There’s evidence that presidential candidate (((Bernie Sanders))) may have been controlled opposition, and it’s quite compelling.
Late Friday, Wikileaks tweeted:
Sanders had non-aggression pact with Clinton who had “leverage” to enforce it Robby Mook (“re47”) email reveals https://t.co/WcQ7wVRmSE pic.twitter.com/wLYTSHVqKj
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) November 5, 2016
The statement Sanders made that caught Clinton’s ire was pretty tame in the greater scheme of things. He criticized Clinton for “living large” and being disconnected from working people. If that statement was over the line to Mook, then that indicates how restrained he expected Sanders to be as controlled opposition. But Sanders never touched on the deeper unbridled corruption of the Clinton Foundation, play for play. Sanders dismissed the larger issue of HRC’s email server abuses, saying Americans are just tired of hearing about it.
It also indicates just how weak HRC was as a candidate in that she barely prevailed over her weak-punching, controlled opposition. Sanders:
Theoretically you can be a multi-billionaire and in fact be very concerned about the issues of working people. Theoretically that’s true. When you hustle money like that, you don’t sit in restaurants like this. You sit in restaurants where you spend, I don’t know what they spend, hundreds of dollars for dinner and so forth. That’s the world you are accustomed to. And that’s the worldview that you adopt. I’m not going to condemn Hillary and Bill Clinton because they’ve made a lot of money. That type of wealth has the potential to isolate you from the reality of the world.
In this article it is difficult to tell who said what about whom.
It was pretty clear near the middle of the election that Bernie was a distraction, that the Hitlery team had planted him and that they would never let him win. I wondered for a while whether Bernie might go rogue once he realized that he could actually beat her, but when he didn’t react to the revelation that she had sabotaged his poll numbers to discredit him, I knew that it was theatre. There were stories that he was beaten up afterwards for some moves he may have made to disentangle himself from the deal, but they were probably designed to minimize the fallout with his constituency. He purchased a $700,000 property somewhere in Vermont, it was shared, shortly after he dropped out of the race. Epic scamming this time, everyone was hoodwinked- democrats, republicans, everyone! Those who didn’t vote at all had the right idea. If only we could get it together just once and all not vote!
Interesting website. Associated with Rengade, perhaps?
Wasn’t Bernie doing much better than Hillary in the primaries? (And she was using dirty tricks with state party money.) Didn’t the DNC have to pull campaign data/IT tricks to try to damage him? Why was Seth Rich murdered? IIRC, there was a lot more going on that this thin soup.