‘It’s easier to fool people than to convince them they’ve been fooled.’ — Mark Twain
As with Benghazi, Deep State criminals appear to have a special challenge with Navy Seals. The reason for this is that Navy Seals are used for covert missions, some of which are bogus, like the killing of Osama bin Laden. Unlike their so-called kompromated “leadership,” at least some these soldiers are not full mode autotrons.
Read “Ex-Wife of Highly Ranked Colonel Unveils the Deep State and Crime Syndicate: The Kay Griggs Interviews”
I don’t run in their circles, but perhaps some of my regulars here can weigh in on that aspect. Regardless, it appeared that some were confident enough to talk more openly about aspects that weren’t right about the bin Laden mission.
I believe the Seal team members involved in the bin Laden operation represented a threat to the Crime Syndicate in terms of the possibility that several of them might expose the truth about that mission. Dead men can’t talk. In fact, the following “60 Minutes” interview is with the Navy Seal who is said to have shot “bin Laden.” The soldier said flat out the man he shot didn’t look like Osama. This seal, named Matt Bissonnette, wrote a book about his experience called “No Easy Day” (removed from Amazon). He wrote it under the pen name “Mark Owen.”
The 15 members of DEVGRU’s Gold Squadron, the special unit tasked with killing bin Laden on May 2, 2011, were among the 38 casualties (30 Americans) on Aug. 6, 2011, in the Maidan Wardak province of Afghanistan.
Unfortunately for the Crime Syndicate, the parents and families of these men are not actors, such as those used at the staged deceptions. When these families talk about their lost loved one, instead of spewing scripted-sounding, happy talk and psycho babble about heaven, charity scams, Christmas, God and country, you see real people in real pain asking real questions. They have become dedicated critics of the mission that cost the lives of their sons.
In the following video, the father of one of these fallen seals is being gaslighted, rushed and hardly permitted to speak to dinosaur, corporate, faux-media giant Fox News. For an understanding of gaslighting methodology, see “Gaslighting: The Case of Benghazi.”
The Washington Post also gaslighted him but allowed him to make the following statement:
“Somebody was leaking to the Taliban,” said Mr. Strange. “They knew. Somebody tipped them off. There were guys in a tower. Guys on the bush line. They were sitting there, waiting. And they sent our guys right into the middle.”
By all accounts, this mission was, at minimum, criminally negligent and incompetent. However, as is often the case with New Underworld Order crime, that is the cop-out version of events. In actuality, there was intent. This was an assassination. The smoking gun that points to it follows:
- The unit utilized an antiquated Vietnam CH47D Chinook helicopter last retrofitted in 1985. That was unprecedented. Seals exclusively use the state-of-the-art MH-47.
This was a high-risk mission flown into a hot zone at night.
No drones were used to take out, soften or prepare the target area. There was no escort and no recon Pathfinder utilized.
It was later shown that intel knew 100 Taliban fighters were in the vicinity. Indications are that they knew a CH47D was coming.
At the last minute, most of the Afghan commandos and all their officers were pulled from the chopper. They were replaced with eight unknown Afghans not listed on the manifest. Some suggest this was a Taliban suicide mission.
Although there was a firefight after the Chinook was shot down, all the Seals involved were immediately cremated — without consulting their families. Since there were no escorts or recon, it took 10 minutes for a rescue team to arrive, which gave sufficient time for the crash survivors to be massacred on the ground.
As is typical with Deep State crime involving aircraft, such as 9/11, no black box was ever recovered. The preposterous explanation given: It was “washed away in a flash flood.”
There was a cover up of the facts until a Congressional investigation was conducted.
The key points are laid out in the following video of parents speaking at the National Press Club. In interviews, it seems their consensus is that their sons were set up to be assassinated in retaliation for the hit on bin Laden. Others felt that their identities were exposed for retribution due to a cheap and tawdry politically motivated comment from Vice President Joe Biden [see “Who Betrayed Navy Seal Team 6?“].
There might be something to that, but this and other theories don’t really explain why they were sent on a suicide mission in the first place. Therefore, I think it was a dead-men-don’t-talk cover up as someone else was hit on the May 2, 2011 operation, and it wasn’t bin Laden.
When Libya was put into the hands of the rebels, there was still a large stash of high-tech weapons on the ground. Many, if not most, of these weapons fell into rebel hands.
The Crime Syndicate sensed a good business opportunity and started the process of purchasing these weapons for the purpose of shipping them off to jihadists and al-Qaeda in Syria. The transit point of this operation was the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. This was confirmed in a series of leaks thereafter.
The smoking gun of the embassy attack was the Obama administration’s ludicrous claim that there was a spontaneous protest over a religious slight in an Internet video.
As a rule of thumb, demonstrations occur in daylight so as to capture press coverage.
According to a Libyan-American witness, “There was no demonstration. They came with machine guns, with rockets.”
But in a country like the U.S., with a severely gaslighted population, those who don’t see rocket attacks and firefights that last all night as demonstrations are dismissed as crazy conspiracy nuts.
The most plausible conspiracy practice here was that the Libyan rebels pulled a double cross, pulled their security and took these weapons back. The Deep State operatives either failed to respond or failed to recognize the double cross — either that, or they were deliberately allowing their new al-Qaeda buddies to take the weapons back in an extra payment benefit deal. The Libyan jihadists then shipped the goods off to Syria and kept the money. I lean toward the second theory.
When the attack began, security at the compound was ordered to stand down. The problem was that several of the Navy Seals on site went with their trained instincts and defended the ambassador.
The ambassador himself was probably not tipped off as to the true nature of this sleazy Deep State operation and thought the situation was fight or die.
Another possible theory is that the ambassador was soft or resistant about the true intent of this weapons transfer and thus dispatched.
The firefight ranged on for 12 hours and the defending Americans were left to die as the stand-down extended to all military personal in the region that could have performed an interdiction and rescue. These are basically criminal Deep State operations that make little sense from a policy point of view unless seen in this light.
Recommended book: “Dark Forces: The Truth About What Happened in Benghazi” by Kenneth R. Timmerman