News Ticker

‘The Patrick ‘Dino’ Ryan Show’: Dino, Russ Winter Discuss a Slew of Topics

The duo ran the gamut in this one, dispensing with a number of hidden topics. It’s a good wake-up conversation for normies and pajama people to shake their world view.

The arrest of an uninjured individual resembling Tamerlan Tsarnaev during 2013 Boston pyrotechnic “bombing” is discussed. Film is blurred, but you can decide if there’s a strong resemblance in the face or if it’s just another coinkydink. Suspect in film is well built, as was Tamerlan. Debunkers claim there doesn’t appear to be visible body hair in this lighting as in the morgue and boxer pose. However, he does look athletic. Not too many men built like this boxer.

Lugenpresse Slate magazine’s explanation of what transpired here:

At one point, an unknown person of interest stripped naked—presumably at the request of police to ensure he was not carrying some type of explosives—and was captured on camera by CNN walking in police custody. It is unclear what, if any, connection that man had to the unfolding manhunt. CNN reports that he has since been released, although police have not yet commented about the man on the record.

Second notable is the leaked image of Tamerlan’s severely injured body at morgue.

Third is a brown-haired “Tamerlan” prone and dead on the ground. Tamerlan had black hair. No face damage as shown in morgue picture.

Forth is a clearer image of a brown-haired person the ground. Correction to my show comment: Tamerlan was allegedly steamrolled by a vehicle – not shot.

For further reading:

Next up, “Can the Government Hack Into Your Car?” Good question.


The May 4 One-Hour Segment of “Winter Watch on the Radio” is Here

The Full “Patrick Ryan Show” with Dino is Available Here


  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  • 56
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

11 Comments on ‘The Patrick ‘Dino’ Ryan Show’: Dino, Russ Winter Discuss a Slew of Topics

  1. Reports: Chauvin Juror Lied on Jury Questionnaire, Said He Never Attended Pro-Floyd RallyA juror in the trial of former cop Derek Chauvin not only misled the court about his knowledge of the death of George Floyd but also lied on the questionnaire jurors must answer before trial. … The truth about Brandon Mitchell surfaced in the last few days when a photo of the juror in a pro-Floyd T-shirt surfaced online. The photo was taken at a rally for Floyd in Washington, D.C., that Mitchell falsely said he did not attend, multiple news reports have disclosed.

    Telegram/Mike PeinovichChauvin trial juror Brandon Mitchell photographed himself at a BLM rally wearing a shirt that says “Get your knee off our necks” despite swearing on a court form that he had never attended such an event. This is just one of dozens of things wrong with this trial and this verdict. Mitchell is a perjurer and in a sane system he would be charged with contempt and the trial would be thrown out. Nevertheless “legal experts” claim that the chance for a successful appeal are slim. If the appeal is denied, and it likely will be, it is just further evidence of how corrupt and anti-White the system is.

    I assume the “legal experts” appear in a linked NYT article.

    I don’t expect Mitchell to face charges; investigations into Ferguson made it crystal clear that many witnesses lied under oath before a grand jury about what happened (‘Hands up don’t shoot’), but after exonerating Darren Wilson authorities also announced none of them would be charged with perjury.

    But with failure to sequester (or change venue) and now this I don’t see how an appeal can be denied — we’ll see…

    • … further evidence of how corrupt and anti-White the system is.

      White Farmers Excluded From Biden Loan Forgiveness Program Sue To Stop “use of race discrimination as a tool to end ‘systemic racism’”“Plaintiffs are farmers from Wisconsin, Minnesota, South Dakota, and Ohio who have direct loans with the Farm Service Agency (FSA) or loans backed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). They are otherwise eligible for the loan-forgiveness program in ARPA, except for the color of their skin. As white farmers, Plaintiffs are ineligible for this government benefit.”

      Recall SCOTUS already OK’d racial discrimination in university/professional school admissions (Grutter v. Bollinger), saying the state had a “compelling interest” in achieving ‘diversity’.

    • Executive Order Canceling the Constitution

      Preident Biden signed an Executive Order on Blocking Property with Respect to Specified Harmful Foreign Activities of the Government of the Russian Federation. Contrary to its title, this EO is not about Russia. It is designed to allow the Biden administration to deprive American citizens and organizations of their rights and property by arbitrarily linking those persons to real, imagined, or vaguely defined activities of the Russian government. … The Biden administration unilaterally makes the determination and requires neither criminal acts nor intent. The punishment is blocking assets and a prohibition on any dealing with the accused person. Spouses and adult children of individuals found guilty by accusation under this EO are punished, too. … Section 1 of the EO enumerates prohibited activities and defines guilty persons as those “determined” by the Secretary of Treasury and/or Secretary of State in consultation with the Attorney General to be:

      Currently in the Biden admin, all three cabinet officers named — “Secretary of Treasury and/or Secretary of State in consultation with the Attorney General” — are all Jews.

    • … I don’t see how an appeal can be denied — we’ll see…

      linkSince the judge does not want his house burned down, he will deny the request, which will then be appealed. Maybe they find some relief on appeal, but that will take years. Meanwhile, the judge will give Chauvin the max because that’s what the baying hyenas want.

      (A request for a new trial.)

  2. The naked dude is unquestionablyTamerlane Tsarnaev. How do we know? Firstly, the FBI says different, and they always lie. The FBI stated that the guy in question was an unnamed Chinese national. Not one Chinese in a thousand is built like that, so the likelihood of this being true is less than one chance in a thousand.
    The brown haired on the ground is not dead, but merely resting. Dead people are much more relaxed- that guy has muscular control that dead people lack.

    So it’s all lies, all the time- we expect nothing less from our government.

  3. Third is a brown haired “Tamerlan” prone and dead on the ground.

    What is your source for this foto? — as well as the info/claim it shows Tamerlan Tsarnaev — ?

    I found the same foto on a few other websites, but not really a clear statement that it showed Tamerlan Tsarnaev — ? — it clearly isn’t him of course; as you say the hair is brown (and no, that’s not due to the light), and even though you do not see the full face, it does not look like Tamerlan (or Dzhokhar) — and he’s clearly not dead; in wider versions of this same foto, he is raising his fingers off the ground — let’s assume it is Tamerlan; since he seems to be surrendering, and is under full control, how did he get the horrific injuries shown in the alleged morgue foto?

    I found one website saying the person on the ground was ‘thought to be Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’, but that cannot be true either — there are other fotos of his capture, i.e. of him emerging from the boat, and he is already bloody: there is blood all over the left side of this face — you clearly see the left side of this guy’s face, and there is no blood — are we supposed to believe they cleaned him up before telling him to lie on the ground?

    Boston Bomber Photos: 20 Pics of Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev

    These two alleged terrorists will not soon be forgotten, but what is truly unforgettable is how American and normal the Tsarnaev brothers were. Wrestling, boxing, hanging out with friends, making fun of different accents — the most shocking thing about them is how impossible it is to see a cold-blooded killer in either of their eyes.

    Yeah, we know — no motive, and just “normal” guys — weird, right?

  4. BLACK ON BLACK MURDER
    The national tally of black males 14 and older murdered in America from 1976 through 2005, according to U.S. Bureau of Justice statistics: 214,661. The numbers tell only part of the story of this largely urban war, where the victims bear an uncanny resemblance to their killers. A war of brother against brother, filled with wanton and automatic gunfire, even in the light of day, on neighborhood streets, where little boys make mud pies, schoolgirls jump rope, where the innocent are caught in the crossfire, where the spirit of murder blows like the wind. It is, so far, a ceaseless war in which guns are often the weapon of choice, and the finger on the trigger of the gun pointed at a black male is most often another black male’s.

    In 2005, — blacks — accounted for 13% of the U.S. population but 49% of all homicides. The numbers are staggering, the loss incomprehensible. Add to the tally of black males 14 and older slain across the country from 1976 to 2005, another 29,335 (slain from 2006 to 2010), and their national body count rises to 243,996, representing 82% of all black homicides for that 35-year period. What also becomes clear is this: We too often have raised killers. Add to that number 51,892 black females ages 14 and older, plus five whose gender was not identifiable, and the total, not counting children, is 295,893 — more than the combined U.S. losses of World War I, the Vietnam, Korean and Mexican-American wars, the War of 1812 and the American Revolutionary War.

    Two hundred ninety-five thousand eight hundred ninety-three.
    As far as I can see, that’s at least 295,893 reasons to cry. And it is cause enough for reticent churches, for communities, for lackadaisical leaders, for all people — no matter our race, color or creed — to find the collective will and the moral resolve to stamp out this human rights atrocity occurring right under our noses. Just imagine the human carnage and the toll to us all if we don’t.

    THE “INSTITUTIONAL RACISM” CANARD
    It bears no resemblance to reality — not in police forces, and not in America.
    About twice as many white people as black people are killed by police. In fact, in about 75 percent of police shootings, the decedent is not black. Of course, that is not what you would grasp from consuming media.

    Take the website statista.com, specifically its breathless focus on “Hate crime in the United States” — counterfactually insinuating that any shooting involving a black victim must be a “hate crime.” Here’s their big headline from Tuesday:

    “Black Americans 2.5X More Likely Than Whites to Be Killed By Police.”

    It is fiction. It is sheer demagoguery, peddled as American cities are besieged by rioters in the wake of George Floyd’s killing by Minneapolis police. The falsity of the claim is demonstrated even by statista.com itself. Just three days ago, the site posted another series of bar graphs, showing that, in fact, whites are nearly twice as likely as blacks to be shot to death by police. Here are the numbers:

    Year- White- Black
    2017- 457- 223
    2018- 399- 209
    2019- 370- 235
    2020 (so far)- 42- 31

    The rest of the bar graphs break out the numbers of Hispanic decedents (slightly lower than black, significantly lower than white), as well as those whose heritage is described as “other” and unknown.

    Right underneath its chart, statista.com writes, “Sadly, the trend of fatal police shootings in the United States seems only to be increasing.” In point of fact, it is steady — and if I wanted to play games like statista.com does, by, say, weighting the numbers to account for population growth while ignoring all other relevant factors, I could even pretend that the number was decreasing. The Washington Post acknowledges that fatal shootings by police have run steadily at around 1,000 per year since 2015 — 995 (2015), 963 (2016), 987 (2017), 998 (2018), and 1,004 (2019).

    As Heather Mac Donald relates in an insightful Wall Street Journal op-ed, blacks make up only a quarter of the total number of people killed in police shootings annually, a ratio that has held steady since 2015. The reigning canard, however, is that this 25 percent figure proves racism since African Americans make up just 13 percent of the U.S. population.

    Ridiculous as this syllogism is (as we’ll see, it conveniently elides more consequential factors), it still puts the lie to the slanderous narrative that police are hunting down black men. Even if we ignore the fact that an increasing number of police officers — obviously including those involved in encounters with black suspects — are themselves African Americans, the percentage of black deaths from police shootings would be much higher if blacks were being targeted.

    Police do not go looking for people to shoot. In shooting situations, police are confronting crime suspects, the majority of whom are armed. But given that George Floyd was unarmed, let’s consider unarmed people killed in such encounters. Such unarmed decedents, too, were twice as likely to be white as black in 2019 — i.e., 19 unarmed whites, nine unarmed blacks. As Ms. Mac Donald observes, this ratio is not stable (and there is some looseness in what the media define as “unarmed”): In 2015, it was 38 unarmed blacks to 32 unarmed whites.

    The Floyd killing has been injected into the bien pensant narrative of innocent, unarmed black men murdered by cops. But the number of unarmed black men killed by police is vanishingly small. As Mac Donald notes, there were 7,407 black homicide victims in the United States in 2018, the last year for which final numbers are available. Assuming a comparable number in 2019, the nine unarmed men killed in police shootings would represent just 0.1 percent of black homicides.

    In stark contrast, she asserts, “a police officer is 18½ times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male is to be killed by a police officer.”

    The media, the bipartisan political class, the academy, and the commentariat concoct their “systemic,” “institutional,” “unconscious” racism fiction by statistical tunnel vision: We must conclude that African Americans — in particular, young black men — are being targeted by police because the percentage of killings of blacks significantly over-represents the black population. It makes no sense, however, to look only at the percentage of blacks involved in police shootings, as if it were the only attribute that mattered — as if it were the only attribute by which blacks are over-represented compared to their percentage of the overall population.

    While African Americans are involved in two times more police shootings than their percentage of the population would seem to warrant, they commit 53 percent of murders and 60 percent of robberies — well over four times their percentage of the population. The political establishment would have you assume this statistical disparity is caused by institutional racism that myopically beams police attention onto black men. But we know the statistics accurately reflect reality because crimes get reported by victims — a large percentage of whom are black (also outstripping their share of the overall population).

    If you just focus on interracial crime, though, Mac Donald (writing this time in the City Journal) has crunched those numbers. “Between 2012 and 2015, blacks committed 85.5 percent of all black-white interracial violent victimizations.” This, she qualifies, excludes interracial homicide. Powerline’s Paul Mirengoff fills in that blank: “Blacks commit around 70 percent of black-white interracial homicides.” For this, he draws on FBI crime statistics for 2016. They show that, of 776 black–white homicides, blacks committed 533 and whites 243.

  5. BLACK ON BLACK MURDER

    Don’t worry about it — that’s a feature, not a bug.

    In 2005, — blacks — accounted for 13% of the U.S. population but 49% of all homicides.

    This understates the problem because it’s black males between say 18 and 45 who commit the vast majority of these killings, and they are absolute max 4% of the population — also you have to remember that 30% of black males are convicted felons, so at any time a good portion of the black male population of prime murdering age is already behind bars — I recall looking into it once, and outside of the prime offending demographic, i.e. males 18 – 45, the murder rate for black female perpetrators was actually fairly comparable to the rate for white males.

    “Blacks commit around 70 percent of black-white interracial homicides.”

    It’s not just homicide — for all/any kinds of violent crime, the per capita rate of black on white violent crime is FAR greater than the rate of white on black violent crime — the extreme of this is rape: for all practical purposes, white on black rape does not occur (in some years 0 instances are reported in FBI/UCR data), while every year tens of thousands of white women are raped by black men.

  6. Travis,

    We lost a pretty good kid in Matthew North! It now seems that maybe his ‘constitution’ was a bit too sensitive! He put together some solid videos and could have really been a formidable force to reckon with had he chosen to stick it out! Such is life I guess!

Post a Comment

Winter Watch
%d bloggers like this: