News Ticker

Observations on the Nice Truck Attack: Little Adds Up

I have seen French ID and the person's photo is not grainy like this.

Editors Note: We are updating and revamping our 2016 posts on four staged deceptions events during that year. We started with the event in Orlando, followed by Paris, and tomorrow we will cover Berlin. These renewed posts are necessary primarily because thought police at YouTube have memory holed much of the visual evidence necessary to employ the Trivium method to an analysis. This, in turn, trashed the earlier posts. As a work around, we have been able to relocate the evidence on alternative sites so as to avoid YouTube censorship.


In the years since the alleged terror event involving a large crowd along a major thoroughfare and promenade in Nice, France, we should have seen dozens of clear cell-phone videos and clear footage from numerous CCTV cameras. Few ever emerged. Furthermore, French authorities confiscated all CCTV footage and have kept it away from public scrutiny.


Read  “Reminder:  French Authorities Ordered Destruction of CCTV Images of Nice Terror Attack” 

Of course the question begs how does one manipulate and control a large crowd. The customary Bastille Day fireworks display took place between 22:00 and 22:20. The official narrative states that the truck turned eastward onto Promenade des Anglais at 22:30 a full ten minutes AFTER the crowd started filing out. At 22:35:47 – The truck came to a halt next to the Palais de la Méditerranée hotel and moments later the driver was shot and killed.

Peekay Truth makes key observations in the following video. There is useful footage of the crowd leaving. Initially it shows the crowd at the far end of the promenade some distance from where the truck stopped. On the TV banner you will see 10:36 PM. This crowd would have been stampeded well before the appearance of the truck and would have never seen a truck. This herded crowd has little idea what’s happening. They are used and filmed for advantage.

Several aspects point to 22:30-22:35 as the time the truck plowed through as violating the law of non-contradiction. In the clip staring at 18:30 with the TV banner marked 22:40 and 22:42, and oddly you can hear the band playing on in the background. By 22:55 the crowd is largely gone.

Then at 20:30 in the Peekay clip we hear a “witness” say that it all went down at “just after 11:00 PM.” Then at 21:40 we hear Johnny-on-Spot Richard Gutjahr, who filmed the truck, stating it “was a little after 11:00 when the truck approached”. These accounts violate the law of non-contradiction given that the official narrative said it started at 10:30 PM. At 11:00 PM (23:00) the crowd was gone. The stagecrafters would have ensured that nobody but actors were around when the truck came to a halt at 23:05.

The truck is visible before it slips behind trees. What goes on then is anybody’s guess. Only the very top of the container can be seen, and it does not appear to be moving that fast. The accounts say the truck moved at 40 to 50 kilometers per hour. After rampaging down the promenade for over a mile, 84 were alleged to have been mowed down and killed, and around 100 more were wounded.

A second video clip shows what looks like dummies out of Beatlejuice CGI central casting. These bodies are among the strangest I’ve seen in evaluating such events. They have no faces and no navels. Some look like animal carcasses. This violates the law of non-contradiction. The video quality is poor, and I submit that no one owns such a camera anymore, if they ever did. The viewer is given a very brief glimpse and only enough to get an impression. The video is slowed down to give a better look.

For video quality comparison, the next video is a night test of a non-cartoon world camera, the Samsung Galaxy S4, made in 2013. This would have been a 3-year-old camera at the time of the Nice “video.”

The question also begs as to how a truck can mow down people across multiple lanes. A delivery truck going 30 mph is not going to toss people this distance. The casualties were strewn out over a considerable distance (over a mile) and the width of the promenade of perhaps 30 meters. Furthermore, after an initial hit that would surprise the first group of people at the beginning of this rampage, there should have been ample warning and opportunity to get out of way. With bystanders milling around, we see the casualties already in body bags — but where are the aid personnel?

Now for a straightforward visual assessment using photos provided by the mainstream media.

Photo 1 shows the aftermath scene taken in the lattice area (which you can see on upper right) facing toward the truck at its final stop. It shows a swath of covered forms stretching down the promenade.

Capture

Photo 2 is at the end of the rampage and was taken much closer to the truck. The forms are scattered immediately behind the truck and extend back perhaps 50 meters. When Photos 1 and 2 are combined, the covered forms go back well over a hundred meters. For reference, the lattice shown in the featured photo is 55 meters long.

You can see the width of the truck. Compare this against the wide swath of once again covered bodies. You would think the truck was going 100 mph, not 30 mph. You would think those people had no warning and no clue about the danger. You would think the truck was 40 meters wide. This too violated the law of non-contradiction.

