On the 10th anniversary of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, expert witnesses gathered at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada, to provide evidence-based research that called into question the official story. This was known as “The Toronto Hearings on 9/11.”
Over a period of four days, these experts in structural engineering, physics, chemistry and history gave researched and professional testimony to an international panel of distinguished judges. The panel of judges, in conjunction with the steering committee, would go on to publish their final analysis of the evidence provided.
More:
To explore the question of who conducted this crime, see Christopher Bollyn’s book “Solving 9/11,” which is available as a pdf file.
Thanks for the post. I dutifully watched Decade of Deception.. Good but incomplete. No mention of the simulated plane impacts (physically impossible as they appear on TV) nor the anomalous damage wrought on cars in FDR Drive over a mile away from the “plane” crash. The micronization of steel and other refractory building materials wasn’t really satisfactorily dealt with either. The strange rusting and twisting of beams was mentioned but no explanation offered.
Also, while I accept that molten metal was observed, I don’t see that this accompanied by great heat (I’m taking the NASA heat map with a pinch of salt) And smoke was still emerging six months after the event?? Cars engine blocks were melted but gas tanks didn’t explode and there was that filing cabinet that “melted” but had visibly unsinged paper stuck in it.
I believe some revolutionary, new destructive force was used alongside conventional means (explosives, thermate, etc.) in the event.
Short of a complete regime change and the arrival of the “Untouchables”, you and I will never determine this case with much precision.
True, the laws of the land will prevail long past my death, but the laws of physics will outlast even the regime. It satisfies me that the Official Version is untenable, contrived and motivated.
ala Rod from God.
It’s okay though, all the evidence in the SEC offices were destroyed. Also, aircraft aluminum was ten times denser that day….
Seeing plane crashes on video and remnants of plane crashes into other objects, the fuselage is usually vaporized. My go to evidence video is the TransAsia flight that hit the bridge/freeway in 2015. Its wing clips a concrete (not reinforced steel) road divider and disintegrates instantly. Most people don’t understand the density of aircraft aluminum but only see a large “metal object” and think, man that must be heavy.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/500942/Plane-damaged-by-bird-nose-caved-in-EgyptAir-London-Heathrow-Cairo-Boeing
Mercifully, no sea-gull hit the Twins.
http://tinyurl.com/gwfqb9u
A couple of Israeli childrens’ Purim costume.
The impacts were not simulated — the planes were modified for this trick so they would penetrate and leave no evidence that these were NOT the same planes that were hijacked. Note the anomalous “pod” on the bottom. This is not a conventional airliner and no flight data recorders were found.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=methodical+illusion
9/11, the day physics took a one day vacation.