Jewish Georgetown Professor Tweets ‘Entitled White Men … Deserve Miserable Deaths’ — and University, Twitter Are Okay With That

IMAGE: Fox News

Georgetown University Associate Professor Carol Christine Fair went on a Twitter tirade Tuesday in which she called U.S. Supreme Court nominee Judge Michael Kavanaugh a “serial rapist” and proclaimed that all “entitled white men” who defend him “deserve miserable deaths” and to have their corpses fed to swine.

Image result for "Carol Christine Fair"

It should be noted that Fair self-identified as Jewish by putting the triple brackets around her name; however, in some social media forums, there are claims that she’s “formerly Catholic” and a Jewish poser.

Twitter suspended her account following this tweet, which was probably the result of an automated ban by a bot. But then Twitter’s Jewish-led (((hate police))) quickly decided to restore her account once they identified her as a fellow Jew and realized her hate-filled tirade was toward “white men.”

In response to reporters’ requests for a comment, Fair’s employer issued this meek statement: “While Georgetown is committed to free speech and expression, we do not approve or endorse every statement made by our faculty members.”

Georgetown University Professor Carol Christine Fair. PHOTO:

Why the kit gloves? Why the special treatment? Who is this woman?

At Georgetown, Fair teaches peace and security studies, and “her work is primarily focused on counter-terrorism and South Asian topics,” according to Wikipedia. She’s a Chicago University grad who’s worked for the RAND Corporation and has published numerous books and articles that defend drone strikes in Pakistan and criticize Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and other humanitarian organizations.

Journalist Glenn Greenwald has called her writings “rank propaganda.” Other have called her work “simply false” and she has been accused of having a conflict of interest due to her past work with U.S. government think tanks, as well as the CIA.

And speaking of entitled attitudes, in January of this year, according to Wiki, Fair created a scene at Frankfurt Airport in Germany when her “bag was flagged for possibly containing explosives.” When German Federal Police searched her bag, she was told she would have to transfer her liquid deodorant to her checked bag or dispose of it. “Police stated that Fair was uncooperative, as she accused them of sexism and of being Nazis and thugs, and directed expletives at them. Fair was charged with slander under Germany’s defamation law,” Wikipedia states.

But this neoliberal professor isn’t the only ridiculous faculty member at Georgetown University.

Georgetown University Prof. Michael Eric Dyson delivers keynote address for the American Libraries Association (ALA). PHOTO: ALA/Cognotes

Professor Michael Eric Dyson in his 2017 book “Tears We Cannot Stop: A Sermon to White America” proposed the idea that white people should have an “Individual Reparations Account” to make donations to black institutions and individuals because of slavery. No, it doesn’t matter whether you’re a descendant of slave traders or owners, nor does it matter if your ancestors were slaves. If you’re white, you’re guilty and must pay. If you’re black, you’re a victim and entitled.

As if this wasn’t outrageous enough, a student group at Georgetown University — which is a private Jesuit-Catholic college — may lose its funding for promoting Catholic beliefs.

The group, called Love Saxa, “promotes marriage as a ‘monogamous and permanent union between a man and a woman’ and opposes hookup culture and pornography,” according to the group’s constitution, campus newspaper The Hoya reports. It also encourages “sexual integrity,” which means remaining abstinent before marriage.

President of so-called ‘hate group’ Love Saxa at Georgetown University, Amelia Irvine. PHOTO: RT/Love Saxa/Facebook

Of course, this ruffled the feathers of other campus flocks, namely LGBTQ groups, PRIDE and Queer People of Color and a pro-abortion student senator. They accuse Love Saxa of “fostering hatred.” Even the aforementioned student paper targeted Love Saxa in an editorial titled “Defund Intolerance.”

All this makes one wonder who’s running Georgetown University.

Jack ‘The Goy’ DeGioia PHOTO: The Hoya/Alexander Brown

Enter Georgetown U. President John “Jack” DeGioia. He serves as a member of the board of directors of the Carnegie Corporation of New York and is a member of the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on Values, according to Wikipedia.