French-Truck-Terror-Attack

Next photo was alleged to have been taken by Sasha Goldsmith from a hotel balcony shortly after the truck stopped. This photo reveals NO BODIES behind the truck (Photo 2) or near the lattice area (Photo 1). In a newspaper interview Goldsmith claimed to have been an eye witness of the event (from this balcony) and said he saw people “being mowed down like ants.”

Presumably many, many other photos and video clips would have been taken and by now emerged from the “hundreds of hotel occupants” in the area, but none were ever forthcoming — other than Johnny-on-the-Spot Richard Gutjahr who spent much of his time afterward explaining why he didn’t take revealing photos.

Capture

The photos establish what is alleged to have happened and where it happened, but of course we need to know when the photos were taken. For Photo 3 to reveal no bodies would mean that a major evacuation and removal operation had already occurred since the time that Photo 1 and 2 were taken. That is not consistent with other images released.

Sunrise the morning after in Nice was at 6:05 a.m. Seven hours later – bodies just left out?

364CBF4900000578-3691019-image-a-76_1468568756739

images

However, there is no footage or photos showing a large-scale evacuation in the “kill zone” between the lattice area and the stopped truck. So to determine more details about these photos, we turn to a photo analyzer that reveals metadata. Please correct me if I am wrong, but my understanding is that metadata would have to be removed from photographs. Besides the time, the EXIF metadata would give the artist or photographer. It would also give the camera model used, which would be useful in examining the grainy, poor quality of so many of the images seen in these events.

And when I checked the Goldsmith photo- the analyzer says, “Does NOT contain EXIF metadata.” But when I first ran it, I screen-captured it, and it showed Goldsmith as the photographer and the date as 1:47 p.m. the next day, July 15. Goldsmith is from Melbourne. So, if we assume Goldsmith’s camera was set to that time, this would have been 4:47 a.m. Nice time. This is what we are offered? Really? Where are all the images for 11 p.m., or even midnight?

Photos 1 and 2 do not contain EXIF metadata either. Indeed, enter a Google search for images using the key phrase “Nice France truck attack,” use the original media url, and you will see that with few exceptions most of the media nighttime aftermath photos that were used offer no metadata. Of course, CCTV footage could also be scrutinized, but French authorities have elected to destroy that.

Capture

Source of all the following photos is the Daily Mail. Casualties are again far apart. This was a 19 tonne truck alleged to be going at 30 mph -not a Sharknado – violates the law of non-contradiction.

364AD85C00000578-3691019-image-a-39_1468565821092

Here we have a scene at another location. The bodies are strewn across the entire width of the promenade. And the person at the left couldn’t get out of the way? There is more covering of corpses, and again spectators are milling around. If a massive triage unit went through, did any of the bystanders take photos or footage of that operation? Haven’t seen it.

364A85BB00000578-3691019-image-a-118_1468550457839

This next photo looks like standard mocking from the Crime Syndicate. We are shown “a body” laying covered on the road. The form has lost it’s quite large left shoe, which happens to be black. The non-matching right shoe is definitely not black and is another type all together. To me, the small left foot looks like wax-museum quality. Somehow the form’s sock has come off.


Read Shoes in Staged Deceptions and False Flags as Both Calling Cards and Black Magik

3649E6CA00000578-3691019-image-m-67_1468567142016

The next photo shows what appears to be a woman laid out and covered. The chairs are untouched and there is no damage to the railing, quite the driving feat.

Capture

Capture
Source: Daily Mail

The second photo below shows the truck stopped after a 1.1 mile rampage. In a shocking display of no reaction, we see about 15 or more bodies laid out. Apparently these people had their backs turned and were not able to get out of the way? The Crime Syndicate media’s narrative shown on the left alleges people were trapped by the railings, but an examination of photos Winter Watch provides shows it would take little effort to step over and, in much of the area, there was no big drop-off to the sand.

Super truck is unfazed by a hit on a solid metal light-pole.

ss-160715-nice-terror-cr_02_c6210ee6d870138739adf8d4019c50c4.nbcnews-ux-1024-900

The finale shoot out. Truck is pristine, and no bullet holes visible in the truck cab or windows in the last few frames.

