5 Comments on Raw Deal with Fetzer, Hoquiam and Winter

  1. Strange that fetzer and his semite can’t think one step ahead now that they are patting themselves on the back for figuring out the MO. Clearly the script is for the the Epstein thing blow up for tumpy just in time to elect sanders/Harris or some worse satanist/commie. Can’t say that on the show, spoiler altert. Finally makes sense why they never stop ramming the Epstein script when back at the ranch small children and babies are pedo heaven. Witney webb and prince Andrew all keeping Epstein alive for the “big reveal”, some 17 yr old.blonde yeah right

  2. Russ, why do you allow Dr. Fetzer to continually mislead us? Jim states he made a mistake at Sandy Hook by not presenting the case correctly, not to mention that he represented himself! With such an important case wouldn’t he get the best lawyer team possible to prosecute this slam dunk case??
    Then Jim goes on and on, every show he does, he repeats the same misinformation about the Charlie Kirk shooting! Tyler Robinson has the barrel of the rifle in his trousers when jumping off the roof-WRONG! Fetzer sticks to the same dis-info about how Tyler would’ve punctured his abdomen! The video clearly shows there is something long and straight under the towel he was carrying (much like a barrel of a rifle. Sure Robinson is a set-up patsy- that part is easy! Let me ask you Russ- How in the hell could the AI GUYS insert fake blood onto cellphone cameras?? Is this even asked, this makes me think you and Hoquiam aren’t being objective with the conversation in hearing this theory.
    And if you guys would continue to search for clue and do more research you would see that there was blood on the crew helping Charlie!!!
    Fetzer states that ABC TV used a video of the crisis actors running away!??- So how and when did that happen?? Ridiculous again. This video is moments after the shooting after Charlie was taking thru the tunnel directly behind the tent, with the audience running away! COME ON MAN I LIKE YOUR SITE FOR INFO BUT YOU NEED TO REING IN FETZER!!

    • There are three independent individuals on the show. I don’t control and certainly don’t “reign in” Jim and do politely state my views when they differ. There is the good, and the bad, but I like the show’s format and continue on. Jim can be controversial and I don’t agree with everything he says anymore than I do what you just said. The disagreements haven’t reached a point where I am conflicted and wish to quit the show.

      I think Kirk was assassinated, Jim and Joaquim think it was staged. if you are claiming there was blood on the crew then produce links and clear images showing so. The running on the roof and jumping off of it was entirely CGI. Jim has said so as well.

      Jim tried to get good legal representation in his case but was blacklisted by the legal community. I don’t think he has the means to hire lawyers. Therefore your argument is a non sequitur.

  3. Thank you for the response Russ, I am not trying to be some troll. We all want answers. Your site is one of the best researched and interesting on so many topics-thanks for the education and peaking my curiosity to dive deeper into history. I like Jim and was counting on him to reveal some truth to the American public with his Sandy Hook trial. As we all know Alex Jones is a narcissistic deceiver, we never had any faith in him to defend his stance on SH.
    My problem with Dr. Fetzer is that he now states ” if evidence leads us to another conclusion then we must change our statements about the facts at hand” or something to that effect, yet he continues to say Charlie is most likely living on an island near New Zealand! Why not Gilligan’s Island then?
    As far as CGI being used, perhaps on Robinson, but the statement from Fetzer that Charlies ring jumped from one finger to the next is him not looking into the evidence once again. Charlie wore a fidget ring with a 3/4 backing, he would remove it and play around with it in some of his previous videos. It is not CGI as Fetzer claims, he is only looking at blurry magnified images from poor video to come to his conclusions. I could go on and on and I will try to send you links to the blood on hands and ground as more evidence. I believe Charlie was shot from behind or from the side at a 45 degree angle and the bullet or shrapnel came out his neck and into the ground where they immediately covered over with concrete tiles!
    Bottom line- Why wouldn’t Fetzer want to pursue the true killers, perhaps Israel or Mossad or Greed Inc. Deep Staters? Instead every time he reads an article about more evidence coming out, he interrupts the story to promote and his impossible deception theory in front of a live crowd with cameras in hand-way to risky to pull off!! And the story about the ABC video of crisis actors that unintentionally got released -no way. Can we trust that his Wisconsin Supreme Court case will ever see the light of day? Doubt it!

Post a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Winter Watch

Discover more from Winter Watch

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading