed by the usual suspects

    This is also behind the opinion that ‘women’s rights’ to get supported by the state or by ex-husbands etc, is what lights the match that burns down the house, as J D Unwin’s 1934 book ‘Sex and Culture’, argued would be unstoppable in the West. Unwin went back to ancient times citing historical examples showing that every ‘woman’s rights’ culture eventually collapsed.

    Whereas in 1917 Russia the ‘Leninism’ was a combination of class interests plus of course the heavily Jewish Marxist cadres, today the categories are essentially ‘biological’ (led once again by Jewish cadres) … A European blogger in Asia using the name Spandrell, writes about this as ‘Biological Leninism’:

    « In order to build a political movement, you must give people higher status than they presently have. The key innovation of industrial-era politics was Leninism, which built a movement with those who were socially deprived in traditional society due to their class; peasants, workers and foreigners, which were loyal to the Communist project in exchange for erasing the class and tribe distinctions of traditional society.

    « In the post-industrial world, the mainstream political force, Progressivism, has built an effectively one-party regime by recruiting those who were lower status in both traditional and industrial society, ie. pre-1960 society due to their biological characteristics: unmarried women, homosexuals, people of different races. »

    Another Spandrell theme is how pretending to believe lies and absurdities, is how one demonstrates loyalty to the new order … it is like a uniform, and with a uniform, you have an army.

    Spandrell also puts it bluntly, that the appeal of political Islam is secure patriarchy (actually instinctively appealing to women as well). Hence Islam will grow and the West will likely implode in a death spiral.

  2. The thought occurs to me that the postmodernist movement is just one more aspect of the overarching Satanic drive to turn God’s created order upside down through embracing a false reality, celebrating sin, and calling evil good and good evil.

  3. Postmodernist view: We both know that good and evil are socially determined and are relative.

    Simple truth: Incorrect, and it is this line of thinking that has created the bulk of the problems we face as a society today. Things are made to look endlessly complex more so than they are, actually. That is the great tragedy of the human condition. Actually morality is very simple. Don’t steal from anyone or harm another person (unless in obvious self defense). Period. The end. There really is nothing more to it and if humans would come into harmony with this natural law, we could create an incredible world that is a paradise. The bulk of what you learn in school and media are just obfuscations designed to distract you, divide you and make you feel like you are not smart enough to really understand the world, so that our manipulators can maintain control over us.

Post a Comment

%d bloggers like this:
Secured By miniOrange