End of the line. This time in yet another contradiction lots of damage – but no visible blood on truck.

france-l-reuters

The U.K.s Daily Mail (aka Daily Fail) version of the Nice attack is pure, unadulterated nonsense and violates the law of non-contradiction. This was later changed to the entire attack taking place in six minutes over a distance of 1.7 kilometres (1.1 mi), between numbers 11 and 147 of the Promenade des Anglais. That would be about 10 mph- for the umpteenth time violating the law of non-contradiction.

rampage

21 Comments on Observations on the Nice Truck Attack: Little Adds Up

  1. The first time I heard of the website, Winter Watch, was on The Realist Report. Out of curiosity I added it to the bottom of my news aggregator in the off chance a headline piqued my interest. Over time I felt compelled to move Winter Watch somewhat higher in the queue. Now it is on the top row, and one of the first things I read every day.

    Just sayin’.

    • Glad to hear we are making some progress out there. Our reach has been restricted, we are shadow banned. Some sites that should be friendly don’t let us post our articles. Support from what’s left of the truther movement is spotty.

  2. Some observations-

    Notice the pattern of the ‘bullet holes’ in the windshield- everywhere but where the driver was- this gave a plausible excuse for the drivers escape.

    Those ‘bullet holes’ in the windshield are actually plastic stickers. A windshield that has been struck by bullets shatters. I know this because machine guns and explosives were a hobby of mine in my younger days. We would frequently buy an old junker and blast it – so I have shot up many windshields. They all shattered.

    I figured out how they got all the dummies on the ground so quickly- the bottom of the truck’s trailer was a see-saw- they lifted up one end and all the dummies slid out on the ground.

    If that truck had actually struck anyone, it would be covered with blood- the human head being filled with blood, and the front of the truck vertical. Strike dozens of people with that truck- bloodbath, literally. It would be dripping off the truck.

    • Shortly after this hoax, Aangirfan posted a photo of the Israeli joker who ran this op. Long curly hair, goofing around with a fish. A really diligent researcher (not me) could likely pull this picture up. Or, you could just contact Aang.

      Also, Aang’s site was attacked a few months ago, it’s largely restored, but if it happens again the site is backed up at Thrag.net.

  3. What exactly happened there then? How much was a stage setting with hired actors and props? How much independent computer or camera fake? What about the hospitalized casualties, their narratives and numbers? More is needed to establish this conclusively as a psy-op.

  4. So we are to believe that 49 people were there without wallets and purses, or no ID? absurd.

    AP:

    The Paris prosecutor’s office said only 35 bodies have been definitively identified so far, carried out by specialists with a judicial official present. That left 49 bodies still without identification. Touraine also said one of the hospitalized wounded still has not been identified.

  5. Yes what about the photo of the body wrapped in gold material (used for the moonlanding “spaceships”) with a clear baby doll lying next to it? When was the body so quickly wrapped? Why was the “baby” not taken care of?

  6. Sums it up for me. More efforts to scare everyone away from Europe. Is this in retaliation for the death throes of NATO? So sad to see France cooperating with this garbage. Still surprised at how many here in US believe this nonsense. Video quality alone should negate the whole event.

    • Since late 2014 ALL terrorists are required to keep their manifestos in their back pocket or wallet at all times. Unless a fax machine or solid Facebook connection is available during the commission of the “act”.

  7. Ugh….OMG…where to start!

    [1] Truck was remote controlled…there was no driver, hence the slow crawl down la Boulevard. Did the CIA hit the gas when it got down the road? Who the f**k knows…no video as of yet showing anything resembling a speeding truck.

    [2] The shootout….are you kidding me? All we see is a few cops shooting at, not shooting out with anyone. For all we know, Ali Baba Something-or-other was loaded into the remote controlled truck in advance — with a few bullet holes already in him (See: San Bernadino).

    [3] The bodies….puh-leeze. I always like how the clothes get blown off the vics in the bomb blasts, who knew getting hit by a truck could also blow of your shirt or pants. Also, all the bodies seem to have “stuck the landing” …none were caught underneath and dragged horrifically by the truck? Nor were any catapulted into the air and then tumbled down la Boulevard leaving a snail trail of blood and guts. Curious to say the least.

    [4] Black guy gets popped by Po-Po and we have livestreaming footage that is then replayed 100 million times in 24 hours. 200 people get hit by a truck and we have yet to have a single frame of evidence showing just one person getting clipped.
    __________
    I could go on….and probably will later…

    …and remember, without racism, the Democratic Party would be toast…they need racism so they can come to the rescue.

Post a Comment

%d bloggers like this:
Secured By miniOrange