News Ticker

Frankist Leo Strauss, the Neocons and the Synarchist Conspiracy


Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the intellectual godfather of the modern neoconservative movement. Strauss, of German-Jewish descent, immigrated to America in 1937. As a made man, he was immediately picked up and placed in the Rockefeller-funded University of Chicago. Strauss was brought to the university by its Chancellor, Robert Maynard Hutchins, one of the original sponsors of the Aspen Institute and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

So once again, we see the active and aggressive role of foundations [see: Reece Committee Report from 1954 Shows Foundations Funded the Collectivist Capture of US Education] in getting this twisted, inverted (((talent))) and legacy set up in the United States. As one digs deeper, you will also discover self-serving tracts, mostly written by pseudo-intellectual supremacist Jews cheer-leading their homeboy Strauss.

Strauss believed that within societies and nations, some people are fit to lead and others only to be led. However, rather than rule by merit in the wise philosopher-king model, Strauss incorporated Machiavellian thinking. He also slipped in unscrupulous Frankist doctrine by saying virtue would not be applicable, because no regime could meet its standards. Rather, a new regime should be created by harnessing man’s tendency for self-interest, or “human nature.” Strauss knowingly, or through osmosis, was a defacto leading proponent of the twisted and inverted Sabatteean-Frankist agenda.

Strauss believed that rule should be by chosenites, who were most adept at deceiving the public. He claimed truth needs to be hidden or suppressed or the masses would quickly succumb to anarchy. They “can’t handle the truth,” Strauss said. In his twisted, warped, Luciferian mind this is the “Noble Lie.” His legacy is described in the following film.

Like Thomas Hobbes, the twisted Strauss believed that “because mankind is intrinsically wicked, he has to be governed.” Furthermore, he combined deceit with manufactured boogeymen. “Such governance can only be established, however, when men are united ­ and they can only be united against other people.”

In “Leo Strauss and the American Right,” Shadia Drury wrote, “Strauss, following Machiavelli, maintained that if no external threat exists then one has to be manufactured.”

These Straussian types are less restrained by conventions and more capable of resorting to terror and other criminal measures, “if such measures are effective in accomplishing the desired end.” In Strauss’ case, his view that Machiavellian ends justify the means was married with his conversion to political Zionism. This plague has also been merged with a crackpot Americanism mythos that the U.S. and its bogus kleptocratic “democracy” is the only source for “good” in the world and should be supported or else “evil” will prevail.

These Frankists write books, like Samuel Huntington’s “Clash of Civilizations,” and trot out Thomas Freidman (both Zionists) to propagate these schemes.

And not a day passes now on this planet without humanity battling with this egotist-Luciferian philosophy. Thus describes the dominant mentality of the Crime Syndicate that we write about on these pages.

This manufactured scam puts forth a dialectic, or the resolution of opposites. This scheme is referred to as the “synarchist conspiracy.” Then these are deliberately fostered and  manipulated. Synarchy came to mean “rule by secret societies” and has an overlay of occultism. Richard F. Kuisel, a specialist in 20th-century French political history, called it “government by an initiated elite.” Comedian George Carlin called it “The Club” and “you ain’t in it.”

The process of control was described by Postel du Mas, who wrote the “Synarchist Pact,” which is based on the “four orders that correspond to the Hindu caste system.” The system contends that a “division of people into order is natural and conforms with tradition.” It sets out a program for “invisible revolution,” or “revolution from above,” meaning taking over a state from within by infiltrating high offices.

The New Nationalist’s Prescribed Model

Our model is more trusting, loving and nurturing to its people. TNN believes in the principle that blood indeed runs thick. One will always feel the most love and attachment toward his own kind and kin. Thus, in harder times, this is a natural support network.

This does not mean feeling no sympathy toward others or the need to create enemies in the contrived, gamed manner the neocons do. In fact, a prime duty of the State is to protect blood, kin and nation from the previously described predatory synarchist Crime Syndicate that has been unleashed on the world. TNN national intel focuses on preventing and restraining infiltration of secret in-groups and kleptocrats with agendas. The nation should allow reasonable immigration, provided that migrants follow migration laws, blend in and conform well with cultural, language, and social norms of the host country.

This is not elitist but rather based on merit and service. It holds honesty and truth as a high virtue. The best leader is one who serves for a period and then goes home. George Washington is a good model. The ideal nation would best be ruled by non-materialistic, devout, selfless people — the complete opposite of the American Straussian model — who feel right at home among their people, practicing prosperity at home and respect abroad.

7 Comments on Frankist Leo Strauss, the Neocons and the Synarchist Conspiracy

  1. I never believe (((those))) who say they are atheists. It’s a ruse to make you feel more comfortable with them, to portray themselves as modern and progressive, and to absolve themselves of any involvement with the actions of their brotherhood. That label is most likely a facade for Satanist tendancies because it implies that they know more than those who still believe in anything. I’ve met (((many))) who disavow their religion, but they are still benefiting from its privileges as heads of companies, school districts, universities etc. Atheists indeed.

    • I also wonder on the growing germanic paganism, aryan hedonism in Europe and the West is causing concern for them as it doesn’t fit their troika global vision of Arab-Jude-Christian. “Player 4 has joined the game” of a germanic paganism aught to make things interesting.

      • Most intriguing, what form does this germanic paganism/aryan hedonism take exactly?- it has satanic undertones (do what you want) if so, then it’s actually the mantra of the Sabbatean-Frankists whose goal is to obliterate all the “book” religions, as weak and corrupted as they may be and prepare us for a return to endless trauma.

        • I only say that after brief research on the internet of its growing popularity in smaller villages in England, Western Europe and the Viking Paganism movement that seems to be growing. I am only assuming the people who follow this aren’t as susceptible to falling into the just war/invasion gimmicks but they might themselves be far removed from current events to not care as well. Might be a homework assignment for me

          • Did my homework, ancient Norse and Germanic pantheon, fairly conservative values. Seems like a valid reaction to the whole progressive agenda on the loose across the planet. Is there an Asian equivalent? Do they need one? Shinto? Well, the Abramics could use a little competition I think, couldn’t accuse them of anti-semitism since they’re against 3 religions not just one. Hmmm…

            • More local based themes and associations are prevalent in those religions versus global understanding, consciousness seen in abrahamic faiths.

  2. Well, after sitting through 4 years with one of Strauss’s best students; Harry V Jaffa while at Claremont, I can attest that the context from which you are speaking is not fully accurate. In Natural Right and History, Strauss goes out of his way to argue what he believes to be as the only alternative to his dogmatism, that being Nihilism. For it is human nature that defines law, Positive Law, or man made law, and aside from divine law, he concludes that the modern scientific revolution has placed humanity into the difficult spot of accepting Nietzsche’s view that we have no immutable nature and are essentially glorified Apes on a relativistic continuum. What we view as Slavery at one point in history could be deemed as merciful and yet at another, a travesty.

    Where you are correct is that Strauss’s views have been usurped by neocons under a type of moral justification for taking the battle to “them” before awaiting the sight of conflict and many of his supporters viewed Islam as the number 1 threat due simply to demographics and its contradictory logic related to human nature. This was indeed a convenient political philosophy for those seeking geopolitical expansion, such as Zionism. And the Evangelicals loved it as well.

    Strauss himself was an Athiest, To be a Lucifarian, he would have to believe in god. You cant have Evil without the presence of Good. Strauss believed Good existed but Like Socrates, it was impossible to define. His closest definitions of good aligned with Aristotles views.

Post a Comment

%d bloggers like this:
Secured By miniOrange