News Ticker

Dr. Jordan Peterson Speaks Truth to Power, Obliterates SJW Ideology

Traditionally, journalists are the ones who are supposed to speak truth to power. But, in the present-day war on culture, power resides with those that brainwash our society, especially its impressionable youth. For youth, cultural normative values are derived largely from media and institutes of education. These agencies have indoctrinated an entire generation worldwide in a post-modern neo-Marxist ideology. Voices of those who do not subscribe to this ideology are drowned out, marginalized, demonized and relegated to virtual gulags.

But once in a while and at least for now, the system lets slip through the cracks — or perhaps allows to exist — a voice of reason, someone who challenges neo-Marxist group think (aka “political correctness”). Such is the case with University of Toronto professor and clinical psychologist Dr. Jordan Peterson. For many years, he has been working to help a generation of people steeped in institutionalized egalitarianism and identity politics overcome the programming to which they’ve been subjected. That’s no small task, and the folks at The New Nationalist (TNN) applaud his efforts.

Over the years, I’ve watched Peterson’s lectures and must say that, for me anyway, there’s nothing particularly enlightening in them. It’s like preaching to the choir and he is quality old school. He simply and succinctly explains the way the world works. (Isn’t that what teachers are supposed to do?) For Millennials, however, his words seem to run the gamut from heresy to revolutionary.

Where Peterson really shines is in debate. He’s highly intelligent and masterful at defeating the shallow and hypocritical rhetoric of SJWs. He recognizes neurolinguistic programming (NLP) tactics, diffuses gas lighters and does not suffer fools.

Last week, political correspondent Cathy Newman of Channel 4 News in the U.K. interviewed Peterson. Why? Because this news channel’s corporate mission is to place a “spotlight on injustice,” and Peterson has garnered a sizable Youtube following with his videos that challenge the precepts of Social Justice Warriors (SJWs).

To be fair, Channel 4 posted the interview on Youtube largely unedited. Peterson tweeted his appreciation of that. Thus far, the interview has had 2.4 million views, and the ratio of likes to dislikes is almost 100 to 1 with an overwhelmingly positive response among its 48,000 comments. TNN has come to the conclusion that this interview was a pivotal moment in the social justice “wars.” We have never seen a more graphic example of the SJW movement exposed in quite this manner.

Did Newman even bother to watch any of Mr. Peterson’s lectures to prepare for the interview? She came to the ring armed only with “righteous indignation” and appeals to emotion. Newman’s NLP tactics against Peterson and how he deals with it provides a textbook study. That’s the main takeaway for TNN readers. Newman repeatedly tries to pigeonhole him with her overused phrase “so what you’re saying is,” and he repeatedly turns it back on her — so much so that this particular NLP phrase ought to be redefined as “pulling a Cathy Newman.”

After Peterson challenged and defeated all of Newman’s assumptions, Channel 4 chose to play the last cheap trick in the SJW deck: the victim stance. The news channel claimed “mean things” were being said about Newman online. It then doubled down with a claim that it had to hire security specialists to protect her.

The Daily Mirror and The Telegraph jumped on board as well, running hyperbolic headlines like this:

This cheap trick should kick off the Streisand Effect, meaning that even more viewers will watch the interview to see what the fuss is all about. TNN biggest concern is that Peterson will be framed in some manner by this cabal.

Of course, playing the victim card sparked a well-deserved firestorm of demands for proof of such threats. So far, no evidence has been forthcoming. TNN skimmed about 500 You Tube comments as a sampling. We noticed some name calling, as well as many women in support of Peterson, but we found nothing that would even remotely qualify as a threat — unless criticism and satire is being conflated to the level of a threat.

Other webizens like Hequal did a thorough check of Twitter, added up all the tweets, retweets and likes, and provide the following tally. Keep in mind that some of the “violence” against Peterson was expressed by neck-beard cuck supporters of Newman.

Non-sexist violence aimed at Newman or her supporters: 2 (one was made by a woman)

Sexist violence aimed at Newman or her supporters: 0

Non-sexist violence aimed at Peterson or his supporters: 8

Sexist violence aimed at Peterson or his supporters: 55

But, as we always say, look and decide for yourselves. Don’t just take our or Channel 4’s word for it.

There was standard derision and mockery, mostly of the “you’re out of your league” variety. There was a small amount of nastiness (such as use of the word “bitch”), but this is Youtube for heaven’s sake, not an intellectual forum. (Get with the current year, Channel 4!) In general, we would rank the comments as partisan but within the prevailing social media culture. This was about the nastiest one we found, and even it made a sound point using satire.

If nothing else, Peterson will probably be able to thank Channel 4 for a big boost in sales of his new book “12 Rules for Life,” which is set to be released on Jan. 23. His online series on personal growth strategies is well worth watching.

For more on the use of NLP implants and anchoring, the following video is excellent.

36 Comments on Dr. Jordan Peterson Speaks Truth to Power, Obliterates SJW Ideology

  1. Nothing can be solved unless Jews get all the credit they deserve for this fiasco and Jordon Peterson from what I have heard, won’t broach that topic, thus making him part of the status quo quibblers who like shuffling deck chairs

      • From my perspective, a better approach would be to identify the contradictions inherent in Cathy Newman’s logic. That is, to lure her into including Race and then Religion into pay gaps..She will certainly bite that non whites are also disproportionately disadvantaged much as women are…Then…She’s open to recognize that (((Certain Religions))) too are also disproportionately represented… He would have to do this without mentioning any religion, but to engage in a more Socratic like dialogue. “Hey Cathy, would you also feel compelled to argue for those whose religious beliefs hinder progress in Finance, Media, and Politics..If someone could prove that one religion is overly represented at the top?” Cathy? Cathy???

    • He calls out neo-Marxist ideology, and I think that’s about as close as someone in his position can get without committing professional suicide. That’s the way it goes. Meanwhile, for the most part, I think he does good work, and good work should be acknowledged.

      • Praising the intellectuals that insure the safety from scrutiny of the elites behind the curtain, is a sure way to keep those elites behind the curtain. It goes without saying anyone in the MSM agrees to lie for power and should only be addressed by us with this fact prominently displayed
        Since there is little in the way of real resistance, this obvious fact has been hidden well
        This hero of yours has in blanket terms defamed racists since this screed. Wanna change your position?
        I personally don’t agree with making allowances for “cucking” unless you are supporting the NWO (which then makes it your job)

        • I never called him “my hero” or implied as much. Putting those words in my mouth is insulting. Again, the article merely highlighted a video in which Peterson identified and dispatched shadow language and hidden biases of this broadcast journalist. We viewed it as a useful, notable. It’s not an article about Peterson or his world views and contributions. You have a problem with him, fine. So noted, repeatedly. This guy is on your shit list for some reason. You’ve researched him and track his activity. And you want to use my post to show off your knowledge about the guy. That would be fine — but you’re also taking jabs at me. That’s not okay. So I will say this for the last time: WE HAVE NO INTEREST in researching Peterson or his views. We don’t care what he did yesterday or does tomorrow. He’s a minnow in a sea of sharks. He’s not relevant in any way to who we are or what we do. The post was not an endorsement of him but rather an acknowledgement of a good interview. RE: Am I going to change my position? I never offered a “position” on Peterson, and I’m not going to allow you to assign one to me. And I’m not going to be dragged down some purity spiral or trolled.

          • fair enough, I have found some ppl initially defending him and then hearing him defame the whole racialist movement over and over, equivocate their support (which is a good sign, Timothy Fitzpatrick on twitter). I think I and my friends had noted this in the guy before I brought it up here.
            What I have noted is this is chronic in the movement. Ex – David Cole, still promoted for his investigations though he self-outed himself in his book as an infiltrator in 2014 and defames racialists today and promotes the zionist agenda
            It’s hard for me to believe that the Jews, who are winning would be so generous with the support of a goy in a field but was considered too truthy about Jews.
            I’ve said many times I like this sites work and your work. I didn’t notice you complain then
            So, no, I don’t just clap hands on que, sorry

            • As far the minnow goes, he was heavily promoted by the owned alternative media and main media. Everyone or thing is a minnow when you consider the totality of the subversion . Maybe it’s fine with you that he blanketly defames racialists with one brush ( not to mention his staunch defense of Jewry). That spells enemy to me and I assumed we were on the same side ….or are you just making a living and don’t care? I think it’s a huge issue and here’s a gun if you just want to get it over with cause we are about “cooked” as it is

          • Why won’t you take a position? SO, I’ll end with this, “Do you think it’s a good idea to support people who unequivocally claim you and your racialist friends are the enemy without noting the problem he presents for us”….. and by writing him up you do support his work

            Also, it’s really not that personal but a drama to demonstrate for our followers what should be strongly scrutinized. Even if you think I am your enemy, on the fight with global tyranny, we should be allies

            • I was exchanging e mails with Torchy on this subject before she went to bed US time. I don’t think she ever saw or read JP’s ridiculous suck up commentary about Jewish power. For those who haven’t seen it:
              https://jordanbpeterson.com/psychology/on-the-so-called-jewish-question/

              She was only aware that he refused to address it on stage when ambushed. She has been out of the loop on various personal matters for a couple months. She has some catching up to do on a number of items- and most are more important.

              And in fairness to her I wrote at least half of the article to begin with.

              In principle l though I prefer cutting people some slack. Like what it do with all the Trumptards who fell for that scam- disown them? If they see the light, work on rehabbing them, and not just relentless shaming.

              • thanks for clarifying. I decided three years ago to be an irritant due to the fact of a certain tolerance for counter productive behavior in the movement. It really clarified for me when Deanna Spingola blatantly shilled for Sandy Hook in the form of Jew-holocaust denial tactics like defamation against Sandy Hook truth
                I noted NO ONE, and I mean no one outside of we the people penalized her for the very counterproductive behavior
                I was new to writing at the time but here is some of what was going down. The writer peer group gave her pass. They need to hold their peers to account in my opinion
                It hasn’t made me popular but some are coming to see the necessity

                https://blindlight.org/index.php/all-psyops/item/45-trickle-down-sandy-hook-psyop-in-transition?highlight=WyJzYW5keSIsImhvb2siLCJob29rJ3MiLCJzYW5keSBob29rIl0=

                https://blindlight.org/index.php/author-sign-up/search?q=Sandy+Hook&Search=

                • I get what you are doing. In the case of staged deceptions and hoaxes there are many otherwise good contributing people who just don’t see this the way you and I do. It is a source of real frustration personally, but we have to realize that the black magic and propaganda is very thick. In general I say never burn bridges.

                  • Controlled opposition is ppl that appear to be resisting the powers that be but in reality are there to guide it for TPTB after, often times, false flags.

                    If a false flag is describing reality for the goy and the goy believing it, these leaders promote the Jewish explanation by pretending it’s above criticism.

                    Now, aint that a fine kettle! I dare say without the 911 false flag, few of us would be here and even know about the JQ.

                    Why in heaven’s name are we assuming the explanations from known liars are real when it took a false flag to clue us in and ppl like us to promote it’s reality?
                    I tell you why. Plants in the movement are more powerful than those posters and leaders who are authentic.

                    There is no way to tackle that without making some huge waves due to the size of the problem and the lessening of time

                    I was shocked when all the peer group of leader guides accepted Spingola’s behavior. I am shocked that MC Piper is looked to as some sort of hero when he proved he was a shill also (Sandy Hook, probably others)
                    I am shocked when David Cole gets a nod from old holocaust revisionists after what transpired with his 2nd ID doxxing and his admittance he infiltrated from the get go

                    Then you have other subverters doxxing a Cole after the fact, when his book tour is over to get trust points from their audience (Brandon Martinez)
                    We need to have bridges of communication here and deemphasize what isn’t necessary but with the ops in such strong positions, they would clearly fight us every step of the way and it could be very ugly. A lone dissenter is ignorable which I have mostly been
                    Thanks for the update Russ!

                    • by that, I mean i have been willing to on circumstantial speculation, pose questions about this problem. I am not ignoring the valuable work you and your other writers have done

                    • Look at the movement falling apart as the alt-lite takes over from the right. Will Mathew Heimbach be the next Christian Picciolini or will it be Matt Parrot. Cantwell, is a fed, he was outed. All these things I speculated on, called divisive, didn’t join groups so I could speculate on. Andrew Anglin really did a one eighty in 6 months in 2013 and got the whole WN communities blessing. Houston, we got a huge problem

                    • The David Cole case is illustrative. I will lay good odds that the older DC was worked over, compromised, and rewarded for changing his tune. In the beginning (despite what he now claims) he was a young idealistic man, in fact a warrior. Some of his work is classic. He has been reduced to a cynical weak drunk (party animal as he calls himself). Sad really, but I haven’t walked in his shoes. The real story is what he was subjected to besides being beaten to within an inch of his life.

                    • the problem there is, you can’t discount that that whole narrative was an excuse to change assignments. The beating may well have been staged, a hoax. There is no automatic location where we can be safe from a Jewish deception and they are the most dangerous. For instance, Weev it is claimed served jail time. How do we know that. How do we know Joshua Goldberg is in jail or shackled? We are always taking someones word. It’s why I say I choose to believe in Hitler, not that I know he was legit. We need a hero but your source 9 times out ten is agenda driven and no telling what has been changed in the selling. I do know Cole says he was an infiltrator from the beginning. I also know it is tempting for those who were taken in to say, no he’s lying for Jewish approval here, then they no longer are the guy who was duped to sell a subversive’s work and we all know, they can do very good work for entry

                    • I HAVE LEARNED TO USE MY GUT AFTER FORMING AN ANALYSIS ABOUT HOW THEY RULE US AND HOW INBRED THIS RULING HAS BECOME IN OUR PSYCHE (NO REASON FOR CAPS)
                      i’LL LET IT GO IF YOU DON’T COMMENT FURTHER 🙂

                    • The real McCoys among the Judiacs are the best ones for the goons to turn. I still think the young DC was the real McCoy.He was impeccable during that period. DC in Auschwitz:

                      Then he went underground after having the “conversation” (i.e beating) and made the deal with Earl and Irv the JDL goons. Later he reinvents himself as the GOP party animal, which is no big deal. Then he is outed, and the goons decide to really exploit him- and he goes full tilt shill. I may be wrong, but that’s how I see it. Other cases are similar.

                    • Did you ever see this clip. DC looks like shit, and is talking about his experience with the late JDL goons Irv and Earl. No love lost there, and he even has a video clip of how creepy Irv and Earl were. This too is a no holds barred classic.

                    • I really take this stuff as WWE performing. Now, here he is doing what he later claimed was “lowering” himself to promoting his book on alt media websites. He had to hold his nose to pretend to like us he inferred. Again, no proof, extreme skepticism… Now, This doesn’t reflect well on Ingrid, promoting a traitor. Clearly sheckles over loyalty and come to think of it, she’s always been after the mon, noticed that right away when I became aware of her
                      Yea, Ernst doesn’t want to come off as a boob so he’s going to say David was serious. Of course the ;less flattering take, Ernst was part of the psyop. Clearly Jews allowed that courtroom drama.At this point, I doubt a lot of the old timers, who getting used to failing, start taking money to avoid this, push that
                      Here’s Ingrid’s promotion and it makes me sick that she does not qualify this to warn her audience. It almost makes her compromised without knowing anything more

                    • I wonder why the goy need a Jew to lead the way, why they assume more credible often if he claims to join them? When will the goy learn? Wish I was God and had the answer but I think you can see we deserve our slavery being so easily fooled and controlled

                    • I thought there was a photo of his beating. We could compare against his account – given how frequently tribe members can’t get their stories straight.

                    • There may be a photo of him,after, which means nothing because you can stage that. Now I am just saying, since he’s a self admitted infiltrator, we can’t automatically take his word for anything

                    • My rule of thumb, no matter how good the act, chronic liars shouldn’t be believed without very good proof and that means crisis actor aware good proof

                    • If he’s assigned elsewhere, he has to have a good reason. Recall he disowned all prior statements of his advocacy in roughly 1999

                    • The, shills do their best work in the beginning. They can pretty much expose unbelievable stuff due to the distracted 90% and their compartmentalization of dissent which is how they got us, all with slightly different ideologies, problematic enough to insure we don’t join hands with others. I have been addressing this issue for three years, even talked about a Hitlerian Pyramid to combat the masonic one ( I was more unaware of troll domination at the time). SO yes, they have an advantage cause the close calls were probably staged in his “secret” work which likely wasn’t secret and got hints of facts not available to us to assure he’s considered top notch
                      I take the protocols very seriously. “Success” is always arranged

Post a Comment

%d bloggers like this:
Secured By miniOrange