South Africa’s (RSA) nutwing President Jacob Zuma is gone; however, in a nightmarish turn of events, Zuma has been replaced with one Cyril Ramaphosa, who threatens to be even worse. See: New South African ‘Leader’ Moves Forward with Land Confiscation Directed Against White Farmers.
Ramaphosa recently addressed the nation’s parliament in Cape Town and spoke about the original European colonists in the 1600s taking land from the indigenous tribes. Ramaphosa called this “original sin” and stated that he wants to see “the return of the land to the people from whom it was taken … to heal the divisions of the past.”
There has been an increase of late in murders and attacks of white farmers in RSA. As is typical of any hidden ethnic cleansing, the data is convoluted and difficult to ascertain. To put this in proper perspective it appears that attacks run under a thousand a year, and murders under a hundred. However the threat of land seizure without compensation has been made by government officials including the president.
With abuses and basic rights violations against whites increasing in South Africa, the concept of “right of return” has been put forth. The alternative term is “right of abode.” Ghana has one for folks of African origin, and of course Israel is the most well known.
As it currently stands, many white South Africans who try to apply for citizenship to European countries, such as the Netherlands and U.K., are rejected outright. Many of these white South Africans seeking citizenship are direct descendants of the very same European nations that reject them. In the ultimate gesture of extreme political correctness (and hypocrisy), these same countries promote open borders for individuals (aka migrants) of non-European descent.
At the core of this issue is “waving the bloody flag of apartheid” and generalized anti-white demonization. The contorted logic is that if one supports the human rights on South African whites, then you support apartheid and are “racist”. Secondly it is perceived as embarrassing to the incompetent, corrupt majority government of South Africa. But try and explain the bloody flag of apartheid sophistry to the kids in this photo. Whites are a small minority of 8.4% (4.5 million) and their political power and influence has long since been diminshed.
Concerned people can see how the issue is framed in the conversation on the video below on South African media. This is in response to a petition to the EU promoting the right of return (RoR). You can sign the petition here.
-The diminishers in this video seem to react and object to the term “ethnic cleansing.”
Takeaway: TNN covered the essentials in Part I. South Africa, in general, is an extremely dangerous country for all races. Whites as a minority are subject to majority rule, which includes reliance on black policing and open displays of racial hatred.
In a literal sense, the threat of Julius Malema, the leader of South Africa’s Economic Freedom Fighters (communist and very anti-white), is not “ethnic cleansing” precisely, — at least not yet. The diminishers can quibble over terminology, but The New Nationalist (TNN) hardly sees that as worthy of air time.
“The land must be expropriated without compensation. We are not calling for the slaughter of white people, at least for now.”
So for the purposes of dealing with politically correct shadow-language propagandists, I propose using the term “under ethnic threat.” Indeed, Genocide Watch rates the threat assessment as 6 on a scale of 8. The following graphic rates safety and personal security issues in South Africa. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist or much empathy to see that being in a disliked minority race in this shit-storm environment would be gut wrenching and is not to be taken lightly.
-The gentleman in the interview suggested that South African whites are indeed being legislated against and, in general, suffer from bad governance.
Takeaway: The talking-head propagandists are using a “come half clean” technique here. The other hack grudgingly agrees but chimes in by saying these RoR issues will set South Africa back- as if progress had been made. The gentleman effectively agrees and calls RoR an “extreme” position. Illustrating the typical “legislated against” point was the incredible step that the South African government took to ban international tennis, rugby, soccer and cricket events within the country because the clubs were too white. This was all “evaluated” under the Orwellian term “transformation barometer.”
-A talking head suggested promotion of RoR isn’t necessary as hundreds of thousands of whites have already left South Africa.
Takeaway: Yes, some well off whites have left. But TNN’s concern is more for the large numbers of impoverished white South Africans more so than the well to do and connected. Those trapped people will need aid and assistance in relocating.
-There is an awful, dull and absurd inference by these talking heads (at 4:00) that the people signing the petition “aren’t even South African” and, therefore, should just ignore injustices. These nasty stooges go so far as blast the organizer of the petition because he is Brazilian.
Takeaway: Complete and utter nonsense. Sign the petition whether you are American, European, Latin American or of any race. Black leaders in South Africa have openly spoken of “encouraging” the whites to leave. Very well then, sign the petition. TNN will not bury its head in the sand and we cannot be swayed by such cheap-shot shaming and gaslighting tactics and, in fact, need to push back aggressively.
TNN conducted an extensive open source search on how this RoR and other white South Africa challenges are faring. Unfortunately, it appears the major SA NGOs are still involved with waving the bloody flag.
If there is an single important NGO or well-funded foundation concerned with white South African civil or human rights, please contact us or comment below. TNN would like to support you. Are there any NGOs supporting white South African immigration to Europe? Let us know. TNN would like to support you.
The Afrikaner organizations are preparing for self-defense, but seem hard pressed and on their heels. This folks have three-hundred year roots in SA and it looks like they wish to stay and, if necessary, fight. Again, TNN is concerned with the impoverished group, the forgotten people who have less voice and means to defend themselves. Not everybody wants to fight and die in a race war.
There are charities feeding 800,000 low-income and squatter whites in the country. This, too, was covered in Part I. TNN readers can donate here.
A Solution in Australia?
Peter Dutton, the long-besieged [see; African Gangs: A Plague Upon Melbourne], Australia Home Affairs Minister in Australia, has proposed fast tracking immigration of South African white farmers. Par for the course, this has been met with blow back from the usual suspects. A so-called “Human Rights Watch” organization has been highly critical. Do a Google search for “South African immigration to Australia” over last month and you will see a cheap, tawdry Trotskyite smear campaign directed against Dutton personally.
There is public support for this in Australia. But the foreign affairs minister, Julie Bishop, has warned Australia would be not be making special visa considerations for white South African farmers. Thus, this, too, will likely be stymied. Again, ultimately the real issue will be the fate of white South Africans of lesser means, and even the courageous Dutton’s efforts won’t help this sector of the population.