Despite his undoubtedly hectic schedule scheming globalist agendas and preaching “values,” DeGioia still finds the time each fall to teach Georgetown’s freshman seminar in which he encourages students to pursue “unique courses of study” inspired by Jesuit educational themes.

For his works, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) honored DeGioia with its 2017 Achievement Award. The Georgetowner reports:

… [it’s] the highest award bestowed by Washington, D.C.’s ADL, which said, “DeGioia has an unyielding commitment to civil rights, religious tolerance, and creating a community where all faiths are welcome and respected.

At Georgetown, Dr. DeGioia has helped create the pioneering Center on Jewish Civilization and has partnered with ADL to help establish the Bearing Witness program.”

The award came during reported instances of swastika graffiti on the university’s main campus.

A Jewish center a Catholic university? Really? Do they have Satanist center, too? How about a hypocrite center?

Last but not least, let’s not forget Hawaii (D) Senator and Georgetown U. alumna Mazie Hirono, who last week — in response to a reporter’s soft-toss question about the Kananaugh accusations — stated, “I just want to say to the men in this country, just shut up and step up. Do the right thing for a change.”

These are just a few examples of how one unfortunately high-profile U.S. college is not only influencing the minds of tomorrow’s leaders of industry, institutions and government but shaping the very future of the country. Any questions, Judge Kavanaugh?

9 Comments on Jewish Georgetown Professor Tweets ‘Entitled White Men … Deserve Miserable Deaths’ — and University, Twitter Are Okay With That

  1. There is apparently much worse stuff about Brett Kavanaugh as a youthful Washington DC ‘operator’, his role in political murder to help Hillary & Bill Clinton … nothing to do with all these dodgy ‘student groping girl’ etc accusations

    This is from a notable source, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in the UK Telegraph, who in the 1990s was in the US investigating all the Clinton scandals, and now he writes of ‘My sinister battle with Brett Kavanaugh over the truth’

    Brett Kavanaugh, a young 30-ish aide to special prosecutor Ken Starr, is described as psychopathically intimidating and abusing key murder witness Patrick Knowlton, Kavanaugh assisting in FBI lying and suppression of evidence, helping Starr and the Clintons to mis-represent a murder as a suicide, in the violent death of Hillary Clinton law partner Vince Foster

    Makes out Kavanaugh as quite a scary figure, Deep State and corrupt

    • Star chamber errand boy operative- no wonder he is up for SCOTUS. The sex accusations from CIA psyops Christine Blasey Ford may be a “look over here” distraction.

      • Yes, that really makes sense, induced heated controversy about drunken school parties no one really remembers, fuel for fire on both sides, distracting from real crimes and lies that helped kill … More from Ambrose-Evans Pritchard’s article:

        Brett Kavanaugh … his duties in the mid-1990s as Assistant Independent Council for the Starr investigation, then probing Bill and Hillary Clinton

        Patrick Knowlton … a crime scene witness in the death of Vincent Foster, the White House aide and ex-law partner of Hillary Clinton … the Starr probe had never spoken to him, even though he had been the first person at the Fort Marcy death location and had highly-relevant information … the FBI had tried repeatedly to badger him into changing his story on key facts. Each time he refused.

        The Starr investigation issued a subpoena calling Mr Knowlton to the grand jury. He was to face questioning by Brett Kavanaugh. Before testifying, he suffered two days of what appeared to be systematic intimidation by a large surveillance team … the objective was to frighten him before his grand jury appearance.

        When Mr Knowlton appeared at the grand jury – thinking he was doing his civic duty – he says he was subjected to two and a half hours of character assassination by Mr Kavanaugh. There was little attempt to find out what he knew about the Foster death scene.

        Knowlton and his lawyer later filed a federal lawsuit against FBI agents he claimed were working for Brett Kavanaugh, alleging witness tampering and a conspiracy to violate his civil rights … Kavanaugh … failed to protect the rights of his own grand jury witness.

        The US federal prosecutor handling the death investigation at the outset, Miquel Rodriguez, resigned … His resignation letter said he was prevented from pursuing investigative leads, that FBI witness statements did not reflect what witnesses had said, that the ‘suicide’ verdict was premature, and that his grand jury probe was shut down just as he was beginning to uncover evidence … his work had been sabotaged by his own FBI agents. Rodriguez called for an open homicide investigation.

