Jeffrey Epstein Offers Insights into the Crime Syndicate Swamp


A core contention of Winter Watch has been that the American system (aka sistema) is thoroughly captured and compromised by what we call the kakistocratic Crime Syndicate. Incidentally, the use of the word “elites” is a misnomer and a misdirection. There is a class of undeserving operatives who operate with impunity outside of the law.

Par for the course on how the sistema works, we learn that wealthy financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein reportedly drew $128,000 from his nonprofit Florida Science Foundation to pay off-duty deputies from Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office to “guard him” during his 2008 work-release program.

Epstein then continued to have visits from young women that allegedly resulted in sexual liaisons during his so called jail term in Florida, a lawyer for one of his accusers said Tuesday.

The Epstein case is and will no doubt continue to provide stark examples of this in-your-face systemic malfeasance.

Recall that the former U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida Alexander Acosta reached an agreement in 2008 with Epstein’s attorneys in which Epstein was allowed to plead guilty to two state-level prostitution solicitation charges related to a 17-year-old girl.  Eighteen is the age of consent in Florida.

The secret agreement was reportedly struck before investigators had even finished interviewing all the alleged victims, and it included protections for some of Epstein’s alleged co-conspirators.

This Acosta agreement thus enabled the entire issue of underage sex trafficking to go under the radar and escape legal scrutiny.

Only after Epstein’s recent arrest did another key element emerge about the case.

While Acosta was prosecuting the Espstein case in 2008, someone approached Acosta and told him Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and that any information beyond that was “above my pay grade,” the Daily Beast reported, citing a former senior White House official, who said Acosta offered this information during interviews with the Trump administration for the position of U.S. Labor Secretary.

This begs the question of just what kind of sistema trumps the top law enforcement attorney in the jurisdiction in question. Indeed, nobody — and I mean nobody — has gone down this rabbit hole. A non-corrupted sistema would have other law enforcement and non-lying media asking just who relayed this communication to Acosta.

In the non-cartoon world, we have the Trivium Method. And, yes, one Trivium element is called “who.” In this Acosta conspiracy query, “who” is the starting point. We already have what, where and when, and also why, the latter being that Epstein was a protected “asset.” Applying Holmesian deduction, we could deduce that “intelligence,” loosely defined, would know that Epstein was above Acosta’s pay grade. But to determine which intelligence would require the names of those communicating the “what” with Acosta.

Ultimately, there should be a multitude of whos in this affair, but so far they have not been forthcoming. In fact, we suspect just a few targeted individuals will be thrown under the bus, thus affording us another clear view of the Crime Syndicate in action.

Acosta at a press conference was asked for more color shortly before his ass was fired as Secretary of Labor. His answer was evasive. He told reporters that he couldn’t answer questions about whether Epstein was allegedly tied to an intelligence agency in some way, because he was prohibited from doing so due to “Justice Department regulations.”

Yes, all so conveniently ad hoc and typical of how the sistema works.

Just two months after his “release”from “jail” Epstein was seen hob nobbing with assorted mucky mucks at a soiree at the home of David and Julia Koch. Epstein can be seen in photos chatting with Jonathan Farklas, Leon Black and Wilbur Ross. He was sitting right near Rudy Giuliani,’ wrote Page Six at the time. Steve Mnuchin was also present, as were “hedge fund” billionaires Steven Schwarzman and Henry Kravis.

Other details of the Epstein affair provide additional clues as to who and what this so-called intelligence are. Are these units hiding in plain view, operating under the cover of intelligence and in name only?

For instance, it has been determined from manifest documents filed [see page 11] in the West Palm Beach Federal Court that Epstein flew an aircraft with same tail number as a State Department Bronco used under contract by DynCorp. This same plane that was involved in DynCorp sex trafficking of minors in the Balkans. The details on the revolving tail number can be gleaned here (link works).

This would mean that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked underage girls using aircraft of the same tail number and during the same time period as DynCorp when they trafficked minors in Bosnia and other parts of the Balkan states.

What purpose do Crime Syndicate operatives have for gathering a stable of underage girls? Yes, currying favors is one, but more important is sexual compromise (kompromat).

‘My Super Bowl trophy’: Epstein ‘boasted’ about selling Prince Andrew’s ‘secrets’ to Mossad spy

The Epstein-Maxwell Kompromat Operation Likely Ensnared Thousands

Dyncorp was one of the products of the post-9/11 reorganization to privatize and expand military and security contracts.

Wired wrote (good link) of the importance of DynCorp in 2003:

DynCorp represents nothing less than the future of national security. While outfits like Raytheon make their money developing weapons systems, DynCorp offers the military an alternative to itself. In 2002, the company took in $2.3 billion doing what you probably thought was Pentagon work. DynCorp planes and pilots fly the defoliation missions that are the centerpiece of Plan Colombia.

Armed DynCorp employees constitute the core of the police force in Bosnia. DynCorp troops protect Afghan president Hamid Karzai. DynCorp manages the border posts between the US and Mexico, many of the Pentagon’s weapons-testing ranges, and the entire Air Force One fleet of presidential planes and helicopters. During the Persian Gulf War, it was DynCorp employees, not soldiers, who serviced and rearmed American combat choppers, and it’s DynCorp’s people, not military personnel, who late last year began “forward deploying” equipment and ammunition to the Middle East in preparation for war with Iraq.

DynCorp inventories everything seized by the Justice Department’s Asset Forfeiture Program, runs the Naval Air Warfare Center at Patuxent River, Maryland, and is producing the smallpox and anthrax vaccines the government may use to inoculate everyone in the United States.

Actually, even mainstream Lugenpresse, such as The Huffington Post, reported trafficking scandals involving DynCorp in Bosnia. The now-scrubbed story can be found in archives. (link is good)

DynCorp was involved in a sex slavery scandal in Bosnia in 1999, with its employees accused of rape and the buying and selling of girls as young as 12. Dyncorp, hired to perform police duties for the U.N. and aircraft maintenance for the U.S. Army, were implicated in prostituting the children, whereas the company’s Bosnia site supervisor filmed himself raping two women. A number of employees were transferred out of the country, but with no legal consequences for them.

This was one of two cases involving DynCorp and sexual scandal in Bosnia. The other, involved airplane mechanic Ben Johnston who sued DynCorp, alleging he was sacked because he had uncovered evidence that Dyncorp employees were involved in ‘sexual slavery.‘

One figure Winter Watch does consider as the real deal is former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, who ran headlong into Dyncorp before she was “defeated” for re-election. In 2006, she grilled Donald Rumsfeld about the trillions of dollars missing from the Pentagon, as well as DynCorp’s involvement in human trafficking:

“Mr. Secretary, I watched President Bush deliver a moving speech at the United Nations in September 2003 in which he mentioned the crisis of the sex trade. The president called for the punishment of those involved in this horrible business. But at the very moment of that speech, DynCorp was exposed for having been involved in the buying and selling of young women and children. While all of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon contract to administer the smallpox and anthrax vaccines and is now working on a plague vaccine through the joint Vaccine Acquisition Program. Mr. Secretary, is it policy of the U.S. government to reward companies that traffic in women and little girls?”

To dig deeper into the crime of human harvesting, I recommend the following talk by Kathryn Bolkovac, who was with the International Police Task Force that was arranged by DynCorp Aerospace. Her story was the basis of the movie “The Whistleblower.”

Read “Trump Brings in Human-Harvester Kingpins as Intelligence Advisers”

The chief mucky muck of Dyncorp was Steve Feinberg, a major Jewish hedge fund manager and Republican donor. In 2016, he served on the Trump Economic Advisory Council during Trump’s presidential campaign, donating nearly $1.5 million to pro-Trump PACs and, alongside other financiers, co-hosted a $50,000 per-person fundraising dinner for Trump and the Republican National Committee (RNC).

On May 11, 2018, and far far away from draining the swamp, now U.S. President Donald Trump named Feinberg to head the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board. Whodathunk. The fox guarding the hen house.

16 Comments on Jeffrey Epstein Offers Insights into the Crime Syndicate Swamp

  1. The videos at the Amazing Polly website are recommended viewing at the highest level for peeling the onion of the Epstein saga. It is an amazing onion indeed. A stinking swamp that may be the saga that sums up the kakistocracy and it’s minions. It is not just about the sex and blackmail. Cannot imagine that these videos will be around too much longer.

  2. I remember the billions of dollars reported to have gone missing during Hillary Clinton’s time in the State Department. Almost no media coverage or analysis of the “scandal” during her run for the presidency. It was pretty far down the list of her scandals, but was still known. It was certainly less “mainstream” news. The no questions asked reminds me of Epstein. If the money was “lost” to organizations like this, it would make sense why no one pushed for answers.

      • I like amazing polly as well. I have had that feeling as well, and have noticed other ‘truthers’ calling out others as working on the inside. Once guy said that David Icke, Alex Jones and Max Igan are working for the NWO. How do we know for sure, and would it matter. ?
        I have always personally liked alex jones as an entertainer. I would find it very disappointing if he was not who he portrays himself to be, the tip of the spear against the NWO.

  3. We are noticing a new trend of supposedly dead links in our articles. Most of the time these links are still good but sometimes require capchas. I am not exactly sure what this is all about but it strikes us as a new form of suppression.

    • It’s exactly that, suppression using tech to identify your streams and reroute to capture/record/direct. Same sort of issues can happen with either your own webserver(s) or using a bonified hosting service if you are really being targeted for suppression and generally making life difficult for WW webzine. Hang in there – we’re out there.

  4. Yep, Amazing Polly does some great stuff. As for calling the “elites” the kakistocracy (since it is a misnomer to consider these psychopaths as “elites”), I prefer “criminal psychopathic elites” or just “psychos”. Now I think AJ and Icke could be working as controlled ops for the NWO, but Igan? Heck I never even heard of the guy until I started visiting….Igan seems to be exposing a lot of the totalitarianism going on in Aussie land these days….

  5. “A core contention of Winter Watch has been that the American system (aka sistema) is thoroughly captured and compromised by what we call the kakistocratic Crime Syndicate. Incidentally, the use of the word “elites” is a misnomer and a misdirection. There is a class of undeserving operatives who operate with impunity outside of the law.”


    • Whoops! Second attempt.


      P.S. Guess Pearl Jam does not like WW. Funny because I do not like Pearl Jam, but the song seemed to fit the quotation.

      • Wow, those free loving hippies in Pearl Jam hate “free love” and open dialogue. Not really the band of the people that they sell themselves as.

        Wonder what happens when we try international:

        If this fails RW, please delete all three.



  6. Okay, let’s go mainstream for a moment (Wikipedia):

    “Sale to CSC, IPO, and purchase by Cerberus Capital (2003-2020)

    In March 2003 DynCorp and its subsidiaries were acquired by Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) for approximately $914 million. Less than two years later, CSC announced the sale of three DynCorp units (DynCorp International, DynMarine and certain DynCorp Technical Services contracts) to Veritas Capital Fund, LP for $850 million.[30] After the sale, CSC retained the rights to the name “DynCorp” and the new company became DynCorp International.

    In 2006 DynCorp International went public on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DCP.

    On April 12, 2010, DynCorp International announced a conditional deal to be acquired by private equity investment firm Cerberus Capital Management for $17.55 per share ($1 billion). The deal was agreed on 7 July 2010.[34]

    In December 2011 the company hired Michael Thibault, former co-chairman and commissioner of the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan (CWC), as vice president of government finance and compliance. Thibault worked for many years at the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), serving as Deputy Director from 1994 to 2005. In 2011 Dyncorp set a company record with 12,300 new hires, bringing the total number of employees to 27,000.
    Acquisition by Amentum (2020-Present)

    On November 23, 2020, Amentum, a contractor supporting U.S. federal and allied governments, announced that it has closed the acquisition of DynCorp International, a provider of sophisticated aviation, logistics, training, intelligence and operational solutions in over 30 countries worldwide. The combination has also created one of the largest providers of mission critical support services to government customers, with 34,000 team members in 105 countries around the world.”

    IT NEVER DIES!!!!!

    The company simply moves on. See the “COMPANY” began in Venice, Italy under a strict mandate (Charter) to do a job. benefit the shareholders through proceeds form the job and then go away. The Dutch took the concept somewhat global, but kept to the original idea. Then the British came along. They built never ending companies with a global “footprint”. Following this was the Anglo-American empire with the American 14th Amendment that provided a company (or fictions entity) with the exact same legal rights as a natural born human. That is where the fun begins…in fact I often wonder if the whole United States “Civil War” was fought for this end. It is a very odd repercussion.

    Now for a movie:



    The official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud published in 1935 was “Translated into English with Notes, Glossary and Indices” by such eminent Talmudic scholars as Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, Rabbi Dr. Israel W. Slotki, M.A., Litt.D., The Reverend Dr. A. Cohen, M.A.’, Ph.D., Maurice Simon, M.A., and the Very Reverend The Chief Rabbi Dr. J.H. Hertz wrote the “Foreword” for the Soncino Edition of the Talmud. The Very Reverend Rabbi Hertz was at the time the Chief Rabbi of England.
    The world’s leading authorities on the Talmud confirm that the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud translated into English follows the original texts with great exactness. It is almost a word-for-word translation of the original texts. In his famous classic “The History of the Talmud,” Michael Rodkinson, the leading authority on the Talmud, in collaboration with the celebrated Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise states:

    “THEJEWISH TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD. During the twenty centuries of its existence…IT SURVIVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and not only has the power of its foes FAILED TO DESTROY EVEN A SINGLE LINE, but it has not even been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time.

    The Talmud, then, is the written form of that which, in the time of Jesus, was called the Traditions of the Elders, and to which he makes frequent allusions.
    — Rabbi Michael L. Rodkinson (1)

    Or consider this from The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, in the entry


    The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.
    Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature, and round it are gathered a number of Midrashim, partly legal (Halachic) and partly works of edification (Haggadic). This literature, in its oldest elements, goes back to a time before the beginning of the Common Era, and comes down into the Middle Ages. Through it all run the lines of thought which were first drawn by the Pharisees, and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism.
    — R. Travers Herford for the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. (2)

    Rabbi Dr. Louis Finkelstein, Instructor of Talmud, and later president of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, writes:

    Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When the Jew reads his prayers, he is reciting formulae prepared by pre-Maccabean scholars; when he dons the cloak prescribed for the Day of Atonement and Passover Eve, he is wearing the festival garment of ancient Jerusalem; when he studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies.
    — Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein (3)

    SANHEDRIN, 55b-55a: “What is meant by this? – Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? – Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be bestiality abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5).”
    This “divine truth” which “a whole people venerate” of which “not a single letter of it is missing” and today “is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its history” is illustrated by the additional verbatim quotations which follow:

    SANHEDRIN, 69b “Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit…All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.

    KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as a girl who is injured by a piece of wood' ".
    (footnotes) "(5). Lit.,
    says’. (6) Lit., `here’, that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.”

    KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood(a dildo).”
    (footnotes) “(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”

    ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. “R. Naham b. Isaac said: They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it…From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.

    SOTAH, 26b. “R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) – the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10)…As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene act?”

    SANHEDRIN, 55b: “A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea).”
    (footnotes) “(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his neighbor’s wife’ is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse.”

    Of the “sacred” Talmudic teachings of the “Sages,” preserved since 500 A.D. and taught more widely today than ever before in Talmud-Torah schools in the U.S.A., perhaps nothing better illustrates “fools” with “reprobate minds” than the teaching in the Talmud book of Yebamoth that spittle on the top of the bed curtain proves that a wife has been guilty of adultery, as only lying down face upwards could she have spit up on it. Spitting several feet straight up!

    The Talmud states:
    “When a peddler leaves a house and the woman within is fastening her sinnar [breech-cloth] … . If spittle is found on the upper part of the curtained bed she must, said Rabbi, go.”
    Footnote: “Even if there were no witnesses that misconduct took place.”
    Further footnote: “Only the woman lying face upwards could have spat on the spot. Intercourse may, therefore, be suspected.”

    Second century Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai, one of Judaism’s very greatest rabbis and a creator of Kabbalah, sanctioned pedophilia — permitting molestation [raping] of baby girls even younger than three! He proclaimed, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and a day is permitted to marry a priest.”
    (1) Subsequent rabbis refer to ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia as “halakah”, or binding Jewish law.
    (2) Has ben Yohai, child rape advocate, been disowned by modern Jews? Hardly. Today, in ben Yohai’s hometown of Meron, Israel, tens of thousands of orthodox and ultra-orthodox Jews gather annually for days and nights of singing and dancing in his memory.

    References to pedophilia abound in the Talmud. They occupy considerable sections of Treatises Kethuboth and Yebamoth and are enthusiastically endorsed by the Talmud’s definitive legal work, Treatise Sanhedrin.

    The rabbis of the Talmud are notorious for their legal hair-splitting, and quibbling debates. But they share rare agreement about their right to molest three year old girls. In contrast to many hotly debated issues, hardly a hint of dissent rises against the prevailing opinion (expressed in many clear passages) that pedophilia is not only normal but scriptural as well! It’s as if the rabbis have found an exalted truth whose majesty silences debate.

    Because the Talmudic authorities who sanction pedophilia are so renowned, and because pedophilia as “halakah” is so explicitly emphasized, not even the translators of the Soncino edition of the Talmud (1936) dared insert a footnote suggesting the slightest criticism. They only comment: “Marriage, of course, was then at a far earlier age than now.” (3)

    In fact, footnote 5 to Sanhedrin 60b rejects the right of a Talmudic rabbi to disagree with ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia: “How could they [the rabbis], contrary to the opinion of R. Simeon ben Yohai, which has scriptural support, forbid the marriage of the young proselyte?” (4)
    1 Yebamoth 60b, p. 402.
    2 Yebamoth 60b, p. 403.
    3 Sanhedrin 76a.
    4 In Yebamoth 60b, p. 404, Rabbi Zera disagrees that sex with girls under three years and one day should be endorsed as halakah.

    It was in Babylon after the exile under Nebuchadnezzar in 597 BC that Judaism’s leading sages probably began to indulge in pedophilia. Babylon was the staggeringly immoral capitol of the ancient world. For 1600 years, the world’s largest population of Jews flourished within it. [Ashkenazik Shinar (‘sin’) was a stone throw away from Sodom and Gomorrah – Any questions?]

    As an example of their evil, Babylonian priests said a man’s religious duty included regular sex with temple prostitutes. Bestiality was widely tolerated. So Babylonians hardly cared whether a rabbi married [raped] a three year old girl.

    But with expulsion of the Jews [‘Edomites, Pharisees, Ashkenazim, Khazars, Sephardim’] in the 11th century AD, mostly to western Christian lands, Gentile tolerance of Jewish pedophilia abruptly ended.
    Still, a shocking contradiction lingers:

    If Jews want to revere the transcendent wisdom and moral guidance of the Pharisees and their Talmud, they must accept the right of their greatest ancient sages to violate children. To this hour, no synod of Judaism has repudiated their vile practice.


    What exactly did these sages say?
    The Pharisees justified child rape by explaining that a boy of nine years was not a “man” Thus they exempted him from God’s Mosaic Law: “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination” (Leviticus. 18:22) One passage in the Talmud gives permission for a woman who molested her young son to marry a high priest. It concludes,
    “All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not.” (5)

    Because a boy under 9 is sexually immature,he can’t “throw guilt” on the active offender, morally or legally. (6)
    A woman could molest a young boy without questions of morality even being raised: “…the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act.” (7) The Talmud also says, “A male aged nine years and a day who cohabits with his deceased brother’s wife acquires her (as wife).” (8) Clearly, the Talmud teaches that a woman is permitted to marry and have sex with a nine year old boy.
    5 Sanhedrin 69b.
    6 Sanhedrin 55a.
    7 Footnote 1 to Kethuboth 11b.
    8 Sanhedrin 55b.

    In contrast to Simeon ben Yohai’s dictum that sex with a little girl is permitted under the age of three years, the general teaching of the Talmud is that the rabbi must wait until a day after her third birthday. She could be taken in marriage simply by the act of rape. [these were the ‘precursors’ of Hillary, Pelosi, Kagan, Napolitano, Ginsburg, Boxer, Albright, Abzug, Goldman, Livni, ad nauseam]

    R. Joseph said: “Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his.” (Sanh. 55b)

    “A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by cohabitation …” (Yeb. 57b)

    A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabited with her she becomes his. (Sanh. 69a, 69b, also discussed in Yeb. 60b)

    It was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated:
    “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the women children that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, and Phineas (who was priest, the footnote says) surely was with them.” (Yeb. 60b)

    [The Talmud says such three year and a day old girls are] “… fit for cohabitation … But all women children, that have not known man by lying with him, it must be concluded that Scripture speaks of one who is fit for cohabitation.” (Footnote to Yeb. 60b)

    The example of Phineas, a priest, himself marrying an underage virgin of three years is considered by the Talmud as proof that such infants are “fit for cohabitation.”

    The Talmud teaches that an adult woman’s molestation of a nine year old boy is “not a sexual act” and cannot “throw guilt” upon her because the little boy is not truly a “man.” (9) But they use opposite logic to sanction rape of little girls aged three years and one day: Such infants they count as “women,” sexually mature and fully responsible to comply with the requirements of marriage.

    The Talmud footnotes 3 and 4 to Sanhedrin 55a clearly tell us when the rabbis considered a boy and girl sexually mature and thus ready for marriage.

    “At nine years a male attains sexual matureness… The sexual matureness of woman is reached at the age of three.”

    The Pharisees were hardly ignorant of the trauma felt by molested children. To complicate redress, the Talmud says a rape victim must wait until she was of age before there would be any possibility of restitution. She must prove that she lived and would live as a devoted Jewess, and she must protest the loss of her virginity on the very hour she comes of age.
    “As soon as she was of age one hour and did not protest she cannot protest any more.” (10)

    The Talmud defends these strict measures as necessary to forestall the possibility of a Gentile child bride rebelling against Judaism and spending the damages awarded to her as a heathen – an unthinkable blasphemy! But the rights of the little girl were really of no great consequence, for,
    “When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (three years and a day) it is as if one put the finger into the eye.”

    The footnote says that as:
    “tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.” (11)

    In most cases, the Talmud affirms the innocence of male and female victims of pedophilia. Defenders of the Talmud claim this proves the Talmud’s amazing moral advancement and benevolence toward children; they say it contrasts favorably with “primitive” societies where the child would have been stoned along with the adult perpetrator.

    Actually, the rabbis, from self-protection, were intent on proving the innocence of both parties involved in pedophilia: the child, but more importantly, the pedophile. They stripped a little boy of his right to “throw guilt” on his assailant and demanded complicity in sex from a little girl. By thus providing no significant moral or legal recourse for the child, the Talmud clearly reveals whose side it is on: the raping rabbi.

    Child rape was practiced in the highest circles of Judaism .
    This is illustrated from Yeb. 60b:

    “There was a certain town in the land of Israel the legitimacy of whose inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Romanos who conducted an inquiry and found in it the daughter of a proselyte who was under the age of three years and one day, and Rabbi declared her eligible to live with a priest.”

    The footnote says that she was “married to a priest” and the rabbi simply permitted her to live with her husband, thus upholding “halakah” as well as the dictum of Simeon ben Yohai, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest.” (12)

    These child brides were expected to submit willingly to sex. Yeb. 12b confirms that under eleven years and one day a little girl is not permitted to use a contraceptive but “must carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner.”

    In Sanhedrin 76b a blessing is given to the man who marries off his children before they reach the age of puberty, with a contrasting curse on anyone who waits longer. In fact, failure to have married off one’s daughter by the time she is 12-1/2, the Talmud says, is as bad as one who “returns a lost article to a Cuthean” (Gentile) – a deed for which “the Lord will not spare him.” (13) This passage says:

    “… it is meritorious to marry off one’s children whilst minors.”

    The mind reels at the damage to the untold numbers of girls who were sexually abused within Judaism during the heyday of pedophilia. Such child abuse, definitely practiced in the second century, continued, at least in Babylon, for another 900 years.

    Perusing the Talmud, one is overwhelmed with the recurrent preoccupation with sex, especially by the most eminent rabbis. Dozens of illustrations could be presented to illustrate the delight of the Pharisees to discuss sex and quibble over its minutest details.

    The rabbis endorsing child sex undoubtedly practiced what they preached. Yet to this hour, their words are revered. Simeon ben Yohai is honored by Orthodox Jews as one of the very greatest sages and spiritual lights the world has ever known [!!!]. A member of the earliest “Tannaim,” rabbis most influential in creating the Talmud, he carries more authority to observant Jews than Moses.

    1 Yebamoth 60b, p. 402.
    2 Yebamoth 60b, p. 403.
    3 Sanhedrin 76a.
    4 In Yebamoth 60b, p. 404, Rabbi Zera disagrees that sex with girls under three years and one day should be endorsed as halakah.

    5 Sanhedrin 69b.
    6 Sanhedrin 55a.
    7 Footnote 1 to Kethuboth 11b.
    8 Sanhedrin 55b.

    9 Sanhedrin 55a.
    10 Kethuboth 11a.
    11 Kethuboth 11b.
    12 Yebamoth 60b.
    13 Sanhedrin 76b.

  8. Thank you for your insightful comment at the beginning about the misnomer of “elite” when referring to these scum. These psychopaths are the sewage of humanity and far from “elites”.

    The use of language is critical, and it angers me to no end when I hear “alternative” sources of news regularly referring to the judeo-masonic predator class as “the elite”.

    It is factually incorrect, for one. These sickos are no more talented or gifted than the overall population. Yes, they are rich, but being rich does not equate to being “elite” in any way. I could be mentally retarded with zero talent, and have inherited my daddy’s billions. It does not follow that I am “elite”. They have a knack for lying, cheating, political machinations, causing mayhem and suffering, murder, etc … in short, for psychopathy, and again that does not make them “elite”. It makes them, as stated, humanity’s sewage.

Post a Comment

Winter Watch

Discover more from Winter Watch

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading