Hasbro last week became yet another toy manufacturer that has slithered its way into the nightly fake news and national dialog by sacrificing its generations-old product on the alter of identity politics to appease new woke-Millennial parents and GLAAD-handed mobs.
The company is rebranding its 70-year-old Mr. Potato Head toy (for ages 2 and up) by dropping the word “Mr.” Henceforth, it will simply be known as Potato Head. Hasbro said gender-neutral rebranding is to ensure “all feel welcome in the Potato Head world,” NBC News reports.
Included with Hasbro’s “gender neutral” rebranding announcement was this image, which will be featured on the new Potato Head packaging.
Clearly, these Potatoes are not “genderless.” It’s a couple of creepy-looking homosexual spuds that appear ready to pounce on a genderless baby potato sprout. Gender neutrality represents the absence of gender.
Gosh, who do those spuds remind me of … Oh, I know!
Of course, homosexual advocacy groups, applauded Hasbro’s so-called “genderless” rebranding.
“Hasbro is helping kids to simply see toys as toys, which encourages them to be their authentic selves outside of the pressures of traditional gender norms,” Rich Ferraro, GLAAD’s chief communications officer, said in a ridiculous statement.
Ah, yes, the pressure on 2 year olds to conform is absolutely devastating.
“The name change will come with a fresh branding look with a whimsical color palette and more inclusive messaging along with new product to appeal to the modern consumer,” Hasbro said. Translation: Rainbows and virtue signaling. Lovely.
Ali Mierzejewski, editor in chief at toy review site The Toy Insider, correctly points out that although it’s just a potato, “kids like to see themselves in the toys they are playing with.” She says that while genderless toys are a growing trend that has already been happening, Mr. Potato Head is one of the biggest brands to do so.
“It’s setting a new standard,” she said.
Of course, Hasbro won’t be the last toy company to troll Twitter’s twats, and it certainly wasn’t the first. Countless faux “gender neutral” toys can be found in Satan’s toybox.
American Girl
For those unfamiliar with American Girl brand, it’s an expensive doll paired with a book. The book tells the story of the doll — or, more accurately, it’s a fictional story about a little girl who the doll represents. On a regular basis, the company publishes new books by guest authors and creates a new doll that represents the protagonist and sometimes additional key characters. It’s a great idea for a toy.
Traditionally, it has been a responsible brand welcomed by even strict conservative Christian families. However, it recently published a book called “Kira Down Under” that has moms and fans up a tad upset.
The storyline is about a 10-year-old blonde girl named Kira who goes to visit her lesbian aunts in Australia, where the same-sex couple owns a wildlife sanctuary. Her aunts were married “after the law was changed to allow it,” referring to Australia’s 2017 decision to legalize same-sex marriage.
Of course, what this is really about is social engineering. It’s about desensitizing little girls to homosexuality and indoctrinating them in liberal ideology.
Mattel
In 2019, Mattel, which is the company that makes Barbie, unveiled the “world’s first gender neutral doll.” Mattel touts it as “a doll for everyone.” The company’s media marketing materials feature an 8-year-old blond boy, who considers himself “gender fluid,” playing with the dolls along with a 7-year-old black girl with a shaved head and wearing a tutu.
Imagine a tiny mannequin that lacks any anatomical gender. It’s sold in a box with a wigs and an array of male and female clothing and accessories. Basically, it’s like a drag queen trainer toy. “Trixie Mattel” explains in the following video.
Mattel’s President Richard Dickson told TIME magazine the doll isn’t intended as a statement.
“We’re not in the business of politics,” he said, “and we respect the decision any parent makes around how they raise their kids. Our job is to stimulate imaginations. Our toys are ultimately canvases for cultural conversation, but it’s your conversation, not ours; your opinion, not ours.”
Yes, of course. It’s about money for Mattel. Wouldn’t expect anything less from a corporation, except at least a hint of feigned corporate responsibility as a toy manufacturer not to create products that could potentially harm children’s mental development.
It’s Not Just Toys
Of course, the toy department isn’t the only place where well-meaning, woke parents can nurture a confusexual child. There are also dystopian “designer fashion” clothing lines for genderless tykes and teens.
Singer Celine Dion is one of many who’ve jumped on gender-neutral fashion bandwagon. In 2018, she revealed that she had partnered with children’s clothing brand Nununu to create a gender-neutral clothing line called Célinununu, with sizes ranging from infancy to the age of 14.
“I’m convinced that the way this gender thing has spread is demonic,” Catholic Church Monsignor and exorcist John Esseff told Patti Armstrong, a mother of 10 children, in 2018. Armstrong contacted Esseff because she was concerned the about influence of gender-neutral and gender-fluid ideology on impressionable children.
The exorcist told her the “devil is going after children by confusing gender.”
He said, “People behind this are influencing children to disorder. This is definitely satanic. There is a mind behind it — an organized mindset. The devil is a liar and there are huge lies being told. This is being done for money, and there is divisiveness that comes from this — marks of the devil.”
Is There Real Harm?
From the age of 2, children begin to recognize and develop gender identity. From these early years through adolescence, environmental elements, such as toys, can have a profound influence children’s formation of identity.
Gender identity disorder in children (GIDC) is when there’s a mismatch between a child’s biological sex and their identity, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). In 2013, the DSM renamed GIDC as “gender dysphoria” to “remove the stigma associated with the term disorder.” Nonetheless, it is a mental disorder.
Gender dysphoric children often suffer from anxiety and depression, as well as a high risk of self-injury and suicide.
Yet, there’s clearly a concerted effort underway to deprive children of the sex-typed information needed for gender identity development. The end result will be increasing numbers of undifferentiated individuals — confusexuals — who will likely require a lifetime of psychological, pharmacological and medical treatment.
Various studies have documented the relationship between gender dysphoria in children and eventual homosexuality as adults. Much of the scholarship is reviewed in the book “Gay, Straight and the Reason Why: The Science of Sexual Orientation.” It summarized the findings of these studies in the following passage:
Looking at all of the prospective studies, it seems that marked gender-nonconformity in childhood, especially when the child expresses a persistent wish to be of the other sex, greatly increases the likelihood that a child will develop sexual attraction to his or her own sex in adulthood.
The predictive power of this association is greater for boys than girls: Perhaps 50%-80% of such boys develop sexual attraction to males, but only about on-third of girls develop sexual attraction to females.
A 2019 “LGBTQ Teens” study analyzed a national sample of 17,112 adolescents (ages 13 to 17 years) and found that 24 percent of those surveyed utilized nontraditional sexual orientation/gender identity, such as pansexual and nonbinary.
Torchy Takeaway
An aside: In skimming news articles about gender neutral toys for children, I found that most reporters drew parallels between boys playing dress up with gender-fluid dolls — or rather cross-dressing up — to girls dressing up their feminine dolls in occupational uniforms, such as Barbie as an airline pilot or astronaut, or STEM science toys that feature a girl on the package. Really? Does this strike anyone else as an incredibly bizarre and sexist?
One is occupational. The other involves sexual identity. One leads to a professional career. The other leads to gender dysphoria, depression and suicide. Comparable? I think not.
Toy manufacturers say they’re responding to the market, not driving it. I have to wonder. I think these old brands are under pressure to remain relevant among a new generation of parents who are driven by identity politics and the rejection of anything traditional. Children’s needs be damned.
Undoubtedly, marketing departments run by Millennials are advising aging white male CEOs that the holy grail for their company is to get their product trending on social media and mentioned in the nightly news. What we end up with as a society is a shock-and-awe race to the bottom.
So what’s the next big rage/outrage coming down the pike? Possibly a Barbie same-sex wedding set. After Matt Jacobi posted the following message on Instagram, Mattel contacted him for a product meeting, according to CNN.
All this could have been avoided if men had decided long ago that El and Eloha (see Job and plenty apocrypha) are together Elokhim, our parents in heaven, just like all the rest of the worlds creation stories have a mamma and a papa, and realise that obviously godhead comes down as Christ and His Holy Spirit, the feminine magnetic counterpart in heaven, whose name is Surrender in Him but noooooooo, these new Christians decided it was quite nice to have God be man only and so set they to worshiping their HyksosFakeJew gay trinity.
I told them before. Maybe they’ll listen now.
https://hamburg.mitvergnuegen.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/09/gdfgadf.gif
I’ll tell you whats evil: Giving little girls barbie dolls to instill in them an impossible ideal to live up to so that they can grow up to be self-hating, self-destructing women. Giving little boys G.I. Joe dolls to instill in them a desire for combat making them ripe for the plucking by any government wanting to recruit for a war to serve its own agenda (which is all war really is).
Who cares if I wear men’s briefs? Im a good person and I know how to love and thats all that matters.
Okay Twiggy. We all like to wear our bfs comfy briefs. And I have a trans client I adore, heart of a honeycomb. SHE got that way after suffering near fatal effects of a new TB medicine. Go figure. She’s designing a range of underwear she says boys and girls can both wear. I asked her to please please please make me a gorgeous string bikini with a proper bottom and she obliged. I can’t tell you how thrilled I am because it’s impossible to find this classic Risky Business look anywhere and for good or for bad (mostly bad I think), that 80s trash was my pubescent projection.
Which brings me to the dolls you mention. I totally absolutely agree Barbie has always been bad news. I think from the start the grey hairs at Mattel were confused when housewives broke out of the kitchen because their new appliances were being sold as doing their jobs for them. Girls dolls are magical beings and I can refer you to any European fairytale book to peruse and search for appropriate wishes for little girls. However, I strongly disagree that GI Joe is a bad role model for little boys. Boys absolutely need to be offered the rough and tumble element of their nature as a child in order to consciously metabolise there own violence as an adult. Little girls will never really know how difficult it’s is to be a boy. Of course, both little girls and little boys are individuals and it’s up to responsible parents to understand and cater for the nuances of their children, however we’re looking at a bell curve here okay. Your normal rank and file female and male archetypes can be gleeened from thousands of years of history okay. If there’s trouble later with say US veterans then that’s another story, and yes a terrible double bind for them and their country, a big topic but also quite simple if you consider them as fodder in Jewish wars. So my dear Twigsligs, let’s move forward together and give little girls all the magic they deserve in their future happiness, and allow little boys grow up to want to make their dreams come true. And if that means monstrous creatures neither male nor female threaten that happiness, why lets hope the boys do the kind thing, and very quickly. Because you do know what happens to little boys and girls who don’t know who they are, when they go out to play in the forest …
“Twigsligs”? What kind of sarcastic piece of work are you?
At least whiny goth nihilists had The Cure, you’ve just got some tighty whities.
Nope. Boxers.
THE WAY THINGS ARE GOING:
https://endtimeheadlines.org/2021/02/exorcist-recounts-evil-spirits-attacking-woman-and-then-throwing-him-down-stairs/
https://www.returntoorder.org/2021/02/is-dorothy-day-another-of-joe-bidens-heroes/?pkg=rtoe1256
https://humansarefree.com/2021/02/artificial-meat-company-claims-you-can-buy-salami-made-from-human-flesh-of-famous-hollywood-actors-insane-people-are-currently-in-charge-of-everything.html
We are screwed in America. With the left you get American style “Catholic-communism” and with the right you get the Noahide Law bunch.
https://brutalproof.net/2020/07/jewish-noahide-laws-passed-by-congress-are-for-beheading-of-christians/
I can hardly bear to think about this stuff (what a wimp!)
But I can offer this: My day job has long been databases (and human services) – and I have seen the transition from SEX: M/F to GENDER: M/F … and now of course, to expanding the allowed responses .. m-to-f, f-to-m and on and on.
Seems to me, programs funding AIDS/HIV services were first to expand – but not until 4 or 5 years ago – it is an extensive re-tooling project up and down the line – and going from binary to non-binary storage (ha ha) adds complexity (and 7 more bits) …. backwards compatibility can be tricky.
In that context, I am aware of a new US Dept of Justice program supporting Domestic Violence prevention and mitigation services. So, web sites were built, templates created etc etc…. I imagine the moving spirits were a group of largely young female attorneys – bright, committed, passionate about the issue; leftist in some sense, of course. And there it is! – GENDER: Male/Female/unknown – period.
My take-away? The whole trans thing is not (quite) yet a juggernaut; it is creating fissures among groups allied on just about everything else; my sense is that one fissure is between the gay and lesbian communities; the latter now sensing some real threat. I have read that there is just a single “lesbian bar” remaining in the US – all the rest of the 200 or so, are re-orienting to attract female-to-male transsexuals, a group which threatens to introduce perverse sexual and dominance dynamics into the lesbian communities; communities purpose-built, so to say, to eliminate, or at least flee from such.
Things are fluid, as I like to say.
Solid insight, those TERF’s and AWFL’s are hilariously ironic people. Wonder how much longer they’re willing to double down on “diversity is our greatest strength” rhetoric?
Your workplace description reminds me of the Voight-Kampff Test scene from the new Blade Runner.
https://youtu.be/vrP-_T-h9YM
Cultivating mental illness in young boys?
The study/promotion of this crap in America was started in sincerity very quickly following WWII(supposedly rolled out in 1953 and ending in the late 60’s)via MKULTRA and it’s sub programs such as Butterfly and Bluebird. It was never about promoting freedom and advancing the human condition, it was always about ways to seek total control over anyone “they” would consider a threat to their evil schemes(foreign or domestic).
We are now living in a world that was formed from the lessons learned by the delusional psychopaths of those early days. They no longer find it necessary to hide the brick wall at the back of the theater, as Frank Zappa warned us would eventually happen: “The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it’s profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater.”
More on how it all started: https://fightingmonarch.com/2019/09/24/the-scream-of-the-butterfly-jim-morrison-project-monarch/
“Toy manufacturers say they’re responding to the market, not driving it.” I call bullshit. Gays are <10% of the market, trans and others in the LGBT soup, exponentially less than that. Watch their stocks tumble when very few of these stupid toys get sold. These products will be discontinued after disappointing sales figures. Vintage Mr. Potato Head sets will fetch 10x their retail price on ebay. Then the stupid experiment will end. Just another example of why the real voting is done with the wallet.
What must the communist Chinese think as their workers earn big bucks for their antIChrist slave masters by manufacturing these idols of perversion for ‘amerikan’ kids? Are we not over ripe enough to fall into the hands of the enemy?
I just wanted to be a dinosaur, and drive a Range Rover and make bank bro.
https://youtu.be/zs8dRgvPAms
These things are lunatics, absolute lunatics.
When the degeneracy gets to be to much, Eivør’s voice clears my head, replenishes my spirit. Please enjoy, FWIW.
Nice!
Where all this leads:
https://twitter.com/LabelFreeBrands/status/1366167980816494592
[“Sex life gone bad after SRS”
A woman asks for advice about difficulties with her trans partner following genital surgery.
She needs to pop a Xanax before sex, gags from the neovagina smell, and got hit with a bloody dilator when she cried.
And is SO apologetic about it all.]
Attached to this tweet are a couple of images/screen caps of the related post (request for advice); if you want to read them do so now, as this tweet will probably be deleted soon.
SRS = sex reassignment surgery — apparently this woman’s husband decided he was transsexual and underwent ‘bottom’ surgery — part of appreciating the horror here is trying to imagine what it must be like to perform a ‘dickectomy’ on a man, i.e. surgically remove his penis, and then attempt to surgically construct a ‘neovagina’ down there, including labia.
While you’re at it, try to imagine what kind of doctor/surgeon would mutilate another human being this way, and then ponder the future — I suggest reading ‘The Island of Dr Moreau’ by HG Wells.
I’ve seen a number of similar stories of a ‘neovagina’ turning into a foul smelling mess full of fetid discharge.
The “neovagina” is actually a wound -the body tries (and tries) to heal it – frequent intercourse and or use of a “dilator” interrupts the healing process (and keeps the wound open … hence “foul smelling mess”).
I imagine that leaves the immune system very confused and unhappy.
Paul McHugh MD – now aged 89 – shut down Johns Hopkins’ SRS program way back in the 1970s – they were the “pioneers” – something about surgeons going to work every day and destroying perfectly healthy and functioning human organs and tissue irked him (imagine that).
“We don’t treat anorexia by performing bariatric bypass surgery”
Point is, these are somatic symptom disorders. Treatment should not include modeling the disorder surgically.
“surgeons going to work every day and destroying perfectly healthy and functioning human organs and tissue”
The doctors and other healthcare workers who psychologically, chemically, and physically mutilate these people are also mentally ill.