If a frog is suddenly put into a pot of boiling water, it will jump out. But if a frog is put into a pot of tepid water that is slowly brought to a boil, it will not perceive the danger and will allow itself to be boiled to death.
The banning and censorship of Alex Jones from various social media platforms is a thermometer event, a way for the Crime Syndicate (CS) to test the reactions of the enslaved frogs they’re slowly boiling. They move aggressively against Jones, a boogeyman they’ve created, see what happens, then proceed with the next thing. If the timing is right, they can take another freedom; and if not, they give Jones back to “his people” and use him a bit longer. They take things in fractions. When a soft rebellion occurs, they cede back an eighth of what they took.
This is not just conjecture. A leaked memo circulating among Senate Democrats contains a host of authoritarian proposals for regulating digital platforms, purportedly as a way to get tough on “Russian bots” and “fake news.” The memo suggests that in order to save trust in “our institutions, democracy, free press and markets,” we need unprecedented and undemocratic government intervention into online press and markets, including “comprehensive (GDPR-like) data protection legislation” of the sort enacted in the E.U. We have already gotten a good taste of this scheme in action.
Some of you may have heard of Issac Kappy. He is a B list Hollywood actor. This character has caught the zeitgeist of people who want pedogate justice. You can go to any of a number of YouTube videos (yes, he is still on YouTube) and find Kappy singing like a canary about Hollywood pedophiles. He accuses Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg of being pedos — yet, he offers no proof, just hearsay. He drops other names wily nilly. He accuses his friend Seth Green and wife of being pedos based on some sketchy things Green allegedly said. But he has not seen Green directly involved with children. Even if the accusations ultimately have elements of truth, his methods invite blow back, even from me.
Caveat: see comment below, Bombard thinks Kappy believes his own stories/line even if he is only a a true eyewitness to sketchy statements.
Look at Kappy’s online persona. He’s an actor playing a script. He just looks unbalanced and out of control. The Crime Syndicate will test the boiling frogs by proclaiming to the public that innocent targets need to be protected from mentally deranged “conspiracy theorists” like the caricature Issac Kappy. Yes, it is all so contrived.
The game here per usual is gaslighting, chipping away at free speech rights and even locking up people for mental health issues.
A secondary goal is to embarrass and shame decent citizen investigators, like Nathan Stolpman of “Lift the Veil.” Stolpman interviews people like Kappy to hear his story. Once Kappy goes down, then all real pedogate whistle blowers who appear on non-MSM outlets are diminished.
However, some are confusing what Nathan did as “promoting” Kappy and have thus attacked him. I don’t see Nathan as a party to this operation. I listened to the Kappy interview, and Stolpman did not endorse him and preceded as a neutral party, IMO. So attacking Stolpman serves the CS’ purposes by stifling investigation and setting up a damned-if-you-do/damned-if-you-don’t scenario.
Also, look for a staged deception directed at major Lugenpresse. It will be a rerun of Roanoke or Charlie Hebdo. See; Roanoke Shooting: If You Believed This, You’ll Believe Anything
A crazed MAGA or Qanon fake persona will do it. The media is actively signaling that they are at risk, so they will assume a victimhood stance and demand “something be done.” Most likely, this shooter will “have all the signs” that law enforcement missed leading to more calls for pre-crime detention and “intervention.” See: Crime Syndicate Scheming for Implementation of Pre-Crime Powers
It is all so contrived. The boiling frogs won’t have a clue.
Check out Paul Romano’s video below: “Did CNN’s Brian Seltzer just predict the next big event?”