        Kavanaugh chose to go with the establishment rather than stick up for his colleague Kavanaugh went on to write the Starr Report on the Foster death [alleging suicide, hiding the evidence of murder]-

        The FBI had “concealed the true facts”, that there had been witness tampering, and that the report had wilfully ignored facts that refuted its own conclusions.

        Evidence of a wound in Foster’s neck, contradicted the official version that Foster shot himself in the mouth and had essentially been suppressed … key crime scene photos … showed a black stippled ring like a gunshot wound in the side of Foster’s neck … I [Ambrose Evans-Pritchard] interviewed the first rescue worker on the scene and when I asked him about the mouth wound, he grabbed me, and said with frightening intensity: “listen to me buddy, Foster was shot right here,” jabbing his finger into my neck. He said the FBI had pressured him too into changing his story and that official narrative was a pack of lies [Lies written up in final form by Brett Kavanaugh].

  2. This cult of psychopathic Jews need to die a miserable death. Jewish supremacy is the biggest threat to mankind in the history of mankind.
    People like Barbara Lerner Spectre, Noel Ignatiev, Eli Ben Dahan, New York Rabbi Yaacov Perrin and on and on and on…..
    The list of Jewish racists and supremacist would cover about 30,000 to 40,000 names just to scratch the surface.
    The vast majority of Jews are decent people just living their lives, mostly unaware of the sick and disgusting pseudo-religious death cult their brethren have cultivated over the last three centuries.

  3. What the hell is wrong with that bitch? And that white kid needs to get a set of balls and stand up for himself. Good God that was insane and criminal. He should have at least taken that article from her then charged her with assault rather than sitting there like a patsy.


    It must be seen and rejected as Jewish mind control at its most basic. It exists to confuse and disarm Gentiles and in its extreme forms to protect Jews. If it weren’t for Christianity and its passive, surrender-based nature, the Jews would not be around today to cause us so much trouble and expense and international bloodshed. The teachings of Jesus, whom the Jews pretend to hate, have kept the Jews alive and well.

    “And there arose not a prophet since in Israel like unto Moses”
    (Deuteronomy 34:10)
    Yahweh, a being of simple and bloody tastes

    “One night while Moses was in camp, Jehovah was about to kill him.
    But Zipporah [his wife] circumcised her son with a flint knife … So Yahweh did not harm Moses.
    Zipporah said, ‘You are a bridegroom of blood’.”
    – Exodus 4.24-26.

    NUMBERS 31:13-18:
    (13) Moses, Eleazar the priest, and all the leaders of the community went to meet them outside the camp.
    (14) But Moses was furious with all the generals and captains who had returned from the battle.
    (15) “Why have you let all the women live?” he demanded.
    (16) “These are the very ones who followed Balaam’s advice and caused the people of Israel to rebel against the Lord at Mount Peor. They are the ones who caused the plague to strike the Lord’s people.
    (17) So kill all the boys and all the women who have had intercourse with a man.
    ( 18 ) Only the young girls who are virgins may live; you may keep them for yourselves.

    “Do not think that I will accuse you before the Father. Your accuser is Moses, in whom you have put your hope. 46 If you had believed Moses, you would believe Me, because he wrote about Me. 47But since you do not believe what he wrote, how will you believe what I say?”…
    John 5:45 47

    For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
    Matthew 5:18


    Judaism is morally bankrupt; it has nothing to offer us but out-dated plagiarized myths, about some angry judgmental god that is remarkably exactly like the Jews themselves. The anthropocentric supremacist myths of the Jews should have little appeal to a person of high consciousness; such exclusionistic ideas are an anathema to any decent human being. The idea that you need salvation from a Jew should go against ever cell in your being, if not you need to examine what great fault lies within yourself.

    “Then some Pharisees and teachers of the law came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked,
    “Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They don’t wash their hands before they eat!”

    Jesus replied, “And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition?
    For God said, ‘Honor your father and mother’ [Exodus 20:12; Deuteronomy. 5:16] and ‘Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.’[Exodus 21:17; Leviticus. 20:9]

    But you say that if anyone declares that what might have been used to help their father or mother is ‘devoted to God,’ they are not to ‘honor their father or mother’ with it. Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition. You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you:

    “‘These people honor me with their lips,
    but their hearts are far from me.

    They worship me in vain;
    their teachings are merely human rules.’[ Isaiah 29:13]”
    Matthew 15:1-9.


    The Old Testament contains hundreds of prophecies about the Messiah; where He would be born, His lineage, what He would accomplish, how He would die. We also know that He would be a king like David (Jeremiah 23:5-6), a priest like Melchizedek (Ps 110:4) and a prophet like Moses (Deuteronomy 18: 15-19). This article is about what it means for Jesus as a‘Prophet like Moses’.

    What did Moses Say about Jesus?
    Moses is one of the most revered figures in Judaism as he is the one that God chose to give the Torah (Law) to at Mount Sinai. The “Torah” is the first five books in what Christians call the Old Testament – Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.

    “To believe Moses” means to believe what he wrote.

    Jesus said to the Jews that did not believe in Him that if they really believed Moses, they would believe Him;

    “For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me, because he wrote about Me. But if you don’t believe his writings, how will you believe My words?” (John 5:46).

    The Old Testament is so full of references to Jesus that He taught the disciples about Himself from the Law of Moses and from the Prophets on the road to Emmaus;

    “He said to them, “How unwise and slow you are to believe in your hearts all that the prophets have spoken! Didn’t the Messiah have to suffer these things and enter into His glory?” Then beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, He interpreted for them the things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures.” (Luke 24:25-27)

    Moses said that God would send a prophet like himself and that we must listen to him — in fact says that if we don’t listen, God will hold us accountable;

    “The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your own brothers. You must listen to him.

    This is what you requested from the Lord your God at Horeb on the day of the assembly when you said, ‘Let us not continue to hear the voice of the Lord our God or see this great fire any longer, so that we will not die!’ Then the Lord said to me, ‘They have spoken well.

    I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brothers. I will put My words in his mouth, and he will tell them everything I command him. I will hold accountable whoever does not listen to My words that he speaks in My name. (Deut 18: 15-19)

    Jesus was the Prophet like Moses that God raised up
    There were many parallels between Moses and Jesus; as infants both Moses and Jesus were almost killed by ruler’s edicts and both were protected from harm, both spent their early years in Egypt, both cured lepers (Numbers 12:10-15; Matt. 8:2-3) and both were initially doubted in their roles by their siblings. Moses lifted up the brazen serpent to deliver those that had faith and Jesus was lifted up on the cross to deliver all who would have faith. Moses appointed 70 elders to rule Israel (Num. 11:16-17); Jesus appointed 70 disciples to teach the nations (Luke 10:1, 17). But the most striking comparison between Jesus and Moses was that they were both prophets that taught the Law of God.

    Yes, Jesus like Moses taught the Law — the true meaning and practice of the Law as given by God.

    As a Prophet, He was calling the Jews back to the Law as God gave it, rather than what the Pharisees had made it. More on that below.

    The Standard of the Prophet
    As a Prophet, Jesus had to meet the same criteria that God set for all prophets; that is

    to uphold what God has said or be put to death.

    This ought not to be overlooked.
    Prophets in the Old Testament were to be put to death if what they said did not come to pass or if what they taught caused the people to stray from the way God had already spoken.

    The standard for a prophet is spelled out in the Law of Moses;

    “If a prophet or someone who has dreams arises among you and proclaims a sign or wonder to you, and that sign or wonder he has promised you comes about, but he says, ‘Let us follow other gods,’ which you have not known, ‘and let us worship them,’ do not listen to that prophet’s words or to that dreamer. For the Lord your God is testing you to know whether you love the Lord your God with all your heart and all your soul. You must follow the Lord your God and fear Him. You must keep His commands and listen to His voice; you must worship Him and remain faithful to Him. That prophet or dreamer must be put to death, because he has urged rebellion against the Lord your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt and redeemed you from the place of slavery, to turn you from the way the Lord your God has commanded you to walk. You must purge the evil from you.” (Deuteronomy 13: 1-5)

    The Teachings of Jesus and the Law

    Some people believe that the teachings of Jesus as recorded in the New Testament teach something different than what is taught in the Law of Moses or that He gave them new meaning or disregarded the Law; even breaking some of its commands. Finally, others would say Jesus fulfilled the Law and therefore the Law is no longer relevant.

    Let’s look at each of those a bit closer;

    Some people believe that the teachings of Jesus were very different than what was taught in the Old Testament; that the Old Testament was all about the law and the New Testament is all about grace. This idea is worth an article in itself at very least, but let’s look at this idea in terms of what Deuteronomy 13 says. If Jesus taught something different (e.g. grace) than what God had previously taught (e.g. Law), then He would have been leading us away from keeping God’s commands and this would have made Him a false prophet, deserving of death.
    Others say that Jesus gave ‘new meaning‘ to what was taught in the Old Testament but this too would have made Him a false prophet. If Jesus reinterpreted the Law of Moses, He would have been urging us to rebellion against the Lord and His commands and we would have been just to put Him to death.
    Still others say that Jesus broke all kinds of commands in the Law of Moses and often cite Him healing on the Sabbath as a common example. Jesus did not follow the “Oral Law” of the Pharisees and thus in their minds would have been viewed as breaking the Sabbath, but nowhere in Scripture are there any instances of Him violating any of the commands of the (Written) Law, as recorded in the Law of Moses. Furthermore, if Jesus had indeed broken the Law of Moses — the Law given by God, He would have committed a sin and no longer been the Lamb of God without blemish.
    Finally, others say Jesus fulfilled the Law and therefore the Law is no longer relevant. Jesus as the Prophet like Moses was calling the Jews back to a true observance of the Law of which He is the goal (Romans 10:4). Some translations use the word “end” for goal, but the word in Greek [telios] is more clearly understood in the context of Romans 10 as goal. In this context, Paul is referring to the Jews as disregarding the righteousness from God and attempting to establish their own righteousness. Again, this refers to the Pharisees insistence that the observance of “Oral Law” (i.e. ‘the traditions of men’) are equivalent in authority to the Written Law — which is the Law of God. Paul says that they [the Jews] have NOT submitted themselves to God’s righteousness [as embodied in the Law] — of whom Christ is the goal.
    None of the teachings of Jesus recorded anywhere in the New Testament teach something new or different than what is taught in the Law of Moses and at no time does Jesus ever break the commands of the Law, as given by God. In the following examples, we demonstrate that Jesus considered the Law not only relevant to teach, but to exhort believers to practice.

    Jesus upholds the Law

    Here are four examples as to how Jesus, as the Prophet like Moses, upholds the Law of Moses;

    Jesus and the Rich Young Man
    The synoptic gospels record the conversation between Jesus and the rich young man who wanted to know how to inherit eternal life.
    Jesus could have simply replied “follow Me” but He doesn’t. He reminds the man of the commandments of God in the Law forbidding adultery, murder, stealing, bearing false witness and honouring one’s parents (Mark 10:17-22; Matt 19:16-30; Luke 18:18-30). Jesus upholds the Law.

    It was when the young man said that he had kept these commands from the time he was a youth that Jesus said to sell all he had, distribute it to the poor and follow Him (Luke 18:18-23, Mt 19:19-21, Mark 10:17-21). Jesus continues to uphold the Law in His reply by telling the man to sell all his possessions. He was pointing out that money had become an idol to the man which kept him from keeping the first two commandments; which is to have the Lord as our God and no other gods before Him, and not to make an idol — which money had become to the man. Jesus upholds the Law all the way through this teaching.

    Jesus and the Jewish Lawyer
    In the conversation between Jesus and a Jewish lawyer recorded by Mark and Matthew, the issue of which is the greatest of the 613 commandments came up.
    A question had arisen among the Jews and was now put to Jesus as to which commandment was ‘the first of all’ (Mark 12:28), or ‘the greatest’ (Matt 22:34) — first and greatest both referring to the same thing.

    In Matthew’s and Mark’s account (Mark 12:31, Matt 22:39), Jesus replies to the Jewish lawyer saying that ‘the greatest and first commandment’ was to love God with all your heart, soul and strength (Deut 6:5) and adds ‘the second is this, “You shall love your neighbour as yourself” (Leviticus 19:18). Jesus upholds the Law.

    I remind you that this is the supposedly righteous “Creator of the Universe” speaking directly to Moses:

    EXODUS 21:
    7 “If a man sells his daughter as a servant, she is not to go free as male servants do. 8 If she does not please the master who has selected her for himself, he must let her be redeemed. He has no right to sell her to foreigners, because he has broken faith with her.9 If he selects her for his son, he must grant her the rights of a daughter.10 If he marries another woman, he must not deprive the first one of her food, clothing and marital rights.11 If he does not provide her with these three things, she is to go free, without any payment of money.”

    In this passage, Yahweh states that it’s okay for fathers to sell their daughters into permanent slavery, and he gives rules for what can and can’t be done with her afterwards. In the context of this passage, does being a good father entail getting a good price for your daughter on the slave market?

    2 “If you buy a Hebrew servant, he is to serve you for six years. But in the seventh year, he shall go free, without paying anything. 3 If he comes alone, he is to go free alone; but if he has a wife when he comes, she is to go with him. 4 If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the woman and her children shall belong to her master, and only the man shall go free.”

    In this passage, Yahweh establishes a condition under which a married male slave who is freed must leave behind his wife and children because they are his master’s property. Is this what religious folk mean when they talk of “family values”?

    26 “An owner who hits a male or female slave in the eye and destroys it must let the slave go free to compensate for the eye. 27 And an owner who knocks out the tooth of a male or female slave must let the slave go free to compensate for the tooth.”

    This section is where Yahweh gets progressive and establishes the world’s first workers comp law. If you poke out the eye of your slave, you have to set him free?!? How revolutionary and enlightened!

    And here is the most inspiring passage of all…

    20 “Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, 21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.”

    So if a slave-master beats his slave, he’s to be punished only if the slave dies from the beating (and only if a rod was used)? Hmmm, it’s pretty sweet to be a slave-master in Yahweh’s kingdom, isn’t it?


    I expected that everyone would easily recognize that all genocides were clearly wrong. But this is not the case. I am surprised to see that Jews defend their genocides and claim that they were justified. One of the reasons they offer is that the victims were so evil that they all deserved to be killed. Others said that the Israelites were in need of land, so God allowed them to conquer neighboring territories. And some even claim that anything God commands is morally right by definition and that we have no standing to question this or disobey his commands.

    It is really quite startling that these excuses are so similar to the justifications used by the perpetrators of genocide, like Bolsheviks, Nazis and Mao’s communists. The victims were simply unworthy of life, or they needed to acquire more territory for themselves, or they were just following orders. Even more unnerving is how indifferent these people are to the realities of genocide. They apparently have no problem with killing defenseless children and treating even infants as too evil to live. It’s like none of this seems real to them.
    But perhaps the most disturbing aspect is that of all the Jews I’ve discussed this with, not one of them has been willing to condemn their genocides. Not a single one. They have all tried to defend them.

    So, I’d like to issue a challenge to Jews.

    Can you acknowledge that genocide is wrong even if YOUR God commands it?

    Can you agree that genocide is never acceptable including the genocides of the Hebrew Bible?

    Are you capable as a Jew of condemning genocide without equivocation?

    If you refuse to condemn YOUR God’s genocides in the Hebrew Bible, then defend them. Just pick your favorite and tell us why you like it so darned much.

    Maybe you think it was especially cool that YOUR God burned people to death for complaining.

    Or that he sent fiery serpents to bite and kill people (again for complaining — this time about the lack of food and water). Just pick one and tell us why you love YOUR God so much for doing it.

    Why was the Holocaust bad, but a dozen holocausts in the Hebrew Bible are totally okay?


Post a Comment

Winter Watch

Discover more from Winter Watch

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading