The Media is in Full Lugenpresse Mode — and Yet the People Still Don’t Believe Them

Not only is the Lugenpresse media in the U.K. fully supporting a false-flag staged-deception lie on Syria but are engaged in a sick witch hunt of those who question the lie. In the following highlighted story, you can see blatant neuro-linguistic programming at work.

The Lugenpresse has invented a term called “Assad apologists” to apply to their dissenting targets. For dumb dumbs, this is a thought-terminating cliche. It’s just a way to shame people into never thinking about the big picture. Note that the headline says the dissidents are apologists, but the oxymoronic subheadline states they think Assad didn’t do it. [see: Chemical Attack at Douma, Syria Was a Poorly Done Fake]. How much more inverted, nasty and untruthful can it get?

Incredibly, polls indicate that only 25% of Brits supported the revenge air attacks on Syria. So apparently, the Lugenpresse has the chutzpah to push this narrative against 75% of the British people? Given the public distrust, is the alleged circulation of these facade rags even real, or do they get most of their income from oligarchs and the shadow government? See: [CNN’s Ratings Collapse As Primetime Shows Draw Less Viewers Than Re-Runs Of ‘Yogi Bear’]

The powers that be in the U.K. are in a dangerous quandary. Their corrupt government has taken steps toward Cheka authoritarian control, and it’s now a police state armed with its own weaponized media that will censor dissenting opinion.

Additionally, since people aren’t convinced by the deceptions and lies, the temptation is amplified to double down and run more deceptions or actual false flags. All this fuss, lying and disinformation surely isn’t just for one attack to some buildings, is it?

Notably, despite the fact that false flags are well documented as a psyop agit-prop tool for Shadow Government/Crime Syndicate social engineering, the Lugenpresse have never reported even one.

Despite the public opinion, the usual suspects who run inverted news coined the term “fake news” and are using its citizen’s taxes to run interference against it. The gubnut declared, “We are living in an era of fake news and competing narratives. The government will respond with more and better use of national security communications to tackle these interconnected, complex challenges.”

So now that dissenting views and “competing narratives” are a national security issue, how does that translate in the actual world? The answer is creepy and Orwellian for sure. In a whole series of phony ploys, the alternative media is under attack in Europe for “hate speech” and (potentially) terrorism. In the U.S., the alternative media is being accused of presenting Russian propaganda. British intel has lumped all of the above into a grab bag of sorts.

A Serious Credibility Problem

The public has a different view of what constitutes “fake news.” In the U.S., a new Monmouth University poll showed that 77 percent believe traditional media outlets report fake stories. Only 21 percent believe mainstream media news isn’t “fake.” Fifty-eight percent said stories are deliberately pushed by news outlets to advance an agenda.

According to communications agency Edelman’s 2017 Trust Barometer survey of 1,500 Britons, the number of people who said they trusted British news outlets at all fell from an already-low 36% in 2015 to a mere 24% in 2017.

This sentiment is held by a majority of voters across the ideological spectrum. In fact, the neocons are barking up the wrong tree with their inverted news narratives and spending public resources for Orwellian suppression. The people are not being fooled. They just need to vocalize it more directly at the actual culprits involved.

We see other Hegalian dialetic agents like Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson rail on the “left” as being behind neoconism. You see it on social media as bots blather on about “leftists.” That, too, is a false narrative. Yet the snake Trump has run interference and support for neocons from the get go.

Neocons are Trotskyites and Frankists, and so are neoliberals — and there aren’t that many of them. And, as the polls cited here show, they aren’t even that effective with brainwashing the populace any more. They resort to sneakiness, snarkiness, intimidation and increasingly, the power of the state to control.

There are plenty of progressives like Cynthia McKinney and Tulsi Gabbard, who are fighting this Trotskyite menace. If American and British young men come back in coffins in conflicts with Russians and Iranians, it will be the flower of all those countries and races destroyed. And for whom? Trotskyite neocon death-cult Thugs?

The new hate speech should be hating and naming neocons, such as the aforementioned The Times. Perhaps a comprehensive “list” needs to be created of all active neocons both within the government and out, just as they have done with their list of “fake news” websites and the “apologist” nonsense. Neocon lists clearly and transparently serve their own needs and attempt to quash their enemies and exposers. Reveal their dirty work of turning on their enemies and detractors with character assassinations. Reveal them instead. Bastante, we intend to name names!