The latest round of Podesta emails reveals a plot to rig polling through “oversampling.” A second method of vote rigging freely admitted to in the emails is massive illegals voting via the use of shoddy IDs at the ballot box. The polling fraud tactics are listed in this document in some detail.
Podesta weighs in on voter fraud:
“I think Teddy’s idea scratches the itch, is pretty safe and uncomplicated. On the picture ID, the one thing I have thought of in that space is that if you show up on Election Day with a drivers license with a picture, attest that you are a citizen, you have a right to vote in Federal elections.”
Note: Almost half of new drivers licenses issued in California went to illegal aliens.
The polls are revealing extreme-outlier results, suggesting some are badly flawed. ABC’s national poll shows a Clinton landslide: Clinton 50%, Trump 38%, Johnson 5%, Stein 2%. The poll with the best track record over the last three presidential elections gave Donald Trump a 2-plus percentage-point edge over Hillary Clinton on Saturday. The Investor’s Business Daily/TIPP tracking poll has Trump with 42.1% and Clinton with 39.7%. Here is the bizarre skew of the major polls:
“METHODOLOGY – This ABC News poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone Oct. 20-22, 2016, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 874 likely voters. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points, including the design effect. Partisan divisions are 36-27-31 percent, Democrats – Republicans – Independents.”
Pew Research shows voters identifying as Democrats exceeds Republicans by 4%, not 9%.
An even more absurd battleground state poll was conducted by the Arizona Republic. The methodology used 54.2% women and 45.8% men. Worse, they identified 57% as Democrats, 24% as Republicans and 19% as Independent. Given these parameters, the outcome of a 5% Clinton lead in this poll should be of great concern to Democrats.
These pollsters don’t provide data on the racial and demographic mix of their polls, which makes it impossible to “fact check” the bias. I suggest the racist, sexist, xenophobic, deplorables-shaming strategies of the Clinton-backed MSM might cause some to hesitate to answer honestly to a political poll. They may surprise by expressing their true sentiments at the ballot box, similar to the Brexit vote. Trump supporters have had it with the media, with Trump going so far as to recommend they go the alt sources on the internet. If nothing else, Trump has hurt the corrupt and (((controlled media))) badly. Here is what he just proposed,
“As an example of the power structure I’m fighting, AT&T is buying Time Warner and thus CNN, a deal we will not approve in my administration because it’s too much concentration of power in the hands of too few. He also said he would look at “breaking” up Comcast’s acquisition of NBC Universal in 2013. “Deals like this destroy democracy.”
Then the question is who will turn out? The crowds at Clinton events are a farce. In Ohio Trump just pulled 30,000. In national fundraising he recently received $9 million within 24 hours from 125,000 grassroots donors, a very impressive milestone. There is no evidence that Trump’s base is bleeding — in fact, the opposite.
Of course, the illegal-voter variable throws the properly constructed polls out the window as Trump’s build-a-big-wall proposal might promise to turn illegals out in droves. The question: Would illegals risk identifying themselves at a polling place or just stay away? The Trump campaign is organizing to monitor this, which of course opens the way for some bad exchanges on Election Day, which I am sure the media will be reporting.
Verdict: In a fair and truthful election, the outcome could very well see Trump come in over the top. However, the elements of large-scale voter fraud by illegal aliens and the control by George Soros interests of the vote counting in key battleground states will lead to a faux democracy synthetic mandate for Hillary Clinton.
From my perspective, Trump has picked up his game. TNN has made its position known: Basically, Clinton is an extreme negative candidate. Additionally, the egregious criminal manipulations are largely spewed forth from the current regime. I hold a little hope that Trump now feels loyalty to his base, and great animosity to his enemies. I see Trump now as more the zero candidate. Sadly, this is a lesser of two VERY evil choices, which is why we suggested voting for third parties (see TNN Gives Hat Tips to Jill Stein). Still, Trump has been picking up his game lately. He has actually been putting forth some spot-on policy positions:
“Withdraw the U.S. from the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
“Cancel every un-Constitutional executive action, memorandum and order issued by President Obama.”
“Cancel all federal funding of sanctuary cities.”
“Veterans will finally be taken care of properly.”
“Fully repeal ObamaCare and replace it with health savings accounts.”
“End Common Core.”
“Tax forms will be greatly simplified.”
“When they know there are consequences, our companies will stop leaving the United States.”
“A Constitutional Amendment to impose term limits on all members of Congress.”
“A hiring freeze on all federal employees.”
“A requirement that for every new federal regulation, two existing regulations must be eliminated.”
“A 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists after they leave government.”
“A lifetime ban on White House officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government.”
“A complete ban on foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections.”
I could have made this speech.