House of COVID Cards Collapses: FDA Vaccine Panel Comes Out Against Deadly Injections

PHOTO: North County Daily Star

Bombshell testimony from top scientists at vaccine hearing reveals injections killing more people than saving and driving surge of variants.

By Jamie White | 19 September 2021

INFOWARS — Several doctors from the Food and Drug administration’s (FDA) vaccine hearing on Friday claimed in explosive testimony that the COVID-19 vaccine is killing more people than it’s saving and is driving the coronavirus mutations like the so-called ‘Delta’ variant.

FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee after 8 hours of testimony voted 16-2 against Joe Biden’s proposed COVID-19 booster shot program.

During that hearing, Dr. Steve Kirsch, director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, claimed that the injections are killing more people than they’re helping.

“I’m going to focus my remarks today on the elephant in the room that nobody likes to talk about: that the vaccines kill more people than they save,” Kirsch said via teleconference.

“Today, we focus almost exclusively on COVID death saves and vaccine efficacy because we were led to believe that vaccines were perfectly safe. But this is simply not true.” […]

2 Comments on House of COVID Cards Collapses: FDA Vaccine Panel Comes Out Against Deadly Injections

  1. More anti-vax lies. Here are the questions you need to Google before believing the above crap:

    Question 1.

    Is Steve Kirsch a doctor? (The article refers to him as “Dr Steve Kirsch”).

    Answer 1.

    No, the authors simply made up that lie to try to make him seem important. His own websites and Wikipedia confirm that he is not a doctor. He has two university degrees but medicine is not one of them:

    Question 2:

    Who is Steve Kirsch?

    Answer 2:

    He is a “serial entrepreneur” (Wikipedia) which means he comes up with ideas to make money for himself. He has come up with some good ideas in the past relating to computing and has made a lot of money. None of his ideas have been related to medicine.

    Question 3:

    Does Steve Kirsch have any education or training in vaccines or disease control or Covid-19?

    Answer 3:

    No, otherwise he would have listed them in his biography at or in his biography on his Covid-19 fundraising website

    Question 4:

    Is Steve Kirsch a “top scientist” or even a “scientist” as the article claims?

    Answer 4:

    No, another blatant lie to make him sound important. Not even Steve Kirsch himself claims to be a “scientist on any of his websites. He obtained a Bachelor of Science degree and a Master of Science degree in electrical engineering and computer science. Thousands of people around the world hold a Bachelor of Science degree. That does not make them “scientists”.

    Question 5:

    What is the “Covid-19 Early Treatment Fund”

    Answer 5:

    More crap to make Mr Kirsch sound important. The word “Fund” gives it away. It is a fundraising website set up by Steve Kirsch to raise money for research into using existing drugs to treat Covid-19 after you catch it, rather than trying to prevent you getting it in the first place. Steve Kirsch is not involved in any of the studies and none of the studies ( ) relate to vaccines, meaning Steve Kirsch is no more qualified to talk about Covid-19 vaccines than the office cleaner.

    Question 6:

    Is Steve Kirsch employed by the FDA, funded by the FDA, endorsed by the FDA or have any connection with the FDA?

    Answer 6:

    No, even though the article implies that he speaks for the FDA.

    Question 7:

    The heading on the article states: “FDA Vaccine Panel Comes Out Against Deadly Injections”. Is that true?

    Answer 7:

    No, another a blatant lie. The FDA panel and the FDA came out IN FAVOUR OF the vaccines. The true fact are outlined on the FDA website at

    On 11 Dec 2020 the FDA approved the use of 2 doses of the Pfizer vaccine for everyone over the age of 16, under an Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA).
    On 10 May 2021 the FDA expanded the EUA approval to include children from 12 – 16.
    On 23 August 2021 the FDA made the emergency use authorisation a permanent approval.
    On 25 August 2021 Pfizer asked the FDA to approve a third (booster) dose for all people over the age of 16 who had already had 2 doses of Pfizer vaccine, as is being done in Israel.
    On 17 September 2021 the FDA held open hearings on the subject. Any member of the public, with or without medical qualifications, was allowed to make submissions.
    One of the unqualified people who made a submission was Steve Kirsch. He simply trotted out the usual anti-vax propaganda and was ignored by the FDA, as shown by the fact that they did not adopt any of his recommendations. Steve Kirsch, a Mr nobody was the only one who “came out against the injections”.
    The false claims that Mr Kirsch made have been debunked in multiple places, including
    The FDA CAME OUT IN FAVOUR OF the third booster dose for people over 65 and for younger people with health conditions.
    The FDA decided not to approve the booster dose for people younger than 65 at this time ONLY BECAUSE THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE THAT 2 DOSES WAS NOT ENOUGH. At no stage did the FDA state that the rejection was due to any risk that the vaccine posed. On the contrary they had just permanently approved 2 doses for everyone over the age of 12.
    In summary, the FDA did not “Come out against deadly injections” as the article claimed. They permanently approved 2 doses of Pfizer vaccine for everyone over the age of 12. They stated in the press release and in numerous other places on their website that the vaccines are safe.
    Not even the most blindly fanatical anti-vaxer could interpret the above as meaning that the FDA “Came out against deadly injections” as the misinformation article claimed. They invent lies because there are no actual facts to support their opinions.

    • I initially put this comment in trash- but restored it as it illustrated in spades the use of fallacious arguments. Primarily you engage in appeal to authority and your own self defined notion of “experts”. Knocking “experts” off their pedestals is half of what this site does.

      See: Godfather of Vaccines Freely Admits to Unethical Skulduggery During Legal Deposition

      It was the FDA that invited a submission from Kirsch to get input from a variety of fields. Your statement, “any member of the public” is not factual- otherwise even I could have received a platform. The FDA vetted him before letting him make a statement.

      His input was primarily an examination of the statistics from the studies, not a medical diagnosis or treatment. That fact that the FDA ignored the statistics (and Kirsch) is their issue- not his.

      Personally I am increasingly leery of the “medical profession” and your sacred doctors and so called “science”. Too many who are given a platform are corrupt and captured behind belief. A non-medical background on occasion, as well as censored individuals, is a breath of fresh air.

      You said “Steve Kirsch is not involved in any of the studies”. Here you are using Orwellian doublethink to imply no one not directly involved in the studies can examine and speak to the outcomes. Really? That’s nonsense.

      You say, “Steve Kirsch is no more qualified to talk about Covid-19 vaccines than the office cleaner.” That may be your opine, but it is a classic example of fallacy of exaggeration and just blowing it out of your ass. In real life Kirsch, a MIT grad and highly successful software engineer invented the optical mouse, and the search engine Infoseek-purchased for a pretty price by Disney. That’s not the same level as the office cleaner- in the least.

      And speaking of non-medical types getting an unlimited platform to pontificate on jabs, we have none other than corrupto moneybag and Jeffrey Epstein pal, MISTER Bill Gates.

Post a Comment

Winter Watch