News Ticker

Race-Cult Zionism as a British Oligarchical Strategy

IMAGE: Statusofmind.com

In the year 1862, renegade socialist Moses Hess in Germany authored his book “Rome and Jerusalem” and became the first continental Jew of prominence to declare that “the hour had struck” for the return of “the Jewish race” to Palestine. At the time and for almost half a century afterward, Jews in Europe considered the idea very fringe.

Also in 1862, the future British King Edward VII, who was then the Prince of Wales, made a well-publicized tour of the Holy Land. But the prince’s trip had a broader significance: For the first time, the British crown openly adopted Zionism as its policy.

Edward was surrounded by an entourage of British Zionist propagandists gleaned from the dens of Oxford and Cambridge. His guide was Oxford church historian Dean Stanley, the author of “Sinai and Palestine” and “The History of the Jewish Church,” both of which  emphasized the “Jewish roots of Christianity.”

Leading up to the king’s tour, the Jerusalem Literary Society was set up in the 1850s by a circle congregated around the British Consul in Jerusalem, James Finn. In 1857, Finn had sent a dispatch to the British Foreign Office detailing a scheme “to persuade Jews in a large body to settle here as agriculturists on the soil.”

Benjamin Jowett was the fraudulent translator of Plato, who during the 1850s and ’60s used his post at Oxford to spread the idea that the Jewish prophets were the “schoolmasters of the ages” and those to whom “our age owed its moral feelings.”

Then there was Matthew Arnold, a Oxford Professor of Poetry, who lent his name to the doctrine that Christianity was only “modified Hebraism.”

Three years after Prince Edward’s trip to the Holy Land, the British Foreign Office began preparing Palestine for “resettlement.” In 1865, the Palestine Exploration Fund was founded with funding mainly from Oxford and Cambridge Universities and the Grand Lodge of Freemasons. Everywhere you looked, Zionism was a British and Freemason operation — with nary a Jew in sight.

As the scheme was rolled out, along came the influential Claude Conder (future Lord Kitchener’s) Old Testament Christian nutwingism typified by his work “Judas Maccabeus and the Jewish War of Independence” and “The Hebrew Tragedy.” Try giving this unreadable tract a shot, but be prepared to enter the “Twilight Zone.”

Lord Shaftesbury, one of the Fund’s founders, became its president in 1875. As he was preparing to die, Shaftesbury pleaded for the Fund “to send out the best agents” to “prepare” Palestine “for the return of its ancient possessors … for the time cannot be far off before that great event will come to pass.”

Once again, the mindset of these British elitists is alien and strange. There is zero consideration for the people already in place in Palestine. At that time, were there any particular indications that the Jewish people themselves were seriously consulted concerning this Messianic racist nutwingism? The answer is no. Shaftesbury wrote in the Quarterly Review:

Syria and Palestine will ere long become most important. The old time will come back … the country wants capital and population. The Jew can give it both. And has not England a special interest in promoting such a restoration? … She must preserve Syria to herself. Does not policy then … exhort England to foster the nationality of the Jews and aid them, as opportunity may offer, to return as a leavening power to their old country? England is the great trading and maritime power of the world. To England, then, naturally belongs the role of favouring the settlement of the Jews in Palestine…. The nationality of the Jew exists, the spirit is there and has been for three thousand years, but the external form, the crowning bond of union, is still wanting. A nation must have a country. The old land, the old people.

There was a nationalist stirring among European Jews. A “Hebrew language” revival was beginning centered around the literary publication Dawn (Ha-Shahar)Based in Vienna, Dawn spawned Hebrew-language revivalist sects in eastern Europe.

Enter British Prime Minister Jewish by blood Benjamin Disraeli (1804-1881) and his sidekick Lord Salisbury. These men were obsessed with messianic Zionism. Once again, we see a predominately British elitist synthetic plan for other people, a common globalist theme during the Imperial period. These elitists refused to leave anybody alone to their own devices and natural evolution. The whole planet had to be guided by crackpotism, often of a biblical nature.

Jewish historian Barbara Tuchman wrote: “To omit Disraeli from a central place in the 19th century development of Zionism would be as absurd as to leave the ghost out of Hamlet.”

Disraeli secretly authored the 1877 Jewish State blueprint. He lent support to a scheme of a South African Jewish mystic, Lawrence Oliphant, for a large-scale Jewish settlement project in the Palestine territory. He created the development of a “charter of rights” for Jews in southeastern Europe, which gave the British Foreign Office free rein to intervene at will in the affairs of principalities in that region.

The race-cult ideas of Disraeli and the Anglican “Jewish restorationists” of 19th century England laid the groundwork for modern Zionism. It’s not entirely clear when Disraeli teamed up with the Rothschilds, but the financing of the Suez Canal in 1875 led to “conversations” — and many would say schemes — pertaining to Zionism.

Was Zionism an Organic Judaic Movement? No.

The man who is officially known as the “spiritual father of Zionism and Israel was Theodore Herzl (1860-1904). Herzl was a twinkle in his daddy’s eye when Zionism was kick started. In fact, up to as late as 1895, Herzl was “fanatically devoted to the propagation of Jewish-German “liberal assimilationist doctrine.”

Then, (drum roll, please) Herzl was paid a visit on March 10, 1896, by British agent Rev. William Hechler, the Anglican minister to the British Embassy in Vienna. Somehow Hechler was able to “convert” Herzl to hardcore Zionism and make him the agent of it. Herzl wrote in his diary:

“Next we came to the heart of the business. I said to him: (Theodor Herzl to Rev. William Hechler) I must put myself into direct and publicly known relations with a responsible or non responsible ruler – that is, with a minister of state or a prince. Then the Jews will believe in me and follow me.”

This operation took place in two stages: first, a powwow was set up with Christian-messianic bible-thumping nutwing Frederick Wilhelm Ludwig (1826-1907), the Grand Duke of Baden. Then, the backing of the German State was secured when Herzl met Kaiser Wilhelm II in Palestine in 1898.

Only after these maneuvers and lobbying did the actual Jewish elites in Great Britain get on board with Zionism. The Order of Ancient Maccabeans (also Maccabaeans) is an AngloJewish society that was put in gear at this time.

However, early plans did not involve Palestine, as the Sultan rebuffed the Zionist overture. Herzl up to his death in 1904 pursued other lands as solutions. It wasn’t until 1905 (after Herzl’s death) that the 6th Zionist Congress, after investigations, decided to firmly commit itself to a Jewish homeland in Palestine. At that point, the Jews of Europe and elsewhere got the word. By and large, they were dragged into the scheme via machinations and only over time. The rest is history.

6 Comments on Race-Cult Zionism as a British Oligarchical Strategy

  1. Leading alt-media figure, Jewish Ron Unz, wrote a widely-read article on how shocked he was to learn the true nature of historical Judaism from the books of Israeli dissident Israel Shahak (1933-2001), Hebrew University chemistry prof who became an anti-Zionist activist (previously cited on TNN by Thomas Müller) … Some of the shocking – surprising elements, mostly from Jewish History, Jewish Religion: Weight of 3000 Years by Israel Shahak (free online book):

    Religion of most traditional Jews is not monotheistic, but contains a variety of male & female gods … religious Jews apparently pray to Satan almost as readily as to God … ritual itself is absolutely uppermost, while interpretation is secondary … many traditional rituals explicitly intend to fool or trick God or His angels

    The primary reason for the existence of non-Jews is to serve as slaves of Jews … In 2010, Israel’s top Sephardic rabbi declared that the only reason for the existence of non-Jews is to serve Jews & do work for them … Jewish religious traditions regarded slavery as the natural & appropriate lot of all non-Jews, Jews some of the leading slave-traders historically

    Jewish lives have infinite value, non-Jewish ones none at all … if a Jew needed a liver, it would be obligatory to kill an innocent Gentile & take his … today Israel is widely regarded as one of the world centers of organ-trafficking

    According to the Jewish Talmud, Jesus is perhaps the vilest being who ever lived, condemned to spend eternity in Hell, immersed in boiling excrement … many deeply religious Jews utter a prayer each day for the immediate extermination of all Christians

    Traditional penalty for any Jew who informs authorities on any matter regarding Jews has always been death, often preceded by hideous torture. [‘Law of the informer’ (din Moser) – A Jew who reveals Jewish secrets is a ‘Moser’ & the law imposes death on Jews who betray fellow Jews to judgement of Gentiles. ‘Law of the pursuer’ (din Rodef) commands every Jew to kill or wound severely any Jew perceived as intending to kill another Jew.]

    Political rulers with little sympathy for subjects sometimes restrict power to a small group of well-rewarded mercenaries [i.e., leading Jews ‘kosher nostra’] … E.g., traditional economic niches of European Jews from tax-farming, with Jews more likely to extract every last penny, their antipathy for all non-Jews ensuring minimal tempering by human sympathy

    All powerful mass-media technologies of our modern world, film, radio, & television, invented & pioneered by Gentiles, but in each case control was seized by ruthless Jewish businessmen … By the 1950s, nearly all of America’s leading concentrations of electronic media power were solidly in Jewish hands

    Unz also writes about Ariel Toaff, professor, Bar-Ilan University near Tel Aviv, son of the Chief Rabbi of Rome, who in 2007 published ‘Blood Passovers’, suggesting that the ‘blood libel’ of Jews killing Christians, including perhaps children, to steal their blood for Talmudic rituals, was true … Israel Shamir has put this online
    Blood Passovers – evidence behind the ‘blood libel’, by Israeli Prof Ariel Toaff

  2. Another great article, Russ. I reckon you are probably the best historian currently writing.

    I would only add that after Edward VII became king, his entirely Jewish advisors- the infamous “Jewish Seven” sought out the Saud family, then a tribe of Jewish bandits located in the geographical center of the Arabian peninsula. The Saudi were armed by the British with modern Lee-Enfield rifles, the same weapons used by the British army. This new-found firepower allowed the Saudi to capture the mud-walled village of Riyadh, and with consistent Zionist support they were later able to expand their power to nearly the whole of Arabia.

  3. Was asked a legit question that deserves an answer: How did the Race Cult Zionism benefit the British oligarchy?

    I can cite a few key ones and there are certainly more-

    -. A belief system: Keep in mind that these Anglicans were Old Testament fanatical types much like modern day evangelical Zionists. They devoured the OT way too much and ascribed way too much importance to it- including the concept of Israel.

    – The cause of Zionism wedded and allied them to Jewish finance- not an insignficant benefit then or now.

    -balkanization of Ottoman Empire, Palestine was part of that country until 1919

    • up until ww1 the rotchilds kept the ottoman empire afloat on purpose (since it was economically bankrupt since 1815….) as buffer against the tsar (the only non jewish run country), they took it down when it suited them

Post a Comment

%d bloggers like this: