Raw Deal: Inside Story About the Sandy Hook Cases

I have learned a lot about the Sandy Hook court cases over the last week especially. This show gives listeners a unique opportunity to get the inside story as revealed by Bill Bonitati and Jim Fetzer. You will realize you didn’t know nothin’ before.

We also go into the Wyn Young oddity, Victor Vaca Hugo shitstorm and Bitchute’s failure to enforce rudimentary standards on cyber-bullying and defamation.  Some remedies (such that we can reveal) for this are broached.

Show is here.- starts in earnest at 15;00

13 Comments on Raw Deal: Inside Story About the Sandy Hook Cases

  1. Victor Hugo is out with his first counter-video. It is an embarrassing psychopathic rant. He is overwhelmed with grievances against all kinds of people. He slanders Revolution Radio early on calls them pedos. Half the video is some stream of consciousness about his herpes fixation with me.

    He sadistically growls a lot — high strangeness. Would you want to meet this guy in a dark alley? He puts up an old private e mail from Joaquim that is related to when Bill B was feuding with us.

    He says “It’s my job” to release personal emails, publicly embarrass people? Huh?! Will turn off the few who still follow him, barring a few psychos. Who would want to engage with Victor Hugo knowing that anything you say to him can and will be used against you.  

    See for yourself: https://www.bitchute.com/video/358N8R1NQ3L3

  2. Here are 13 pedo slander videos put out by Victor Hugo’s flying monkey Charlie Carter during one of his drinking binges. Bitchute is run by worthless algos and won’t remove. A criminal complaint will be filed, and injunctive relief is being prepared against Bitchute. Victor says he and Charlie are planning an ultimate folly show to highlight it all.
    https://www.bitchute.com/search?query=WinterWatch.org+Diddles+Children&kind=video&sensitivity_id=normal&duration=all&sort=new

  3. Looks like Bitchute or somebody (?) has blocked or taken down the recording as there is no video to play on Fetzer’s Bitchute channel. Is this to do with “legal issues”?

  4. It was inevitable that alternative media would be infiltrated by bad actors. Truth is not a feeling or an emotion that can be manipulated. Truth is a knowing that gets nurtured by more truth. Thanks for your voice in this clown world.

  5. Psychopath Victor Hugo’s latest behavior is to parse through his e mails looking for smack and more slander to levy. He says “It’s my job” to release personal emails, publicly embarrass people? Huh?! Will turn off the few who still follow him, barring a few psychos. Who would ever want to engage or share confidences with toxic Victor Hugo knowing that anything privately you say to him can and will be made public. Victor calls them “receipts”. https://www.bitchute.com/video/sqXqVBullXGX

  6. Victor Hugo’s latest: Jim Fetzer Russ Winter Joachim Jagopian Bill Bonitati Emails Destroy All Credibility Drip Drip Drip
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/Oosx8l18PxLz

    Huh? what is this? incoherent innuendo .

    Rule 106 is useful in defamation and slander cases: Federal Evidence Rule 106, also known as the “doctrine of completeness” or the “rule of completeness,” allows an adverse party to introduce other parts of a writing or recorded statement if the opposing party has introduced only part of it. This rule ensures that the jury views the evidence in its full context and prevents a misleading impression from being created by selectively presenting information.

  7. Latest Victor Hugo release with attorney Wyn Young.

    Young repeats his theory. Legal razzle razzle. Mostly on Alex Jones. Just not that convincing on the Fetzer-Halbig narrative. Accusations that we are committed to wide spread censorship as opposed to countering slander. Apparently Wyn Young hasn’t even bothered to view our Raw Deal show. Nor do they bother countering the arguments of that show.

    If you want main Fetzer related part they pontificate using short Rule 106 style clips (cherry picking) starting at 1:44:00, start listening there. All jumbled up, fuzzy thinking, contorted logic, and reaching. Designed to confuse the viewer.
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/100HCP6evZE1

    Rule 106 is useful in defamation and slander cases: Federal Evidence Rule 106, also known as the “doctrine of completeness” or the “rule of completeness,” allows an adverse party to introduce other parts of a writing or recorded statement if the opposing party has introduced only part of it. This rule ensures that the jury views the evidence in its full context and prevents a misleading impression from being created by selectively presenting information.

Post a Comment

Winter Watch

Discover more from Winter Watch

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading