News Ticker

The Casting Couch of Hollywood’s Jewish Phallocrats

A golden sculpture of Harvey Weinstein on his infamous casting couch holding an Oscar in Hollywood, California, displayed days before the 90th Academy Awards on March 4, 2018. PHOTO: AFP/Frederic J. Brown

‘I met them all. Some were vicious and crooked.’ — Marilyn Monroe (1926-1962)

Long before Harvey Weinstein sullied the reputations of “white men,” Hollywood Jews in positions of power coldly used women as sexual receptacles. They ruined the lives of countless girls and women who refused or fight back, and they emotionally damaged those who submitted out of fear or a moment of weakness. The cynical and ambitious ones formed a sick symbiotic relationship with their abusers.

Upton Sinclair once remarked, “Jewish traders sold Christian girls into concubinage and into prostitution, and even today they display the same activity in the same field in southern California where I live.”

F. Scott Fitzgerald summed up the Hollywood scene of his era: “A Jewish holiday, a Gentile tragedy” (Gabler, 2).

Image result for billy wilder pervert
Billy Wilder (center)

In the 1940s, the novelist Raymond Chandler was in Hollywood, and assigned to work with Jewish writer and director Billy Wilder. Chandler was appalled by the way the married man would constantly and openly “chat up” young starlets with whom he had innumerable sexual trysts, evidently regarding them as mere entertainment and simply his “due” for being a man of his position (or as one of the “chosen”).

Chandler said he was disgusted by Hollywood’s Jewish elite and later wrote to a friend: “Los Angeles has nothing for me anymore. It’s only a question of time until a Gentile has to wear an armband there.”

RELATED: “Who runs Hollywood? C’mon”

Image result for "arthur freed" shirley temple
Director Arthur Freed

When child star Shirley Temple was 11 years old, she was asked to come — alone — into the office of Jewish film producer Arthur Freed to “talk about her upcoming films.” Temple was already one of the most popular stars in Hollywood. She was hardly of an age to even understand the meaning of the term “casting couch,” nor did she particularly need Freed’s favor. But Freed simply couldn’t restrain himself.

According to Temple herself, Freed had only uttered a few sentences about her films when he suddenly exclaimed, “I have something made for just you,” while taking down his pants. As he exposed himself to her, he proclaimed, “You’ll be my new star!”

Image result for shirley temple age 11
Shirley Temple (1928-2010)

Temple was protected by her very real innocence of such things, and could only laugh. Her laughter enraged Freed to the point of forgetting all about his sick lust. Temple said that Freed yelled at her, ‘“Get out!” He then shouted, unmindful of his disarray, imperiously pointing to the closed door, “Go on, get out!”’ (Wall Street Journal)

Harry Cohn (1891 –1958) the founder of Columbia Pictures Corporation, was part of the Eastern European Jewish mogulocracy that came from nowhere. Cohn was a tyrant. His temper was his chosen tool for getting his way. Listening devices throughout his studio helped him eavesdrop on subordinates and a sound system allowed him to blast anyone who annoyed him.

Cohn filled his shelves with silk stockings and expensive perfumes. He helped entrench the system in the movie industry during four decades in film. From the start, Cohn used his aggression to exert control over female stars. Not only did he force them to change their names and their appearances, but he regularly forced them to trade sex for employment, then scrutinized and even spied on them. He relentlessly demanded that the actress Rita Hayworth in particular sleep with him, bugged her dressing rooms and imposed financial penalties for insubordination.

In the words of E.J. Fleming — whose book “The Fixers” focused on how Hollywood studios controlled their stars’ images — Cohn “was said to have verbally or physically raped every woman that ever worked for his studio.”

Harry Cohn with Rita Hayworth and Anita Louise, 1946. PHOTO: Columbia/Kobal/REX/Shutterstock

Early in Marilyn Monroe’s career as a struggling actress, the Jewish head of Columbia, Harry Cohn, invited her to an overnight cruise on his yacht. Monroe was required to strip naked for Cohn in his office. As she bent over, at his direction, he approached her, penis in hand. When she declined his advances, said Monroe, “I had never seen a man so angry” (Jordan, 91; Wolfe, 211-212). Cohn then “banned her from the [Columbia] lot after she refused to accompany him on a yacht to Catalina Island” (Leaming, 8).

“You know,” Monroe once said, “that when a producer calls an actress into his office to discuss a script that isn’t all he has in mind … I’ve slept with producers. I’d be a liar if I said I didn’t” (Summers, 34-35). In 1955, 20th Century Fox awarded Monroe the richest per-film contract of any actress. “It means,” remarked Monroe, “I’ll never have to suck another Jewish cock again!” (McDougal, 217).

“By 1953,” Ted Jordan reports, “Monroe could be virulently ‘anti-Semitic’ (a sentiment that grew as she got older). To my discomfort, she would sometimes refer to Joe Schenck, the mogul [and another sexual stepping stone], as ‘that Jew shit’ and to other Hollywood personalities as ‘Jew’ this or that. Occasionally I would have to remind her that I was half Jewish” (Jordan, 188).

Louis B. Mayer and child actress Judy Garland

Jewish phallocrat Louis B. Mayer (1885-1957), who co-founded Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) studios in 1924, was ground zero of this kind of abuse. He had the means, motive, opportunity and that critical piece of the puzzle: the whip. If women didn’t comply, he’d threaten to ruin their careers or those of their loved ones, according to Variety magazine.

Cari Beauchamp, author of “Without Lying Down: Francis Marion and the Powerful Women of Early Hollywood,” noted: “Mayer chased actress Jean Howard around the room. When she said, ‘No way,’ and went off and married Charles K. Feldman, the agent, Mayer banned Charlie from the lot. For a long time after, he wouldn’t allow any of Feldman’s clients to work at MGM.”

Mayer also allegedly groped the teenage Judy Garland, according to Gerald Clarke’s book “Get Happy: The Life of Judy Garland,” and held meetings with the young woman seated on his lap, his hands on her chest.

Claudette Colbert wrote that the only star she knew who had not made it via the casting couch was Bette Davis — and that included herself. Most biographies today describe Mayer as a man who “personally serviced” every actress he signed – hundreds of them.

It was claimed Sam Goldwyn (aka Samuel Goldfish) of MGM wasn’t really that in to it, but he engaged in these behaviors mostly to keep up with his fellow phallocrats..

Goldwyn: A Biography – A. Scott Berg

Jack Warner (aka Wonskolasor), the driving force and the youngest of the Bros — there were six in all — is universally described as a horrible man. Film critic and historian David Thomson, who wrote “Warner Bros: The Making of An American Movie Studio” for the Yale Press Jewish Lives series, stated that Warner was “maybe the biggest scumbag ever to get into a Jewish Lives series.”

Winter Watch Takeaway: And that’s saying something!

Watch you back and your ass around this guy.

Whenever studio chief Jack Warner arrived at a star-studded Hollywood party, the man they called “The Duke” (John Wayne) would angrily storm out.

On one occasion when Warner eventually caught up with Wayne, he asked innocently, “What went wrong?”

“You screwed me!” said the hardbitten actor, according to Express news magazine.

“Duke, I know,” replied Warner. “But that would have happened anyway. And we’re your friends.”

Cheating and exploiting its stars has been a Hollywood way of life for more than a century, but few studios embraced that sadistic ethos more than Warner Bros.

In 1956, with movies losing profits to TV, Jack even duped his own brothers, persuading them to sell 90 percent of their stock to an investor, then making a secret deal to repurchase the shares and make himself studio president.

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

7 Comments on The Casting Couch of Hollywood’s Jewish Phallocrats

  1. I get the point of the article, however, most, if not nearly all of those females, were sluts and whores who knew exactly what they were doing. Women are not stupid and many of them are past masters of deception. They will do the deed/s and simultaneously play victim so as to cover all bases.

    A young naive virgin teenage girl? Sure that is wrong, but her parents created or allowed it to happen, as did Americans in general. A female who has s*cked and f*cked to get what she wants and has a goal in mind? No, she is not a victim and she is fully responsible for her actions.

    Women are not mentally retarded, and they are not moral creatures by default, in fact, the opposite is true, they lack morality and ethics unless instilled by a God-fearing father.

    • Doesn’t everyone lack morality and ethics then? I wouldn’t be so hard on women, the fairer sex. We all have our weakness’ which our enemies adroitly exploit.

    • It is true that some women were exploited, but on the other hand, many of those women cooperated quite willingly. Women have always been notorious for using sex to get what they want, and not just in the film industry.

  2. We have also lived in a total blame-the-victim culture for generations. The abusers’ behavior is always forgiven/excused by claiming the abused “asked for it” or “is a tramp anyway”.

  3. John Wayne’s real name was Marion Morrison….Morrison is USUALLY a crypto Jewish surname (or variations like Morris or Morrisett)

    Therefore Wayne probably had Jewish connections.The current Australian Prime Minister Morrison purports to be some sort of Christian….given his position he is very likely to be a crypto jew.
    Speaking of Australian crypto Jews…..during ww1 in Palestine a General Monash was in charge of Australian troops helping to clear out the Turkish troops in Palestine.
    Monash University in Melbourne (a Jewish stronghold and financial centre) was founded by a jew….the current premier of Victoria is a crypto jew with links to Israel.Next door is the NSW premier….who has the characteristic nose as a sure sign she is Jewish (to be confirmed…but it looks like other Australian state premiers are also crypto Jews.)

  4. HOW PEDOPHILIA CAME TO HOLLYWOOD:
    BILLY WILDER
    Screenwriter and director, Billy Wilder, has had an enormous impact on the public, as substantiated by his numerous Oscars and other film awards. Responsible for famous films like Hold Back the Dawn, Five Graves to Cairo, Double Indemnity, The Lost Weekend, Sunset Boulevard, Stalag 17, Sabrina and The Apartment, Wilder’s cinema successes were granted him as he was just another pawn who was utilized with satanic acumen to help abolish society’s established code of ethics. His own authorized biographer who worked closely with him, Maurice Zolotow, wrote:

    “Of course, I did not know what I was getting into when I had started this. It became, as all such journeys have become, a journey to find out the secret springs of this most devious and perverse of Hollywood’s personalities.”

    Wilder loved to transport the viewer into the depravity of his own heart and did this by tricking the censors who sought to enforce the old Hollywood Production Code of Hollywood’s “Golden Age.” Wilder recalls,

    “We had to operate cunningly to outwit the censors and this made us write more subtly.”
    What subtleties did he scatter throughout his films? Perversion. In his movie, The Major and the Minor, Wilder admits that the motif was child sexuality, stating:

    “Ray Milland falls in love with Ginger as a twelve year old child. We had here the first American movie about pedophilia. The Major is sexually aroused by her. He can’t help himself. I was worried that audiences would be shocked by this story, but it seems that they were not.”

    This goes to show that if a story is entertaining and “cute,” it can bypass the normal reaction to such filth and translate into apathetic disregard on the slippery slope of corruption. Where did this movie minister of perversion receive his material? Wilder was given his creative material by another supernatural force. In addition to stating that he is “demonically possessed and slightly crazed,” Zolotow reports of Wilder:

    “He could not stop his creative machinery from functioning. He was enslaved by his art…One sometimes felt as if one were moved by powerful invisible forces. I forgot to tell you that Wilder never starts a new screenplay without typing two words on the first page: Cum Deo (‘With God’). He has a pantheistic feeling about the universe.”

    Demon possession leads many from the truths of God to the pantheistic lies of the New Age movement because Satan uses those who will serve him most faithfully in preparing humanity to embrace him as the god of this world. Wilder’s responses upon completion of his show make it readily apparent which god he aligned himself with. Scientologist screenwriter of the Sound of Music, Ernest Lehman, recalls:

    “He looked at the heavens and screeched F— you!” It was…a victory cry, as if he were calling out to God and saying, ‘I completed this picture despite everything you did to make me surrender.'”
    Dr. Lycurgus Starkey rightly announced on the NBC network:
    “His movies have overturned all the sexual mores, glorified promiscuity, glamorized prostitution and elevated adultery to a virtue.”

    Dr. Starkey was prophetically right in predicting the social effect and outcome of Wilder’s films that we currently face in our day. The atheist author of communism, Karl Marx, explains the reasons why this is so:
    “The ideas of the ruling class are, in every age, the ruling ideas: i.e., the class which is the dominant material force in society is at the same time its dominant intellectual force. The class which has the means of material production at its disposal, has control at the same time over the means of mental production.”

    The gross immorality in Hollywood that makes its way on the screen and thus influences the masses reflects the lives of those who operate within it. An intimate friend of the late Steve McQueen related:
    “He’d kill for a part in a movie…he’d suck anyone’s [expletive]…he’d get f—– or f— anyone who’d get him a part in a show…then he’d wish-he’d pray- that person would have a heart attack or a stroke and die, and then there would be no way for anyone to know how McQueen had got the part.”

    This disgusting ambition is what keeps the infamous casting couch warm and desirous hopeful actors willing. Hollywood insider, Phyllis Diller, clarifies this fact:
    “The casting couch is the name of the game in Hollywood. I know there are stars, especially women, who have made a career from sexual favors.”

    Would you invite a person whom you knew to be ethically bankrupt and an absolute moral degenerate into your home to influentially instruct your wife, your husband, and your children or loved ones? These are the very ones that America invites into their home every night via the television to submissively share their lives with.

    Faye Dunaway said that the ghost of Joan Crawford is haunting her. Actress Jean Seberg believed that her “demons” kept her from ever being free. She stated:
    “The devils will stop that sort of stuff in a second. They ride right here. (Touching her collar bone with her fingers) Sitting here and here. There’s one on each side…these are both unfriendly influences. They tell me to run my car into other cars, or drive off a cliff.”

    A friend later reflected on her life and pin pointed the cause as the “acting classes at Columbia Studios…[which] had the power to influence Jean’s devils.” Like countless others in the Hollywood movie star system, this lead to psychiatric hospitals and suicide. Actor Sal Mineo was in regular contact with psychics and spoke of the “vibrations” of James Dean’s spirit that haunted him, stating, “I’ve got to get him off my back because I don’t want to join him down there.” Mineo was murdered under mysterious circumstances. Is fame worth the extorted fees that Satan demands of his servants of the silver screen?

    As Alan Alda declared:
    “There’s plenty of money to be had…But you also lose your soul.”

    JUDAISM AND THREE YEAR OLD BRIDES
    When the Prophet Jesus of Nazareth accused the Pharisees of His day of being Satan’s spiritual children, He fully realized what they were capable of. Second century Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai, one of Judaism’s very greatest rabbis and a creator of Kabbalah, sanctioned pedophilia — permitting molestation [raping] of baby girls even younger than three! He proclaimed, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and a day is permitted to marry a priest.” (1) Subsequent rabbis refer to ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia as “halakah”, or binding Jewish law. (2) Has ben Yohai, child rape advocate, been disowned by modern Jews? Hardly. Today, in ben Yohai’s hometown of Meron, Israel, tens of thousands of orthodox and ultra-orthodox Jews gather annually for days and nights of singing and dancing in his memory.
    References to pedophilia abound in the Talmud. They occupy considerable sections of Treatises Kethuboth and Yebamoth and are enthusiastically endorsed by the Talmud’s definitive legal work, Treatise Sanhedrin.

    THE PHARISEES ENDORSED CHILD SEX
    The rabbis of the Talmud are notorious for their legal hairsplitting, and quibbling debates. But they share rare agreement about their right to molest three year old girls. In contrast to many hotly debated issues, hardly a hint of dissent rises against the prevailing opinion (expressed in many clear passages) that pedophilia is not only normal but scriptural as well! It’s as if the rabbis have found an exalted truth whose majesty silences debate.
    Because the Talmudic authorities who sanction pedophilia are so renowned, and because pedophilia as “halakah” is so explicitly emphasized, not even the translators of the Soncino edition of the Talmud (1936) dared insert a footnote suggesting the slightest criticism. They only comment: “Marriage, of course, was then at a far earlier age than now.” (3)
    In fact, footnote 5 to Sanhedrin 60b rejects the right of a Talmudic rabbi to disagree with ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia: “How could they [the rabbis], contrary to the opinion of R. Simeon ben Yohai, which has scriptural support, forbid the marriage of the young proselyte?” (4)
    Endnotes:
    1 Yebamoth 60b, p. 402.
    2 Yebamoth 60b, p. 403.
    3 Sanhedrin 76a.
    4 In Yebamoth 60b, p. 404, Rabbi Zera disagrees that sex with girls under three years and one day should be endorsed as halakah.

    OUT OF BABYLON
    It was in Babylon after the exile under Nebuchadnezzar in 597 BC that Judaism’s leading sages probably began to indulge in pedophilia. Babylon was the staggeringly immoral capitol of the ancient world. For 1600 years, the world’s largest population of Jews flourished within it. [Ashkenazik Shinar (‘sin’) was a stone throw away from Sodom and Gomorrah – Any questions?]
    As an example of their evil, Babylonian priests said a man’s religious duty included regular sex with temple prostitutes. Bestiality was widely tolerated. So Babylonians hardly cared whether a rabbi married [raped] a three year old girl.
    But with expulsion of the Jews [‘Edomites, Pharisees, Ashkenazim, Khazars, Sephardim’] in the 11th century AD, mostly to western Christian lands, Gentile tolerance of Jewish pedophilia abruptly ended.
    Still, a shocking contradiction lingers: If Jews want to revere the transcendent wisdom and moral guidance of the Pharisees and their Talmud, they must accept the right of their greatest ancient sages to violate children. To this hour, no synod of Judaism has repudiated their vile practice.

    SEX WITH A “MINOR” PERMITTED
    What exactly did these sages say?
    The Pharisees justified child rape by explaining that a boy of nine years was not a “man” Thus they exempted him from God’s Mosaic Law: “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination” (Leviticus. 18:22) One passage in the Talmud gives permission for a woman who molested her young son to marry a high priest. It concludes, “All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not.” (5) Because a boy under 9 is sexually immature, he can’t “throw guilt” on the active offender, morally or legally. (6)
    A woman could molest a young boy without questions of morality even being raised: “…the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act.” (7) The Talmud also says, “A male aged nine years and a day who cohabits with his deceased brother’s wife acquires her (as wife).” (8) Clearly, the Talmud teaches that a woman is permitted to marry and have sex with a nine year old boy.

    SEX AT THREE YEARS & ONE DAY
    In contrast to Simeon ben Yohai’s dictum that sex with a little girl is permitted under the age of three years, the general teaching of the Talmud is that the rabbi must wait until a day after her third birthday. She could be taken in marriage simply by the act of rape. [these were the ‘precursors’ of Hillary, Pelosi, Kagan, Napolitano, Ginsburg, Boxer, Albright, Abzug, Goldman, Livni, ad nauseam]
    R. Joseph said: “Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his.” (Sanh. 55b)
    “A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by cohabitation …” (Yeb. 57b)
    A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabited with her she becomes his. (Sanh. 69a, 69b, also discussed in Yeb. 60b)
    It was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the women children that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, and Phineas (who was priest, the footnote says) surely was with them.” (Yeb. 60b)
    [The Talmud says such three year and a day old girls are] “… fit for cohabitation … But all women children, that have not known man by lying with him, it must be concluded that Scripture speaks of one who is fit for cohabitation.” (Footnote to Yeb. 60b)
    The example of Phineas, a priest, himself marrying an underage virgin of three years is considered by the Talmud as proof that such infants are “fit for cohabitation.”
    The Talmud teaches that an adult woman’s molestation of a nine year old boy is “not a sexual act” and cannot “throw guilt” upon her because the little boy is not truly a “man.” (9) But they use opposite logic to sanction rape of little girls aged three years and one day: Such infants they count as “women,” sexually mature and fully responsible to comply with the requirements of marriage.
    The Talmud footnotes 3 and 4 to Sanhedrin 55a clearly tell us when the rabbis considered a boy and girl sexually mature and thus ready for marriage. “At nine years a male attains sexual matureness… The sexual matureness of woman is reached at the age of three.”

    NO RIGHTS FOR CHILD VICTIMS
    The Pharisees were hardly ignorant of the trauma felt by molested children. To complicate redress, the Talmud says a rape victim must wait until she was of age before there would be any possibility of restitution. She must prove that she lived and would live as a devoted Jewess, and she must protest the loss of her virginity on the very hour she comes of age. “As soon as she was of age one hour and did not protest she cannot protest any more.” (10)
    The Talmud defends these strict measures as necessary to forestall the possibility of a Gentile child bride rebelling against Judaism and spending the damages awarded to her as a heathen – an unthinkable blasphemy! But the rights of the little girl were really of no great consequence, for, “When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (three years and a day) it is as if one put the finger into the eye.” The footnote says that as “tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.” (11)
    In most cases, the Talmud affirms the innocence of male and female victims of pedophilia. Defenders of the Talmud claim this proves the Talmud’s amazing moral advancement and benevolence toward children; they say it contrasts favorably with “primitive” societies where the child would have been stoned along with the adult perpetrator.
    Actually, the rabbis, from self-protection, were intent on proving the innocence of both parties involved in pedophilia: the child, but more importantly, the pedophile. They stripped a little boy of his right to “throw guilt” on his assailant and demanded complicity in sex from a little girl. By thus providing no significant moral or legal recourse for the child, the Talmud clearly reveals whose side it is on: the raping rabbi.

    PEDOPHILIA WIDESPREAD
    Child rape was practiced in the highest circles of Judaism . This is illustrated from Yeb. 60b:
    “There was a certain town in the land of Israel the legitimacy of whose inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Romanos who conducted an inquiry and found in it the daughter of a proselyte who was under the age of three years and one day, and Rabbi declared her eligible to live with a priest.”
    The footnote says that she was “married to a priest” and the rabbi simply permitted her to live with her husband, thus upholding “halakah” as well as the dictum of Simeon ben Yohai, “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest.” (12)
    These child brides were expected to submit willingly to sex. Yeb. 12b confirms that under eleven years and one day a little girl is not permitted to use a contraceptive but “must carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner.”
    In Sanhedrin 76b a blessing is given to the man who marries off his children before they reach the age of puberty, with a contrasting curse on anyone who waits longer. In fact, failure to have married off one’s daughter by the time she is 12-1/2, the Talmud says, is as bad as one who “returns a lost article to a Cuthean” (Gentile) – a deed for which “the Lord will not spare him.” (13) This passage says: “… it is meritorious to marry off one’s children whilst minors.”
    The mind reels at the damage to the untold numbers of girls who were sexually abused within Judaism during the heyday of pedophilia. Such child abuse, definitely practiced in the second century, continued, at least in Babylon, for another 900 years.

    A FASCINATION WITH SEX
    Perusing the Talmud, one is overwhelmed with the recurrent preoccupation with sex, especially by the most eminent rabbis. Dozens of illustrations could be presented to illustrate the delight of the Pharisees to discuss sex and quibble over its minutest details.
    The rabbis endorsing child sex undoubtedly practiced what they preached. Yet to this hour, their words are revered. Simeon ben Yohai is honored by Orthodox Jews as one of the very greatest sages and spiritual lights the world has ever known [!!!]. A member of the earliest “Tannaim,” rabbis most influential in creating the Talmud, he carries more authority to observant Jews than Moses.
    Today, the Talmud’s outspoken pedophiles and child-rape advocates would doubtlessly spend hard time in prison for child molestation. Yet here is what the eminent Jewish scholar, Dagobert Runes (who is fully aware of all these passages), says about such “dirty old men” and their perverted teachings:

    Endnotes:
    1 Yebamoth 60b, p. 402.
    2 Yebamoth 60b, p. 403.
    3 Sanhedrin 76a.
    4 In Yebamoth 60b, p. 404, Rabbi Zera disagrees that sex with girls under three years and one day should be endorsed as halakah.
    5 Sanhedrin 69b.
    6 Sanhedrin 55a.
    7 Footnote 1 to Kethuboth 11b.
    8 Sanhedrin 55b.
    9 Sanhedrin 55a.
    10 Kethuboth 11a.
    11 Kethuboth 11b.
    12 Yebamoth 60b.
    13 Sanhedrin 76b.

Post a Comment

Winter Watch
%d bloggers like this: