On April 4, The New Nationalist (TNN) wrote an article that is now Defcon 1 timely: “South Africa’s Zuma Doubles Down on Commitment to White Ethnic Cleansing & National Suicide.” At that time, madman South African President Zuma and his cronies accused his own finance minister and voice of reason Pravin Gordhan of a conspiracy to take down the country. Gordhan had just returned home with warnings from international finance. After Gordhan was ignored and canned, the rating agencies downgraded RSA credit to junk status.
TNN’s premise in the article was that Jewish RSA oligarchs’ property will be under assault as well as remaining Afrikaner farmers, and that would be a whole new ballgame.
On Wednesday, we received more dire clues as to where this madness is heading. South Africa’s ruling African National Congress proposed at its fifth annual National Policy Conference that in addition to potentially nationalizing the country’s central bank, that land expropriation without compensation should be allowed where it is “necessary and unavoidable,” Zuma said.
The frontrunner to replace Zuma in December’s election is Zuma’s ex-wife, Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, who is a hardcore black racist and has made land redistribution from whites to blacks without compensation one of her main policies.
As a matter of policy, the concept of nationalizing central banks and having the Treasury issue currency is fundamentally sound. It is what Andrew Jackson did and was also carried out by Adolf Hitler to successfully turn around Germany’s shattered economy in the 1930s.
Unfortunately, such steps invite retaliation in the Rothschild finance system. If in addition, the capital and assets of the Jewish elites in particular are seized without compensation, the last plug will be pulled on the RSA.
At that point, the entire country will fall into abject misery along the lines experienced in Zimbabwe. If the talent behind RSA agriculture is removed, starvation will be a likely outcome.
The white people, many of whom are isolated and impoverished [see “South Africa Part I: The Plight of Poor Whites in South Africa”] will be scapegoated and genocided. As we asked in “South Africa Part II: The White Right of Return Movement —or Lack Thereof ” who is willing to take in the white Afrikaners? Most of Europe only wants “refugees” from the Middle East and Africa.
This should be an international issue. I am certain that once RSA collapses, it will be hell for the starving blacks living there as well. But in the earlier phases of this collapse, it will be white South Africans most vulnerable to a window of genocide. These people are not armed and are largely outnumbered and defenseless. They have no place to go. Who knows how many will end up in shallow graves at the end of some rural road. And who would ever know?
Therefore, it is other whites who need to come to the aid, defense and organization for the protection and rescue of white South Africans. TNN predicts western governments and corrupt NGOs will ignore this issue.
For whites, it is too late in the game to be guilt shamed and distracted by tawdry racist epithets. When I was trying to discuss this issue at Reddit’s r/southafrica (before being outright banned), a number of wags there said these little blond-haired Afrikaner kids “deserved it.” This was the closest I’ve ever come to totally losing it online. Those nasty elements were very lucky they weren’t in the same room with me.
I have a very bad feeling about this situation. It bothers me emotionally at a number of levels. It should be a rallying call. Personally, I believe finding new refuge for these folks is paramount.
Suidlanders is organizing for South African white protection and civil defense. Their site is here and, of course, donations are accepted. There is a blog and because they are on the ground there, it’s a good source for following developments. Sadly it also sort of looks like a last stand position is being taken. Please correct me if I’m wrong.
Tragically, & too often in history, it is not until a great deal of blood has been spilled, that people wake up to certain issues … This, sadly, may be one of those times
Here in Dutch-speaking Europe – where we understand much of spoken & written Afrikaans that evolved from Dutch – this is particularly poignant. Confused Europeans don’t understand, that it is not a denial that there were crimes or oppression under colonialism or apartheid, just to give a safe haven to people who are essentially distant cousins & now in jeopardy … & who could start filling our labour needs the first days they are here. But with old prejudices, & lack of favourable media on this issue, it will not have traction until & unless blood is regularly on tv screens, & maybe not even then.
Something parallel at the moment … thousands of Russians dead in Donbass East Ukraine, whom Vladimir Putin did not protect, after inviting them, post-Crimea, to hold a referendum on joining Russia. For a lot of Russians, their blood boils over this. Putin’s ‘popularity’ per polls is partly artificial; in Russia people fear to diss the tsar, plus in polls they also want to convey they are not ‘pro-Western’ … but Russian nationalism is huge, & there is really no good answer as to why the Chabad-&-oligarch-tied Putin did not move in & partition Ukraine after the satanic Odessa massacre … sanctions etc were coming anyway … so why were thousands of Russians left to die … on Russia’s own doorstep?
Russ, wonder if you have tried to comment on the popular Unz Review, they have articles on the South Africa situation as well, & a lot of people who like to discuss these things … Here’s an article from 2 weeks ago with 88 comments:
https://www.unz.com/imercer/the-american-architects-of-the-south-african-catastrophe/
Also, have seen your TNN comments on Aangirfan, where I have linked you as well … but one thing to note is that when you comment on a Google blogger site like hers – Google has a curiously outdated blog platform, obviously on purpose from those Google gangsters – you should do the whole href etc link code … otherwise your comment only provides a ‘flat’ non-link, the url merely printed out & not an actual link … someone will need to copy the line & then paste etc in order to get to the TNN page you suggest
I’ll read the article shortly, so thanks. Mercer’s a Jewish neo-con. Her father was a prominent anti-Apartheid activist before fleeing SA. Cum grano salis is all I’d say about her pro-white advocacy.
I see someone has called her out on omitting her rabbi father’s contribution. Nor is mention made of the crucial role played by Jewish communists in the career of Nelson Mandela and the ANC, nor their Jewish sympathizers in the West.
Counter-Currents plugs the lacuna:
https://www.counter-currents.com/2011/06/nelson-mandela-and-the-jews/
I’m so sick of seeing skinny black kids with flies on their face and then a Judeo Christian ‘guilting’ us into sending money; or buying a goat. When will these Judeos start showing starving white children whose parents have just been slaughtered, pleading for the West to send money??? Hirelings! All of them.
Thanks Jews.
There’s plenty wrong with the Greenbacker theory. It just means Treasury gets to decide the preferred clientele rather than commercial banks. And Hitler’s economic miracle was a chimera. Spent all the gold reserves and amassed large debts. CPI figures massaged.
http://reason.com/archives/1999/08/01/nazi-economics
In the early days of the colony there was competition between different monies and people were wary of depositing money in banks (tar and feathers rather than bail-outs). I believe that after worldwide economic conflagration, money will return to a tangible form, the historic norm. And future monetary historians with write up the last century with bemusement and sadness.
The National Socialist system issued bills of exchange (not money backed by debt) in exchange for labor:
Ellen Brown writes in Web of Debt:
Hitler began his national credit program by devising a plan of public works. Projects earmarked for funding included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new buildings, roads, bridges, canals and port facilities. The projected cost of the various programs was fixed at one billion units of the national currency.
One billion non-inflationary bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury Certificates, were then issued against this cost. Millions of people were put to work on these projects, and the workers were paid with the Treasury Certificates. This government-issued money wasn’t backed by gold, but it was backed by something of real value. It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the government. Hitler said, “for every mark that was issued we required the equivalent of a mark’s worth of work done or goods produced.” The workers then spent the Certificates on other goods and services, creating more jobs for more people.
See: How Once A Torn Country Liberated Itself From Debt Slavery
http://www.winterwatch.net/2016/11/28/the-monetary-program-under-national-socialism/
Yeah, I know of her. She’s not trained in economics.
Make-work programs are wealth-destroying. But this is the century of Keynes, where economic activity, productive or otherwise, is confused with wealth accretion. It’s production, not consumption, that drives the economy. Mind you, this is just common sense, which people grasped intuitively until about a century ago, when the economics profession started to go off the rails.
Hitler’s, “for every mark that was issued we required the equivalent of a mark’s worth of work done or goods produced” is just a tautology.
Ellen’s confused economic theory is addressed here:
https://www.garynorth.com/public/department143.cfm
Japan, by the way, have amassed a staggering public debt on buildings, roads, bridges, canals and port facilities, etc.. How they plan to pay this debt off is anyone’s guess. That the debt is owned by Japanese investors won’t make the problem go away, either.
https://tradingeconomics.com/japan/government-debt-to-gdp
Also, Germany “liberated” herself from foreign creditors by going to war. Tsarist government securities were not honored by the Bolshevik regime, either.
Some 600,000 people have been murdered in post-apartheid South Africa. This is just since 1994.
The Apartheid government, which was by far the best government South Africa has ever had, was responsible for a mere 3,000 deaths during it’s entire existence- this according to the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. This figure of 3,000 includes all the police killings, all the deaths in all the Apartheid governments foreign wars, everything.
Contrast the record of the Apartheid government with that of the US government, which since 1942 has killed some 8-10 million people. THAT’s evil.